Here's how Trump's classified documents case could've played out differently if held in DC and not Florida

Prosecutors' decision to charge Trump in Florida rather than DC has significantly influenced progression of the case
PUBLISHED MAY 28, 2024
The bulk of evidence against Trump in the documents case was collected by a DC federal grand jury. (Getty Images)
The bulk of evidence against Trump in the documents case was collected by a DC federal grand jury. (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: The decision by federal prosecutors to bring charges against former President Donald Trump for mishandling classified documents in Florida rather than Washington DC has had profound implications on how the high-profile case has unfolded.

Recently unsealed court opinions from two respected DC federal judges revealed a vastly different approach than the one taken by the Florida judge overseeing Trump's case, Judge Aileen Cannon, as per CNN.

Unsealing of opinions from DC federal judges highlight contrasting judicial approaches

Before federal prosecutors indicted Trump last year for allegedly mishandling classified documents, they faced a crucial decision: where to bring the charges - Washington, DC, or Florida.

This choice has had significant ramifications, as the contrasting judicial approaches in these two jurisdictions have become increasingly evident.

The recent unsealing of opinions from two DC federal judges — Chief Judge James "Jeb" Boasberg and his predecessor, Judge Beryl Howell — highlight how the case might have progressed more swiftly and harshly for Trump had it remained in Washington.

These opinions revealed a stark contrast in handling questions of attorney-client privilege and grand jury secrecy compared to the approach of the federal judge now presiding over the case in Florida, Cannon.

Despite Special Counsel Jack Smith indicting Trump nearly a year ago, the case has stalled due to Cannon’s reluctance to rule on various issues, making a pre-election trial unlikely.

Adding to the complexity, prosecutors recently requested that Cannon impose a gag order on Trump to prevent him from misleadingly suggesting that the FBI was prepared to use deadly force against him during the 2022 Mar-a-Lago search — a matter that DC judges have already addressed in other cases.

(Getty Images)
Unsealing of opinions from DC federal judges highlight contrasting judicial approaches. (Getty Images)

Florida judge Aileen Cannon is revisiting fundamental issues in classified documents case

The bulk of evidence against Trump in the documents case was collected by a DC federal grand jury, which continued its work months after the FBI seized hundreds of classified documents from Mar-a-Lago.

However, the Justice Department moved the investigation to a Miami grand jury in its final weeks, given that many of Trump’s alleged actions occurred at his Palm Beach, Florida, residence.

Prosecutors have been tight-lipped about the decision to shift the case to Florida, but it has been a contentious point in legal battles. Defense teams have leveraged this move, hoping Cannon would scrutinize the prosecutors' decisions more favorably than the DC judges might have.

Cannon is now revisiting fundamental issues that Howell and Boasberg had already ruled on, including the use of testimony from Trump’s former attorney, Evan Corcoran.

Howell had previously determined that Corcoran’s communications with Trump were not protected by attorney-client privilege due to the crime-fraud exception, leading to crucial testimony for the indictment.

This precedent provided Cannon with a clear roadmap for handling similar privilege issues, but she has yet to schedule a hearing on the matter.

Judge Aileen Cannon is overseeing Donald Trump's classified documents case (Wikimedia Commons)
Florida judge Aileen Cannon is revisiting fundamental issues in classified documents case. (Wikimedia Commons)

Aileen Cannon has limited judicial experience in comparison to seasoned DC judges

Cannon, a Trump appointee with limited judicial experience, contrasts sharply with the seasoned DC judges. Boasberg, who has extensive experience in national security matters, previously served as chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, overseeing sensitive intelligence issues.

Howell, an Obama appointee, is well-versed in attorney-client privilege disputes and has authored numerous opinions on politically charged investigations.

Former U.S. President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivers remarks at a Nevada Republican volunteer recruiting event at Fervent: A Calvary Chapel on July 8, 2023 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Trump is the current frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination amid a growing field of candidates.
Federal prosecutors indicted Donald Trump last year for allegedly mishandling classified documents. (Getty Images)

Cannon, appointed in late 2020, has presided over only four criminal trials and initially lacked the necessary facilities to handle classified documents securely.

This inexperience is evident in her prolonged handling of classified records issues in Trump’s case, with major disputes still unresolved.

Legal experts, like Bradley Moss, criticize Cannon’s slow pace, noting that Howell and Boasberg managed similar issues with greater efficiency and precision.

Moss emphasized that the DC judges’ experience with high-stakes litigation, particularly Howell’s rulings on attorney-client privilege in the context of grand jury investigations, underscores the differences in judicial competence and approach.

MORE STORIES

On Tuesday, Senate Democrats blocked the GOP's eighth attempt to reopen the government
1 day ago
California already allows trans athletes to compete in school sports based on their gender identity
2 days ago
Pete Hegseth says 'Pentagon access is a privilege, not a right' as top outlets reject new media restrictions and risk losing credentials
2 days ago
Donald Trump said a very wealthy donor offered to personally cover troop pay if government shutdown funds fall short
2 days ago
The six people are from Argentina, Brazil, Germany, Mexico, Paraguay, and South Africa
2 days ago
President Donald Trump blamed Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer for the shutdown and confirmed ending several Democrat-backed federal programs
4 days ago
Donald Trump criticized Chuck Schumer over the shutdown and said he directed Pete Hegseth to use funds to ensure troops are paid on October 15
6 days ago
Several progressives who have long called for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas have not yet commented on the agreement’s terms or timeline
7 days ago
Trump posted a scathing montage, accusing Democrats of shutting down the government to please their 'radical left' base
Oct 9, 2025
John Kennedy is calling out Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer over the tough spot he’s in amid government shutdown
Oct 9, 2025