Legal experts claim Trump could face harsh ruling for defying Judge Merchan's gag order, Internet says 'lock him up'

Donald Trump's persistent disregard for the judge's gag order may have negative consequences for him if the Manhattan jury delivers a guilty verdict
UPDATED MAY 26, 2024
Legal professionals suggest that Donald Trump could potentially receive a more severe sentence for defying Judge Juan Merchan's gag order in the ongoing hush money criminal trial (Getty Images, Juan Merchan/LinkedIn)
Legal professionals suggest that Donald Trump could potentially receive a more severe sentence for defying Judge Juan Merchan's gag order in the ongoing hush money criminal trial (Getty Images, Juan Merchan/LinkedIn)

MANHATTAN, NEW YORK: Several legal experts believe that if former President Donald Trump is found guilty of any of the 34 felony charges in his ongoing hush money criminal trial, his sentence could be more severe than usual due to his continued defiance of Judge Juan Merchan’s orders.

Specifically, the 77-year-old's persistent disregard for the judge's gag order may have negative consequences for him if the Manhattan jury delivers a guilty verdict, according to RawStory.

What did legal experts say regarding Trump’s chances of conviction in the hush money case?

Former prosecutors, speaking to Politico's Ben Feuerherd in interviews, have conjectured that the behavior of the ex-president during the hush money trial might have rendered him more susceptible to stricter treatment by the judge.

According to Politico, "If he’s convicted, Trump’s defiance of the judge’s order, including two recent comments posing a new test of its boundaries — could make things worse for the former president at sentencing.”


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Team Trump (@teamtrump)


 

Former Manhattan prosecutor Mark Bederow claimed, "Those are obviously aggravating factors, generically speaking, for someone to get a stiffer sentence."

The New York Law School's Anna Cominsky asserts that while "having to deal with the gag order is a huge distraction for both sides," this does not mean that prosecutors will overlook mentioning the violations during the actual sentencing process.

Former US Attorney Barbara McQuade said that Trump's breach of the gag order may be a wild card when it comes to the terms of his punishment.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by President Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump)


 

“Trump’s contempt for the judge’s gag order is so unprecedented that it’s very difficult to say how a judge would usually handle such a situation,” McQuade remarked.

She went on to say, "Remorse and the need to promote respect for the law are typically factors that a judge takes into consideration when imposing sentences. Trump’s repeated violations of the gag order certainly demonstrate the lack of remorse and respect for the law.”

Internet reacts to legal experts' concerns over Trump's gag order defiance

One X user claimed, "The big problem is he keeps thinking campaigning or being ex-president gives him some sort of special legal status. It does not."



 

Another user said, "About time… but hope diminish with time. Any one else would be in dire straits w similar behavior." [sic]



 

Another user wrote, "Let’s hope the sentence is stiff enough to make a difference!"



 

One user remarked, "Gag him for ever." [sic]



 

Another X user quipped, "My neighbor once went to the states & at the border gave the border patrol some mouth. Well that didn’t go well, he missed his event . Lesson learned? THINK before you go mouth off." [sic]



 

Finally, this user tweeted, "F**ing lock him up !"



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Beatty alleged that she was 'muted on the call and not allowed to speak or voice' her opposition to the board vote, and likened it to 'censorship'
25 minutes ago
Although the letter did not name Donald Trump, it said 'our president' shared Jeffrey Epstein and Larry Nassar's alleged love for 'young' girls
1 hour ago
DOJ stated that certain Epstein files held 'sensational' but 'false' allegations against Trump, but they still released them to comply with the law
3 hours ago
'If they wanted to put 1,000 lawyers on this to review the documents and get them ready for the production, they could have,' Sarah Krissoff claimed
4 hours ago
A Democratic strategist said that the images do suggest a 'certain acceptance' of the environment that allowed for someone like Epstein to exist
10 hours ago
After the Epstein files release, Hillary Clinton stayed detached, chose not to defend Bill Clinton, and left him to face the fallout alone
11 hours ago
Mark Epstein claimed that the Department of Justice is 'sanitizing' Epstein files to remove Republican names but offered no evidence to support it
15 hours ago
Trump criticized media outlets for focusing on Epstein rather than economic, defense, and healthcare achievements
15 hours ago
Ro Khanna said that every time the government withholds documents, it only fuels suspicion
16 hours ago
Trump also said 'Look, I don’t like the—I like Bill Clinton. I’ve always gotten along with Bill Clinton' as he commented on the pictures of the former pres being prominently featured in the documents
17 hours ago