'He's drowning!' Internet divided as Laura Ingraham reveals Biden's debate strategy and weaknesses

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: Fox News host Laura Ingraham recently dissected the Biden team's call for a "game-changer" ahead of the presidential debates on her show, 'The Ingraham Angle.'

Ingraham's analysis sheds light on the perceived vulnerabilities within the Biden campaign and the strategic shifts being made in anticipation of critical moments in the election cycle.

Biden campaign's pivot from tradition to embrace Trump's debate proposal

During her segment, Ingraham emphasized the Biden campaign's shift away from its previous "Comeback Kid" narrative. She noted the campaign's decision to break from the traditional debate format and consider earlier debates, a move suggested by former President Trump.

Moreover, Ingraham pointed out the selection of CNN anchors as moderators for the first debate. She highlighted that one of them had previously expressed views indicating opposition to Trump's presidency.

Ingraham remarked, “Today, we learned a few new things about the true state of the Biden campaign."

"The fact that they decided to abandon the usual debate format that they were demanding and take up Trump's call for earlier debates, shows that they think they need a game-changer, and they hope that they will get it with the help of two CNN anchors, who we learned today will be the ones who are actually moderating the first debate. One believes that electing Trump would be anti-democratic,” she added.

Slate's commentary challenges Biden's electoral narrative

Ingraham also referenced commentary from Slate, a prominent media outlet known for its alignment with liberal perspectives.

She stated, “The Biden team is nervous, and one of their go-to house media organs, Slate, is also sending up a signal flare, warning the Democrats can't keep rationalizing away one crucial element of the race — that Biden does better with people who are most likely to vote — because new polling shows that that's not true.”

In concluding her analysis, Ingraham encapsulated the sentiment by quoting, "How bad is this, really? Pretty bad!"

This statement reflects her evaluation of the challenges confronting the Biden campaign and the urgency with which they are seeking a potential turnaround.

She also included, "This is my favorite part of all: '[I]f the question is, ‘How bad is this, really?’ the answer is, 'Pretty bad!'"

Social media floods with mixed reaction 

Amid discussions on social media platforms, various perspectives emerge regarding the potential impact of debates on electoral outcomes.

One user wrote, "Remember Fetterman poor performance on debate with Dr. Oz? It did not keep him from winning so do t count on Biden fumbling on debate to change votes." [sic]

Another said, "Damn you’ve actually turned into petrified wood."

One user commented, "She brought binoculars into the courtroom. What a scab."

Another replied, "Sorry Laura he has no soul to save."

One said, "It's Biden's last possible attempt to save face. Let's face it though...Biden has no clue wtf is going on but his handlers do and they will do anything and everything they can to help him.

"- Earpiece in telling him what to say. - debate mods cutting Trump off - disparaging remarks in jest as the former president finishes his statements. - praising the current president after every response. - backhanded remarks toward Trump as a build up to all of his questions It's gonna be dirty but... (we still win in the end)," the user added. [sic]

Another added, "He´s drowning!"

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.