'Democracy is in danger': Internet slams Kristen Welker over remark on Donald Trump's presidential immunity and 2020 election conduct

Kristen Welker's use of 'allegedly' drew criticism, with detractors arguing it's indisputable Trump sought to overturn the elections
PUBLISHED MAR 4, 2024
Kristen Welker sparked controversy with remarks on Donald Trump's 2020 election conduct, focusing on his claims of immunity (NBC/Getty)
Kristen Welker sparked controversy with remarks on Donald Trump's 2020 election conduct, focusing on his claims of immunity (NBC/Getty)

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: NBC News' 'Meet the Press' anchor Kristen Welker found herself at the center of controversy on Sunday after making comments about former President Donald Trump's conduct during the 2020 presidential election. The remarks made by Welker ignited a storm of criticism on social media.

During the program, Welker delved into Trump's assertions that his presidential immunity should shield him from facing legal consequences in the Department of Justice's investigation into his actions surrounding the 2020 election.

She highlighted Trump's argument that he is "immune from criminal prosecution for allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 election."

Kristen Welker's Use of 'allegedly' ignites controversy

However, Welker's choice of the term 'allegedly' became a focal point of contention. Critics argued that it is not a matter of dispute whether Trump attempted to overturn the election results; rather, the controversy lies in whether he violated the law in the process.

Trump, without substantial evidence, had consistently claimed that the election was stolen from him through widespread voter fraud.

Backlash over downplaying

The use of the term 'allegedly' in reference to Trump's actions drew swift backlash, with many expressing frustration that it seemed to downplay or question the widely acknowledged fact that Trump sought to challenge the election outcome.

Critics argued that the emphasis should be on whether his actions constituted a breach of the law, rather than casting doubt on the nature of his attempts to overturn the election.

The debate on social media reflects the deep divisions and polarized opinions surrounding Trump's presidency and the events that unfolded after the 2020 election.

Welker's remarks on Meet the Press have further fueled the ongoing discussions about accountability, presidential immunity, and the boundaries of legal scrutiny for a former commander-in-chief.



 

Kristen Welker's remarks on Trump's election actions draw criticism

Social media erupts as NBC News' Kristen Welker faces backlash for her choice of words during a discussion on former President Donald Trump's behavior surrounding the 2020 election

One user wrote, "Hakeem Jeffries makes it clear to Kristen Welker that it is not the job of Democrats to fix GOP speaker mess, "That is on my house Republican colleagues. We have made clear publicly and privately that we are ready, willing and able to enter into a bipartisan governing coalition."



 

Another added, "I know right? What is the protocol here? "Become anchor, lose integrity" ?"



 

One commented, "What’s gotten into Kristen, and the other journalists at CNN, ect? Scary stuff that they seem to actually be in support of him these days."



 

Another replied, "Guaranteed that there is a lawyer behind this word. Until he is convicted, they’ll continue to use the word “alleged.” I worked in radio for 15 years and even the Manson family was called “accused” or “alleged.” In this case, Welker is conforming to standards of the company."



 

"Democracy is in danger...," wrote one.



 

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

DHS Sec Noem says threats monitored nationwide as Secret Service, FBI, police boost security
50 minutes ago
Governors and national figures condemned the joint US-Israeli action as unauthorized, arguing Congress was sidelined and troops were put at risk
1 hour ago
Senior Democrats urged Congress to assert constitutional authority after Donald Trump authorized military action without prior approval from lawmakers
2 hours ago
Omar and Tlaib call for renewed diplomacy, asserting that war powers rest with Congress
2 hours ago
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president remained in close contact with advisers while military action targeted Iranian assets
2 hours ago
The president acknowledged possible US casualties and stated military action targeted Iran's missile and naval capabilities after failed diplomacy
3 hours ago
John Thune cited Iran's nuclear ambitions, missile programs, and regional influence as creating unacceptable risks for personnel and partner nations
4 hours ago
Speaker Mike Johnson said that the 'Gang of Eight' had been warned days earlier that force was needed to protect Americans after diplomacy failed
4 hours ago
Democrat Mark Warner raises 'serious legal and constitutional concerns' over the operation
4 hours ago
Senior GOP lawmakers framed the joint operation as necessary to curb Iran's military capacity and protect long-term American security interests
4 hours ago