Hunter Biden judge delivers major setbacks to defense in gun trial but Internet says 'it's all a show'

WILMINGTON, DELAWARE: The federal judge overseeing Hunter Biden’s gun trial issued two significant rulings on Sunday, June 2, that could complicate his defense as the trial begins.

The rulings blocked one of Biden’s expert witnesses and excluded a key piece of evidence, adding to the challenges he faces in a case that has drawn substantial public and media attention.

Expert witness blocked and key evidence excluded in Hunter Biden gun trial

Judge Maryellen Noreika granted a request from special counsel David Weiss to prevent Dr Elie Aoun, a psychiatrist from Columbia University, from testifying on behalf of Biden.

The defense had hoped Dr Aoun would cast doubt on the prosecution’s claims that Biden knew he was an addict when he purchased the gun in 2018.

“The inadequacy of Defendant’s expert disclosure for Dr Aoun leaves the government in the dark as to what his opinions about the facts of this case will be, thus rendering the government unable to prepare for trial,” Noreika stated in her ruling.

This decision denies the defense a crucial opportunity to challenge the assertion that Hunter Biden knowingly lied about his drug use on the federal firearms form he filled out when purchasing the gun.

Dr Aoun's testimony was intended to provide a nuanced understanding of addiction and its effects on a person’s self-awareness and decision-making abilities.

In another blow to the defense, Judge Noreika also ruled that an altered version of the federal firearms form, which Biden’s lawyers argued was essential to their case, was inadmissible.

This form, allegedly altered by gun store employees in 2021, was intended to undermine the credibility of the employees, who are expected to testify for the prosecution.

Noreika dismissed the defense's argument, stating that the altered form was “irrelevant and inadmissible” and criticized Biden’s legal team for introducing “conspiratorial” theories and “unsupported rhetoric” about the motivations of the gun store employees.

“Any probative value it arguably has is substantially outweighed by a danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, and misleading the jury,” she wrote. Noreika further emphasized that using the altered form to suggest political bias would be “unduly prejudicial and invites (jury) nullification.”

Only the original form, ATF Form 4473, will be presented to the jury. On this form, Biden is accused of falsely swearing that he was not using or addicted to drugs at the time of purchase. Prosecutors argue that he was still addicted to crack cocaine, as he has detailed in his memoir, CNN reported.

Social media reacts to latest rulings on Hunter Biden case

The rulings have sparked significant reactions on social media.

"I cannot understand why he doesn't just plead guilty and get it over with, instead of dragging out old dirty laundry that will be all over the news for weeks. He admits he was using drugs, multiple witnesses are going to say so too, there's a paper trail for the gun," one posted on X.

"It’s all a show since he will be pardoned by his father. It’s an act to make it seem they aren’t biased," another insisted.

"He will get a slap on the wrist. Democrats are above the law," a comment read.

"If this were you or I, we would have been in prison years ago," someone else offered.

"This case is a false flag. @JoeBiden & @TheDemocrats will gladly allow Hunter’s conviction on a relatively minor gun charge so they can claim “the justice system is working” & “no one is above the law” And falsely equate Hunter‘s case with @realDonaldTrump’s case. Don’t buy it," another chimed in.

 

 

 

 

Legal and political implications of Hunter Biden case

These setbacks come at a critical juncture, as jury selection is set to begin on Monday morning in Wilmington. The case has not only legal but also political ramifications, given Hunter Biden’s high-profile status as the son of President Joe Biden.

Hunter Biden has pleaded not guilty to the charges of illegally purchasing and possessing a firearm while using illicit drugs. The prosecution’s case hinges on proving that he knowingly lied about his drug use on the ATF Form 4473, a federal offense.

The exclusion of Dr Aoun’s testimony and the altered firearms form limits the defense’s strategies, making it more challenging to counter the prosecution's narrative. The trial will now proceed without these elements.

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.