'Dangerous precedent': Jim Jordan urges Congress to 'defund lawfare activities' of Trump prosecutors, sparks debate online

The proposal includes plans to defund investigations by Jack Smith, District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis
PUBLISHED JUN 4, 2024
House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan recommended that Congress defund the 'lawfare activities of state and federal prosecutors who are targeting former President Donald Trump (Getty Images)
House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan recommended that Congress defund the 'lawfare activities of state and federal prosecutors who are targeting former President Donald Trump (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Jim Jordan, told Fox News Digital that he is putting forth an appropriations package that would 'defund the lawfare activities' of federal and state prosecutors conducting 'politically sensitive investigations', citing Special Counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in particular. 

Notably, the proposition was made in the days following the conviction of former President Donald Trump on all 34 counts of falsifying business records, which were the result of Bragg's claims against him.

Jim Jordan urges Congress to 'defund lawfare activities' of Trump prosecutors

In addition, Trump is awaiting a decision from the Supreme Court about his immunity from charges made by Smith during his inquiry on January 6, as well as a trial date for charges related to Smith's case involving classified documents and a trial date for charges brought by Willis in Georgia.

Tom Cole, the Republican chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, received Jordan's proposal on Monday, June 3. The letter and his suggestion were obtained by Fox News Digital.

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) questions top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine William
Jim Jordan assisted in 2023 in putting reforms into place via the appropriations process (Getty Images)

Jordan wrote, "The Committee on the Judiciary and its Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government continue to conduct vigorous oversight over the Biden Administration to protect Americans’ fundamental freedoms."

Jordan assisted in 2023 in putting reforms into place via the appropriations process, such as 'proposals to prohibit the funding of politically sensitive investigations, protect whistleblowers against retaliation, prevent taxpayer funds from being used to implement radical regulations, prohibit the funding of disastrous Biden immigration policies, and stop the funding of government censorship – among other proposals – which were included in Subcommittee or Full Committee-passed bills.'

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 23:  U.S. House Oversight and Reform Committee ranking member Rep. Jim Jord
Jim Jordan stated that he has spent the year conducting oversight of 'rise in politicized prosecutions'  (Getty Images)

Jordan stated that during the 2025 fiscal year, he intends to expand on that effort. According to Jordan, he has been supervising 'the concerning increase in politically motivated prosecutions and the use of abusive 'lawfare' tactics to target political opponents' throughout the whole year. 

He said, "We have seen rogue prosecutors abuse the rules of professional conduct and their duty to do justice in service of politicized ends."

Moreover, Jordan suggested that language "to eliminate federal funding for state prosecutors or state attorneys general involved in lawfare and to zero out federal funding for federal prosecutors engaged in such abuse" be included in the fiscal year 2025 budget bill.

Internet divided as Jim Jordan urges Congress to 'defund lawfare activities' of Trump prosecutors

People on the internet stayed divided and had mixed reactions as Jim Jordan said that he is putting forth an appropriations package that would 'defund the lawfare activities' of federal and state prosecutors conducting 'politically sensitive investigations'.

A user posted on X, "Honestly, this feels like a dangerous precedent. Defunding prosecutors because they're investigating someone? That's not how the justice system is supposed to work. If there's evidence of wrongdoing, it should be investigated, regardless of who it is," while one added, "Any prosecutor, judge, or jury that engages in lawfare should get mandatory life imprisonment."



 



 

A person also wrote, "'Lawfare' is just a fancy word for 'politics by other means'. Defunding it won't make the problems go away, just shift the burden elsewhere," whereas one mentioned, "So Rep Jordan urges Congress to obstruct prosecutors from doing their job only when Trump is involved." 



 



 

 A user also added, "Democrats bark “no one is above the law” but when they have to face it they lie and pay crooked people over seeing courts millions."



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Donald Trump reacted angrily after the Justice Department disclosed a massive new batch of Epstein-related records uncovered in New York
12 hours ago
DOJ memo restored full exclusion on abortion and counseling, even removing them from VA benefits, with only life‑saving exceptions remaining
18 hours ago
The American Academy of Pediatrics sued HHS over $12 million grant cuts, saying they threatened infant safety and rural child health programs
22 hours ago
Tina Peters' attorneys argued that Trump's December pardon voided state convictions, but Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser rejected the claim
1 day ago
Marina Lacerda urged Andrew Mountbatten‑Windsor to face US questioning, insisting that he should 'come to America,' though she doubted it would happen
1 day ago
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer slammed DOJ delays in releasing Epstein files, demanding answers on Trump’s potential involvement
2 days ago
19 Democratic-led states argued that the HHS policy on transgender care undermined medical authority and threatened nationwide access
2 days ago
12 bipartisan senators urged an independent review of the DOJ’s handling of Epstein files, citing missed deadlines and excessive redactions
2 days ago
Judge Amir Ali said that officials canceled Mark Zaid’s security clearance without due process and failed to conduct a proper national security review
2 days ago
'Because the law requires us to release all documents related to Jeffrey Epstein in our possession so that’s what we are doing, you dope,' DOJ said
2 days ago