Gavin Newsom questions missing Epstein files from DOJ site, asks what Trump allies are hiding

The DOJ said document releases could change due to technical errors, legal reviews, or added redactions to protect privacy and follow court orders
PUBLISHED 1 HOUR AGO
California Governor Gavin Newsom raised concerns about missing documents from the Department of Justice’s recent release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files (Getty Images)
California Governor Gavin Newsom raised concerns about missing documents from the Department of Justice’s recent release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: California Gov Gavin Newsom on Saturday, Dec 20, raised concerns about missing documents from the Department of Justice’s recently released batch of Jeffrey Epstein-related files.

He suggested that the absence of some materials raises questions about transparency and adherence to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Newsom’s comments came after reports that several files, including one with a photograph of President Donald Trump, were briefly posted on the DOJ website before being taken down.

Gavin Newsom hints on Trump ‘hiding’ something

The Epstein Files Transparency Act mandates the gradual public disclosure of records related to Epstein’s prosecution and contacts.

Republicans and Democrats on the Federal Law Enforcement Subcommittee approved by voice vote a motion to issue subpoenas to ten individuals, including former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (House Committee on Oversight)
Republicans and Democrats on the Federal Law Enforcement Subcommittee approved by voice vote a motion to issue subpoenas to ten individuals, including former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (House Committee on Oversight)

Newsom suggested the removals could point to deliberate withholding of information and directly accused allies of President Donald Trump of hiding material from public view.

In a post on X, Newsom’s Press Office wrote, “WHAT ARE TRUMP, BONDI, AND KASH HIDING? IS THIS WHY BONGINO QUIT THE DAY BEFORE THEY IGNORED THE LAW AND RELEASED ONLY A FEW FILES?”



Files briefly posted, then removed

According to reports, at least 16 files related to Epstein were posted on the DOJ’s website before being removed. 

The deleted materials reportedly included a document with a photograph of Donald Trump. 

Observers watching the DOJ site noticed the files were gone, leading to online speculation about whether the removal was intentional or due to administrative or legal problems.



The Epstein Files Transparency Act requires the DOJ to release documents in phases. This approach balances public disclosure with privacy protections and legal limits. 

However, the temporary availability of certain files, along with their sudden removal, has led to claims that the process is inconsistent and unclear.

Portrait of American financier Jeffrey Epstein (left) and real estate developer Donald Trump as they pose together at the Mar-a-Lago estate, Palm Beach, Florida, 1997. (Photo by Davidoff Studios/Getty Images)
Portrait of American financier Jeffrey Epstein (left) and Donald Trump as they pose together at the Mar-a-Lago estate, Palm Beach, Florida, 1997 (Davidoff Studios/Getty Images)

Newsom’s comments presented the issue as a political cover-up. He connected the missing files to key Trump supporters and to conservative media personality Dan Bongino. 

Bongino recently left his position as a deputy director at the FBI. While Newsom suggested a link between Bongino’s exit and the file release, no public evidence has confirmed any relationship.

LOS ANGELES, CA - OCTOBER 21:  Dan Bongino speaks onstage during Politicon 2018 at Los Angeles Conve
 Dan Bongino speaks onstage during Politicon 2018 at Los Angeles Convention Center on October 21, 2018 in Los Angeles, California (Getty Images)

In previous statements addressing similar criticism, DOJ officials said that document releases might change because of technical errors, legal reviews, or the need to add more redactions to meet privacy laws and court orders.



The DOJ has also mentioned that references to politically exposed persons are not being redacted selectively. Additional Epstein-related materials will continue to be released as required by law.

It remains unclear whether the removed documents will be reposted or formally explained by the DOJ.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Marina Lacerda said the DOJ released only partial, heavily redacted Jeffrey Epstein files, calling it a cover-up involving Donald Trump’s network
47 minutes ago
Donald Trump endorsed Bruce Blakeman on Truth Social, praising him as MAGA and predicting a November win over Kathy Hochul
4 hours ago
The Justice Department faced fresh scrutiny after Epstein records, including images of Donald Trump, were removed without explanation from its website
5 hours ago
Thomas Massie criticized the Donald Trump admin, saying the DOJ violated transparency law by releasing Jeffrey Epstein files late on December 20
5 hours ago
Kayleigh McEnany said that a competitive primary would strengthen the nominee as Republicans considered succession plans following Trump’s second term
9 hours ago
Dick Durbin claimed that the DOJ prioritized protecting Donald Trump and other elites instead of delivering justice to the Epstein survivors
9 hours ago
Rudy Giuliani argued that ending homeless camp clearances could undo decades of progress and expose the city to rising crime risks
9 hours ago
Over 60,000 Jeffrey Epstein-linked pages were made public in 2025, but only a fraction contained new information beyond prior disclosures
11 hours ago
DOJ added court filings that detailed past Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases but noted that sensitive details like phone logs were obscured
11 hours ago
Ro Khanna accused the DOJ of failing victims through partial disclosures and shielding powerful men who blocked law enforcement from acting
12 hours ago