Arizona SC’s decision to allow 98K unconfirmed citizens to vote in elections sparks debate

The court's decision followed officials' disclosure of a database error that mistakenly gave voters full ballot access for two decades
Arizona Supreme Court allowed 98,000 voters with unconfirmed citizenship status to vote in elections  (Christian Petersen/Getty Images)
Arizona Supreme Court allowed 98,000 voters with unconfirmed citizenship status to vote in elections (Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

PHEONIX, ARIZONA: The Arizona Supreme Court ruled on Friday, September 20, that around 98,000 people whose US citizenship has not been confirmed will be allowed to vote in the upcoming state and local elections, per Fox News.

The court's decision came after officials disclosed a "database error" that erroneously classified the voters as having access to the full ballot for the past two decades.

Arizona Supreme Court allows 98K unconfirmed citizens to vote in election

The Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, and Stephen Richer, the Republican Maricopa County recorder, disagreed on the voters' status. Richer asked the high court to weigh in, adding that Fontes ignored state law by advising county officials to allow affected voters to cast full ballots.

Meanwhile, Fontes argued that denying voters who believed they met the voting requirements access to the full ballot would raise concerns regarding equal protection and due process.

Voters wait to cast their ballots at Burton Barr Central Library on November 3, 2020 in Phoenix, Arizona. After a record-breaking early voting turnout, Americans head to the polls on the last day to cast their vote for incumbent U.S. President Donald Trump or Democratic nominee Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election. (Photo by Courtney Pedroza/Getty Images)
Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said that not allowing the voters who believed they had voting requirements access to the full ballot would lead to equal protection and due process concerns (Courtney Pedroza/Getty Images)

Notably, the high court sided with Fontes, stating that county officials do not have the authority to alter the voters' statuses, as these individuals registered long ago and affirmed their citizenship under penalty of law.

The justices noted that the voters were not responsible for the "database error" and highlighted the limited time remaining before the November 5 general election.

Chief Justice Ann Scott Timmer stated in the ruling, "We are unwilling on these facts to disenfranchise voters en masse from participating in state contests."

Arizona's unique voting law

Arizona is unique among states as it requires voters to prove their citizenship in order to participate in local and state elections. Voters can verify their citizenship by providing a driver's license or tribal ID number, or by submitting a copy of a birth certificate, passport, or naturalization documents, per the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

The state accepts driver's licenses issued after October 1996 as valid proof of citizenship. However, a system coding error mistakenly designated nearly 98,000 voters who obtained licenses before 1996—about 2.5% of all registered voters—as eligible for full ballots, according to state officials.



 

Notably, the error between the state's voter registration database and the Motor Vehicle Division would not have affected the presidential race.

However, the number of votes could sway outcomes in competitive state Legislature races, where Republicans hold a narrow majority in both chambers.

Internet divided as Arizona SC allows 98K unconfirmed citizens to vote in election

People online were divided, with mixed reactions, after the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that nearly 98,000 individuals whose US citizenship has not been confirmed will be permitted to vote in the upcoming state and local elections.

Some online comments read, "Seems like it would be more appropriate to error on the side of caution and rule they can’t vote until they prove who they are. After all, our country needs honesty and not fraudulent voting," and "I’d say it’s unbelievable but that term went out the window years ago. Surely this can be appealed to SCOTUS for immediate review and ruling. How can non-citizens be allowed to vote?"

Voters wait to cast their ballots on November 08, 2022 in Tucson, Arizona. After months of candidates campaigning, Americans are voting in the midterm elections to decide close races across the nation. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
People shared mixed reactions as the Arizona Supreme Court allowed 98,000 unconfirmed citizens to vote in elections (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

A person also stated, "State and local elections - because they live in those areas and have a right to vote. It's not rocket science," whereas one mentioned, "American citizens lose again. it’s sad that the next president could be elected because of the vote of illegal immigrants."

A user also wrote, "I don't understand what is so hard about this. When you get your valid ID or drivers license, you register to vote," while one commented, "It’s for state election not federal." [sic]

A person also mentioned, "Here we go again, why wouldn’t anybody NOT want a fair election. Win or lose should be fair." [sic]

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

The US-brokered accords, signed by several Muslim-majority nations during President Trump's first term, aimed to normalize ties with Israel
5 hours ago
'I've said before, you got to get to 50, and I can't count to 50 right now on a budget resolution', John Thune said
6 hours ago
The complaint alleged DHS and FEMA tied new conditions to over $740 million in grants, calling it a 'campaign of coercion'
6 hours ago
Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros Discovery will delay closing until at least June as a California court reviews the merger
7 hours ago
The proposed calendar would elevate South Carolina, giving a handful of early-voting states greater influence over the Democratic nomination
7 hours ago
Former Sen Joe Manchin criticized the Democrats' leftward shift, citing primary wins by candidates backed by Zohran Mamdani
8 hours ago
A senior White House official said President Trump would briefly address the April violence and deliver jokes from the original dinner
8 hours ago
Two advisers urged Zohran Mamdani's campaign to drop the Netanyahu issue, citing legal barriers and concerns it would distract from city matters
8 hours ago
The rare gathering comes as Washington weighs key decisions on Iran, Gaza and Ukraine, creating an unexpected diplomatic opening
10 hours ago
Rep Carlos Gimenez said most House Republicans were team players frustrated by a small minority that repeatedly blocked legislation
10 hours ago