Elon Musk vows aid to Epstein victims who out culprits after Matt Walsh slams their Super Bowl ad

Elon Musk responded to Matt Walsh saying that Epstein survivors 'embarked on a months-long publicity campaign' instead of naming their abusers
PUBLISHED FEB 9, 2026
Billionaire Elon Musk offered to bankroll the legal defense of any Jeffrey Epstein victim who outs their alleged abusers after conservative pundit Matt Walsh slammed a Super Bowl ad featuring survivors (Getty Images, Gage Skidmore/Creative Commons)
Billionaire Elon Musk offered to bankroll the legal defense of any Jeffrey Epstein victim who outs their alleged abusers after conservative pundit Matt Walsh slammed a Super Bowl ad featuring survivors (Getty Images, Gage Skidmore/Creative Commons)

SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA: Elon Musk has offered to bankroll the legal defense of any survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's crime ring if they are sued for publicly naming their abusers.

The Tesla and SpaceX boss made the pledge late Sunday, February 8, while responding to conservative commentator Matt Walsh.

Walsh had taken aim at a Super Bowl public service announcement featuring Epstein victims.

Matt Walsh questions Jeffrey Epstein victims’ strategy

Walsh argued that the women behind the campaign already know the names of powerful figures tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network, but are choosing a "publicity campaign" instead of saying those names out loud.

The Daily Wire host shared the Super Bowl ad and commented, “I’m all for releasing the files. These women could also just name their abusers at any time. Instead they’ve embarked on a months-long publicity campaign which curiously didn’t start until the exact moment Biden left office.”

He added that the participants "profess to know the names of child r*pists in the most powerful positions in society yet they won’t tell us. They’ll even take out a Super Bowl ad while claiming to be silenced, even though they’re the ones refusing to give us the information they say they have.’”



Walsh also addressed the most common defense offered by supporters of the campaign.

“For those claiming that they can’t name names because they’ll be sued: they could simply give the names to any of their many (and mostly very recent) advocates in Congress, who could read the names out loud from the floor, insulating themselves and these women from any litigation. But they refuse to do that. Why?” Walsh asked.



Elon Musk offers legal shield for public accusations

Musk responded directly to Walsh’s thread and promised, “I will pay for the defense of anyone who speaks the truth about this and is sued for doing so.” The post racked up tens of thousands of likes within hours.

One of the most frequently cited reasons for survivors avoiding public accusations is the risk of defamation litigation.



Musk’s offer aligns with his longstanding push for transparency around the Epstein files

Legal experts have previously noted that members of Congress are protected under the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause when making statements on the House or Senate floor.

Private citizens, however, enjoy no such protection when making direct public accusations.

Epstein survivors’ Super Bowl ad presses DOJ for answers

The controversy centers on a Super Bowl Sunday PSA released by World Without Exploitation, a group advocating for survivors of sex trafficking. The ad featured several identified Epstein survivors, including Annie Farmer.

In the video, Farmer holds a photograph of herself as a teenager and says, “After years of being kept apart, we’re standing together.”



Viewers were urged to pressure the Justice Department, with the ad calling on the public to contact Attorney General Pam Bondi. “Stand With Us. Tell Attorney General Pam Bondi it’s time for the truth," the message concluded.

Survivors involved in the campaign have insisted that millions of pages tied to the Epstein investigation remain unreleased or heavily redacted, despite DOJ claims that disclosures are complete.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Megyn Kelly criticized Scott Jennings for 'parroting' the administration’s claim that Iran was planning preemptive missile strikes on the US
10 hours ago
Levin accused Carlson of engaging in 'fearmongering' and 'back-stabbing of our president'
16 hours ago
Chuck Todd argued that the factor that had made JD Vance unique- his 'America First' credentials- was now 'non-existent' after the strikes
16 hours ago
Bret Baier said President Trump compared recent US actions in Venezuela to possible plans to increase pressure on Iran's leadership
19 hours ago
Bongino tells Laura Ingraham Iran 'acted like they had a full house' despite weakness
21 hours ago
The reporter, identified as Vinny Martorano was covering a pro-Trump crowd at the Texas Capitol in Austin, where demonstrators had gathered following the Iran strikes
1 day ago
Wearing a white 'USA' cap, SNL's James Austin Johnson’s Trump cheerfully opened with 'Good evening, and happy World War III to all who celebrate'
1 day ago
'As Americans, the freedom of Iranians is not our responsibility. If a single American life is lost in the service of that goal, it will be a travesty,' Matt Walsh said
1 day ago
'I am a Democrat. I have been a huge Democrat. I am incredibly disappointed with my party. I do not see myself in them in this moment,' Moj Mahdara said
1 day ago
Scott Jennings said that very senior administration officials 'had intelligence that the [Iranian] regime was going to fire missiles into US military'
1 day ago