'Drill baby drill': Senate Democrats' plan to probe Trump's solicitation of campaign funds from oil industry draws Internet's attention

A report revealed that Donald Trump pitched tax cuts and deregulation to oil companies as a favorable 'deal' for their executives
UPDATED MAY 25, 2024
Sheldon Whitehouse and Ron Wyden, chairs of the Senate Budget and Finance committees, have announced their decision to initiate an inquiry into Donald Trump soliciting campaign contributions from oil company executives (@senwhitehouse, @ronwyden/IG, Getty
Sheldon Whitehouse and Ron Wyden, chairs of the Senate Budget and Finance committees, have announced their decision to initiate an inquiry into Donald Trump soliciting campaign contributions from oil company executives (@senwhitehouse, @ronwyden/IG, Getty

WASHINGTON, DC: Senate Democrats have announced their intention to conduct an investigation into former President Donald Trump’s solicitation of $1 billion in campaign contributions from the oil industry, per The Hill.

On Thursday, May 23, Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), chairs of the Finance and Budget committees, respectively, disclosed their plans to scrutinize the request made by the 2024 presumptive Republican nominee at a campaign event held in Mar-a-Lago last month.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by President Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump)


 

The two Democrat Senators have formally reached out to eight energy companies and an industry lobbying group, requesting any materials distributed to event attendees, details of policy proposals deliberated upon during the event, and information regarding donations made by the companies or their political action committees (PACs).

What prompted this probe into Donald Trump by Senate Democrats?

A Washington Post report unveiled that former President Trump suggested to oil companies that his administration's proposed tax cuts and relaxed regulations would benefit oil executives, framing it as a "deal."

A source informed the aforementioned outlet that this statement was not framed as a quid pro quo.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by President Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump)


 

Nevertheless, Senators Whitehouse and Wyden accused the oil industry in their letter of “conferring on how to trade campaign cash for policy changes.”

While a House Democrat recently announced a similar investigation, the power dynamics within the Senate and House afford Senators Wyden and Whitehouse greater authority to carry out the inquiry.

The American Petroleum Institute (API), the oil and gas lobbying group addressed in the Senate Democrats' letter, dismissed their efforts as an "election-year stunt to distract from America’s need for more energy.”


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by President Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump)


 

API spokesperson Andrea Woods said in a written statement, “API meets with candidates and policymakers to discuss the need for sound energy policies, and this meeting was no different.”

“Our policy priorities are clear – on our website; in speeches, statements and public events; in regulatory filings and court dockets – and we will continue to advocate for policies that strengthen America’s energy advantage,” she added.

Internet reacts as Senate Democrats probe Trump's solicitation of campaign funds from oil industry

One X user remarked, "Drill baby drill."



 

Another user said, "Of course they are! They can’t stop him any other way so now they are going to go after him for something else! The more they go after him, the more we are determined to vote for him."



 

Another user wrote, "He's trying to sell the presidency. However, he'll never make it to the #WhiteHouse again. The #OilCompanies will be #SOL."



 

One user claimed, "So Obama, Clinton, and Biden can go around get massive donations from all the tech billionaires but Trump cannot do the same from oil billionaires? Good to know. Nice to see a level playing field and lack of election interference."



 

Another X user argued, "More scrutiny on Trump's financial dealings. Transparency is key, especially with potential conflicts of interest."



 

Finally, this user tweeted, "Desperate Democrats try to manufacture another false narrative."



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Lawmaker says uncertainty over expiring subsidies and potential government shutdown are fueling anxiety among constituents nationwide
21 minutes ago
The biotech entrepreneur is pivoting to a 'conservative without being combative' message as he faces racist attacks from the far right
40 minutes ago
Donald Trump reacted angrily after the Justice Department disclosed a massive new batch of Epstein-related records uncovered in New York
1 day ago
DOJ memo restored full exclusion on abortion and counseling, even removing them from VA benefits, with only life‑saving exceptions remaining
1 day ago
The American Academy of Pediatrics sued HHS over $12 million grant cuts, saying they threatened infant safety and rural child health programs
1 day ago
Tina Peters' attorneys argued that Trump's December pardon voided state convictions, but Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser rejected the claim
2 days ago
Marina Lacerda urged Andrew Mountbatten‑Windsor to face US questioning, insisting that he should 'come to America,' though she doubted it would happen
2 days ago
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer slammed DOJ delays in releasing Epstein files, demanding answers on Trump’s potential involvement
3 days ago
19 Democratic-led states argued that the HHS policy on transgender care undermined medical authority and threatened nationwide access
3 days ago
12 bipartisan senators urged an independent review of the DOJ’s handling of Epstein files, citing missed deadlines and excessive redactions
3 days ago