DOJ Epstein files redactions accidentally exposed through simple copy and paste
WASHINGTON, DC: Information released by the Department of Justice in newly published files tied to Jeffrey Epstein was reportedly not properly redacted, allowing blacked-out text to become visible through a basic copy-and-paste function.
The documents were posted beginning Friday, December 19, under the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act', in line with a midnight deadline.
While the scale of redactions immediately sparked criticism, further examination of the nearly 30,000 newly released pages revealed that many blackout markings could be bypassed with minimal effort.
Civil suit in Epstein files reveals sensitive allegations
In one file about a civil lawsuit against the executors of Epstein’s estate, copying the redacted text exposed allegations involving financial transactions linked to Epstein’s foundation.
The unmasked text showed the estate executor's name and that he had signed a check from Epstein’s foundation to an immigration lawyer described in the document as being “involved in one or more forced marriages arranged among Epstein’s victims.”
Another redacted passage in the same lawsuit detailed payments totaling more than $400,000 that were allegedly authorized between September 2015 and June 2019.
The payments were reportedly made to young female models and actresses, including a former Russian model who allegedly received more than $380,000 through monthly installments of $8,333 over a period exceeding three and a half years.
Claims of intimidation and evidence destruction
Additional portions of the lawsuit, initially obscured but later revealed through the flawed redaction process, alleged that Epstein had threatened people who attempted to go public and also assisted in spreading damaging stories about them.
The filing further claimed that Epstein had instructed participants within his enterprise to destroy evidence relevant to ongoing court proceedings.
DOJ defends redaction standards in Epstein files
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the Justice Department’s approach, stating that “the only redactions being applied to the documents are those required by law.” Blanche also stated that the department acted to ensure it was “protecting every single victim.”
However, a report by Fox News Digital suggested that the redactions extended beyond victim protection. According to the outlet, the DOJ also allegedly applied the same redaction standards to politically exposed individuals and government officials.
The 'Epstein Files Transparency Act' explicitly prohibits redactions based on “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity,” allowing only limited exceptions to protect the identities of survivors.
