John Fetterman breaks ranks to back Trump Greenland takeover plan
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA: Democratic Senator John Fetterman broke with his party to publicly support President Donald Trump’s controversial proposal to acquire Greenland, a move that has unsettled lawmakers across the political spectrum. Fetterman praised the strategic value of the Arctic territory and framed the idea as a long-standing national security discussion rather than a radical departure in US foreign policy.
While many Democrats have dismissed Trump’s comments as reckless or imperialistic, Fetterman struck a notably different tone, arguing that Greenland holds significant military and geopolitical importance for the United States. His remarks placed him alongside a small group of lawmakers willing to entertain an idea that has largely been rejected by party leadership.
John Fetterman's views on acquiring Greenland
Fetterman laid out his position in a post on X on Wednesday, January 7, echoing arguments made by some Republicans while distancing himself from any suggestion of military coercion.
“I believe Greenland has massive strategic benefits for the United States,” Fetterman wrote. “I do not support taking it by force. America is not a bully.”
I believe Greenland has massive strategic benefits for the United States.
— U.S. Senator John Fetterman (@SenFettermanPA) January 7, 2026
I do not support taking it by force.
America is not a bully.
Ideally, we purchase it—similar to our purchases of Alaska or the Louisiana Purchase.
Acquiring Greenland is a many decades old conversation.
He went on to say that a purchase would be the preferred route, drawing comparisons to historic territorial acquisitions. “Ideally, we purchase it—similar to our purchases of Alaska or the Louisiana Purchase,” he wrote, adding that “acquiring Greenland is a many decades old conversation.”
The comments quickly drew attention, with critics accusing Fetterman of legitimizing Trump’s rhetoric, while supporters said he was engaging with the issue pragmatically rather than ideologically.
Trump revives Greenland focus after Venezuela operation
BREAKING: - Trump just now:
— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) January 5, 2026
"We Need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and the European Union needs us to have it and they know that."
The European Union literally has Greenland.
Why the F--k would they need us to have it, you authoritarian imbecile? pic.twitter.com/AranFSVc4F
Trump’s renewed interest in Greenland followed the controversial US military operation in Venezuela that led to the capture of President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. In the days after the operation, Trump and his allies signaled a more expansive view of American power, extending beyond South America.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said the United States needed Greenland "from the standpoint of national security.” He added that the issue was well understood by US allies, despite confusion and criticism from European officials and commentators.
The White House later told Reuters that acquiring Greenland was considered a national security priority. According to the statement, the administration was reviewing a range of options to pursue the goal, noting that all tools available to the commander-in-chief remained on the table.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers on Monday, January 5, that the administration was not seeking to invade Greenland but was exploring the possibility of purchasing the territory instead.
John Fetterman record of crossing party lines
voting record and in his willingness to engage with figures aligned with the MAGA movement. His approach has earned him a reputation as an unpredictable voice within the party.
In June, the Pennsylvania senator was seen socializing with Trump ally and conservative strategist Steve Bannon at a dinner in Washington. Last year, Fetterman described Trump as “kind and cordial” following a meeting at Mar-a-Lago, remarks that drew backlash from progressive activists.
He was also one of only eight lawmakers to vote to end the government shutdown in November, despite Democrats failing to secure an extension for Affordable Care Act subsidies, a decision that further strained his relationship with party leadership.