Internet approves of Congress bill barring any president from unilaterally withdrawing from NATO

The bill forbids any president from pulling the US out of NATO without the Senate's consent or an Act of Congress
PUBLISHED DEC 15, 2023
Congress has approved legislation that forbids any president from pulling the US out of NATO without the Senate's consent or an Act of Congress (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Congress has approved legislation that forbids any president from pulling the US out of NATO without the Senate's consent or an Act of Congress (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: A wave of chaos erupted online after Congress approved legislation that forbids any president from pulling the US out of NATO without the Senate's consent or an Act of Congress.

Sens Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, and Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican, teamed up to insert the clause in the $886 billion military bill that was approved by the House of Representatives on Thursday, December 14.

President Joe Biden is anticipated to sign the bill into law after the Senate approved its version on Wednesday night, according to Daily Mail.

The provision reportedly emphasizes Congress's support for the NATO alliance, which was the subject of former President Donald Trump's animosity during his time in office.

How new bill bars presidents from withdrawing from NATO?

The measure introduced by Senators Rubio and Kaine mandates that the president obtain the Senate's advice and consent prior to suspending, withdrawing, or ending American participation in NATO, a vital military alliance designed to thwart Russian aggression.

If a president attempts to leave NATO without Senate approval, or another act of Congress, the provision prohibits any funding going toward such a move.

Furthermore, this move gives the Congressional Legal Counsel permission to sue the White House. In his statement, Kaine highlighted the significance of the new bill, saying, “NATO has held strong in response to [Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s war in Ukraine and rising challenges around the world.”

He added the legislation “reaffirms US support for this crucial alliance that is foundational for our national security. It also sends a strong message to authoritarians around the world that the free world remains united.”

For his part, Rubio the bill was a vital instrument for congressional supervision. “We must ensure we are protecting our national interests and protecting the security of our democratic allies,” he said in a statement, according to the Hill.

Why did Donald Trump criticize NATO?

In August, Rolling Stone reported that Trump, the front-runner for the Republican candidacy in 2024, has kept up the rhetoric of withdrawing the United States from NATO, an idea he had considered while in office but was talked out of by top aides.

The former president previously voiced concerns about Article 5, the collective defense article that entails the United States' military involvement in the event that any NATO member state is attacked.

One former official recalled to Rolling Stone that Trump argued during an Oval Office meeting in mid-2018 that most Americans hadn't even heard of some of the smaller countries.

"In a second Trump term, we'd almost certainly withdraw from NATO," Trump's former National Security Advisor John Bolton predicted in an interview with The Hill in August.

Bolton has become a Trump critic, claiming that the president was unaware of NATO's demands for defense funding. NATO nations must allocate a minimum of two percent of their GDP to defense expenditures; but in Trump's eyes, the US is owed money, which is not the case.

“The good old USA "suckers" are paying a VAST majority of the NATO bill, & outside money, going to Ukraine. VERY UNFAIR!” Trump posted to his Truth Social network in January.

Internet reacts to the new bill

A wave of chaos erupted online after Congress approved the new legislation. “Thank god I’ve been worried about that , leaving NATO would be the biggest gift to the Kremlin,” one user praised.

“Just one little problem…..Trump won’t care abt ‘law’” a second person warned. “The child-proofing of a possible Trump 2nd term has begun!” the third user mocked.

“Now that's a 'poison pill' I can support!” the fourth user said while the fifth on wrote, “They just cut Trump off right at the knees.”

“Really big day for Western Democracy, and it’s almost gone unnoticed. Well done Congress, I’m officially impressed!” one more stated.



 



 



 



 



 

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Karoline Leavitt accused the New York Times of misrepresenting the Iran conflict, stressing that Americans need to be mindful of what they are reading
5 hours ago
John Fetterman said Donald Trump’s action made Iran getting a nuclear weapon 'virtually impossible,' making the world safer and the region more secure
5 hours ago
Trump has so far declined to publicly endorse either candidate in the tight Texas Senate race but has indicated he may soon make a decision
7 hours ago
Trump said he is undecided on the endorsement, explaining that he wants to see how Republican lawmakers handle the proposed SAVE America Act.
7 hours ago
Trump also slammed Democrats for refusing to honor the DHS funding deal that was approved and voted on in Congress
8 hours ago
John Fetterman said that Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei, son of Ali Khamenei, should also be killed, saying the world is '100%' better with his father dead
9 hours ago
Leavitt said US strikes have crippled Iran’s military capabilities, insisting the mission is meant to protect Americans and allies from future attacks
10 hours ago
President Donald Trump refused to reveal terms for ending the war but said any deal would require Iran to completely abandon its nuclear ambitions
11 hours ago
US prosecutors block former Venezuelan leader's bid to dismiss narco-t****rism case
15 hours ago
'There’s no excuse for not embracing the standing filibusters,” Anna Paulina Luna said while criticizing John Thune's approach to the SAVE Act
15 hours ago