Donald Trump dubbed 'economically illiterate' by experts over flawed claims about tariffs

At his Wilkes-Barre rally, Donald Trump pledged to impose new tariffs on foreign-made goods, describing it as a tax that doesn't affect Americans
Donald Trump remarks on tariffs and their impact on Americans have been challenged by economic experts (Getty Images)
Donald Trump remarks on tariffs and their impact on Americans have been challenged by economic experts (Getty Images)

WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA: Former President Donald Trump faced considerable backlash after making a controversial statement about tariffs during a campaign rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania on Saturday, August 17. 

The GOP presidential nominee claimed that imposing tariffs on foreign-made products, particularly from countries like China, does not impact the nation negatively, leading critics to label his economic understanding as flawed.

MONTOURSVILLE, PA - OCTOBER 31: U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to speak to supporters during a
Donald Trump once again floated his idea of increasing tariffs on foreign-made goods during his Wilkes-Barre rally (Getty Images)

Donald Trump’s tariff proposal and subsequent backlash

In his speech, Donald Trump pledged to impose tariffs on foreign-made goods to bring jobs back to the US and generate "billions and billions of dollars" for the economy. He insisted that tariffs are a tax on foreign countries rather than on American consumers, directly contradicting the widely accepted economic understanding of tariffs.

"A tariff is a tax on a foreign country, that’s the way it is whether you like it or not. A lot of people like to say, 'Oh, it’s a tax on us.' No, no, no," told Trump to the rally crowd, adding, "It’s a tax on a country that’s ripping us off and stealing our jobs. And it’s a tax that doesn’t affect our country."



 

Many critics took to social media to challenge the MAGA strongman's understanding of tariffs.

Mark Cuban, a billionaire entrepreneur and frequent Trump critic, responded by questioning the practicality of Trump's claim, particularly for importers of essential goods like food and agricultural products.

Taking to X (formerly Twitter), he wrote, "Any importers want to explain how they deal with tariffs on say food or agricultural products?" highlighting the direct impact tariffs have on American businesses and consumers.



 

Robert Shrum, director of the University of Southern California's Center for the Political Future and a former speechwriter for the late Sen Ted Kennedy, did not mince words in his critique, describing Trump's remarks as

"simply economically illiterate."

He added, "No wonder he apparently had a mediocre record at Wharton." 



 

Several others piled on to the criticism on X. 

One wrote, "I'm sure the farmers who he had to bail out because of the tariffs he implemented would like a word," and another said, "I believe a person running for president ought to understand tariffs. I also believe they shouldn't have criminal convictions but what do I know?"

"I guess Trump must have paid someone else to attend Econ 101 at Wharton because this is really basic stuff and he's dead wrong," joked a person, with an individual quipping, "Felon Trump still doesn’t know how things work. And he never will." 

"He is so dumb. It’s so disheartening seeing how many Americans support this type of person," expressed another person. 



 



 



 



 



 

Experts weigh in on how Donald Trump's tariffs plan might affect Americans

Donald Trump's proposal about tariffs has also been scrutinized by economists who argue that such policies would likely result in higher costs for American consumers and harm businesses.

Barbara Spencer, a former professor of strategy and business at the University of British Columbia, criticized his plan of implementing 10 to 20 percent tariffs on certain countries.

"Even if this tariff policy will be applied only to countries that Trump views as political foes, it is remarkable that a person as educated as Trump would see all imports from those countries as ripping off the US," told Spencer to Newsweek.

She went on, "A significant proportion of imports into the US are intermediate goods that reduce the costs of US firms allowing them to make profits in competition with foreign rivals both at home and abroad." 

"A tariff would raise the costs and prices of these firms, hurting both the firms and US consumers. Firms in the US that compete directly with imports can enjoy increased profits from an import tariff, but this would typically involve the firm raising its prices at the expense of US consumers," noted the Spencer. 

Matilde Bombardini, an associate professor of business and public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, also warned that Trump’s proposed tariffs would likely lead to increased prices for US consumers and companies.

She mentioned, "What we have seen is that tariffs on China have led to several producers relocating to Vietnam and Thailand. So, we can expect that further tariffs would impact prices paid by consumers and firms, with unclear benefits for US workers." 



 

Abigail Cooke, a trade policy expert at the University at Buffalo, echoed these concerns, noting that tariffs not only raise prices for American consumers but also hurt American producers who rely on imported inputs.

She began, "There are two things missing from the overly simplified idea that placing tariffs on other countries' products hurts those foreign producers and helps American producers."

"First, it raises prices for American consumers. We've just gone through a period of relatively elevated inflation rates that have made American consumers really upset. Tariffs contribute to higher prices," explained Cooke. 

She added, "Second, American producers rely heavily on imported inputs. There are virtually no American-only-made supply chains. So tariffs also hurt many American producers. Tariffs, especially for a relatively wealthy country like the US, are a blunt economic tool with many of the costs also borne at home in the US." 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Trump’s lawyers called the subpoenas an abuse, alleging that they were intended to harass his family and distract from the BBC’s liability
6 hours ago
Marjorie Taylor Greene insisted that she had remained committed to the conservative and 'America First' principles she once shared with Donald Trump
7 hours ago
The remarks, reported from a recording shared with The Canadian Press, came as the countries were engaged in last-minute talks over threatened tariffs
7 hours ago
Nancy Mace questioned Darline Graham’s readiness for the Senate after her remarks on Taiwan, the South China Sea and relying on Trump on Iran
7 hours ago
Lisa Demuth says there’s a real disconnect between what Amy Klobuchar is saying now and how she stayed quiet when the 'Feeding Our Future' fraud broke
8 hours ago
Critics have condemned the measure, arguing that it could intimidate people 'trying to shine light on bad behavior'
9 hours ago
Hunter Biden conceded that Benjamin Netanyahu had sought Jared Kushner's involvement as Maher challenged his criticism of Trump's Middle East envoy
9 hours ago
Tom Homan cited deportations to 180 countries while responding to Florida Senate candidate Angie Nixon’s concerns over ICE enforcement
10 hours ago
Hunter Biden's comments come after his mother, Jill Biden, said that the family would support him if he ever decided to run for president
10 hours ago
Donald Trump made the claim while campaigning for Darline Graham in South Carolina, offering no details about hospitals allegedly carrying out the procedures
12 hours ago