John Roberts refuses to meet Dems pushing for Samuel Alito's recusal from Jan 6 case over flag controversy

WASHINGTON, DC: On Thursday, May 30, Chief Justice John Roberts refused a meeting request from Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse.

They sought to discuss their advocacy for Justice Samuel Alito's recusal from forthcoming Supreme Court cases related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attacks and attempts to reverse the 2020 election outcome, also involving Donald Trump.

Chief Justice John Roberts' reasons for declining Democratic senators' meeting request

The two Democratic senators requested a meeting with the chief justice last week after reports surfaced that upside-down flags were flown on Alito's residence in 2021, indicating his support of 'Stop the Seal' protests, which he has since declined. 

Durbin and Whitehouse advocate for new ethics legislation directed at Supreme Court judges.

Chief Justice Roberts refused the meeting, citing the absence of precedence for such a meeting with legislators from one party.

"I must respectfully decline your request for a meeting,” he wrote in a letter, according to The Hill.

“As noted in my letter to Chairman Durbin last April, apart from ceremonial events, only on rare occasions in our Nation’s history has a sitting Chief Justice met with legislators, even in a public setting (such as a Committee hearing) with members of both major political parties present," he wrote further.

Chief Justice John Roberts says he can't sit with a single party 

Further stressing about "separation of powers concerns," Chief Justice Roberts explained why he couldn't have a meeting with the Democrat senators. He said his action was aimed at "preserving judicial independence."

"Moreover, the format proposed — a meeting with leaders of only one party who have expressed an interest in matters currently pending before the Court — simply underscores that participating in such a meeting would be inadvisable," he wrote further. 

The letter to Roberts by Durbin and Whitehouse sought a meeting to discuss Alito's recusal from the January 6 Capitol riots cases and one which would decide whether former President Trump has immunity from prosecution.

It also draws attention toward Alito's association with the protests following the flags controversy and raises doubts about his "impartiality" in certain proceedings that required his "disqualification." 

The denial comes one day after Alito refused to rescue himself from cases citing he had "nothing whatsoever to do with the flying of that flag."

Internet divided as Chief Justice John Roberts refuses Democrat senators' meet

Internet sided with Chief Justice Roberts for his refusal and suggested that the judiciary does not side with direct intervention. Some, however, mocked senators and the Chief Justice too.

"He has to be one of the weakest Chief Justices in history, he’s lost the reputation and integrity of the Court," wrote one on X.

One more wrote, "As he should. The judiciary is not subject to direct intervention any more than Congress would be or the White House would be."

Another netizen slammed the senators writing, "Two of the worst senators, of course."

"It’s hard to disagree. It’s not like Roberts can do anything about it," wrote one in support. Another user wrote, "He's right though. There is a reason for separation of powers in our govt."

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.