Jonathan Turley says Trump's civil fraud judgment appeal will test 'integrity' of New York legal system on 'Fox & Friends'

Jonathan Turley asserted Trump's appeal would help the court to finally evaluate the 'obscene' $454 million New York civil fraud case judgment
UPDATED APR 3, 2024
Jonathan Turley discusses the proceedings of Donald Trump's New York civil fraud case on (Fox News/YouTube)
Jonathan Turley discusses the proceedings of Donald Trump's New York civil fraud case on (Fox News/YouTube)

NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK: Fox contributor Jonathan Turley, a conservative attorney and legal scholar, joined 'Fox & Friends' co-hosts to discuss the latest happenings in Donald Trump's New York civil fraud case on Tuesday, April 2.

The former president is set to appeal the $454 million judgment after managing to secure the $175 million bond, successfully preventing the state from seizing his assets.



 

Jonathan Turley slams Judge Arthur Engoron for ordering Donald Trump to pay an astronomical penalty in the New York civil fraud case

Turley ridiculed the February ruling against Trump by New York Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron, stating that securing bond "clears the way for the court to finally look at what many of us view as an obscene judgment. I mean, this number was pulled out of nowhere. When you drill down on the order, there’s really nothing there."

He shared, "The court basically makes a series of assumptions, in my view speculations, on how much he saved. But there were no victims here. There wasn’t a single penny that was lost by anyone. The banks testified that they wanted more business for Trump. So to come up with this astronomical figure really shocks the conscience."

Jonathan Turley questions the integrity of the legal system

Turley went so far as to suggest that the rules of the judicial system were seemingly different for the prosecution of Trump. 

He asserted, "There's no justification, in my view, in the order. So that's going to go up, and these judges are gonna have to look at it. And quite frankly, I think the integrity of the New York legal system is at stake here." 

The legal scholar claimed, "You know, you can't just have a special criminal, or in this case, civil code for Trump. It has to be consistent. And when you're the leading business law jurisdiction in the world, this has really put a shell below the waterline." 

"I mean, a lot of people are looking at this and saying, 'But for the grace of God go I. Am I going to be the next person that gets tagged by someone like James?'" further remarked Turley, mentioning New York Attorney General Letitia James, who initiated the civil fraud case investigations against Trump. 

The Appellate Division of the NY Supreme Court has stated that it would hear Trump's arguments in September, but a specific date is yet to be set. If he manages to overturn the ruling, Trump will get the bond money back in addition to not paying the state any further.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Donald Trump said his win despite 93–97% negative press shows people don’t trust media, calling it bad for the country
6 hours ago
Marco Rubio added that the final decision on whether the US remains in NATO would rest with Donald Trump, who has previously criticized the alliance
6 hours ago
Nancy Pelosi said she’s overcredited for Joe Biden’s exit, while praising his record and defending her advice
7 hours ago
Ths US Rep also mentioned that authorities have to be 'on guard' since Republicans will allegedly try to disrupt upcoming elections.
7 hours ago
The former House Speaker hailed Clinton as a once-in-a-generation talent while taking a pointed jab at Trump
7 hours ago
Donald Trump and Kristi Noem accused Joe Biden and officials of allowing unchecked immigration with serious consequences
8 hours ago
Marco Rubio warned US will push Iran into the ‘stone age’
8 hours ago
According to Rob Bonta, ending the conflict would be a more effective solution than expanding offshore drilling or restarting pipeline operations
9 hours ago
Voting law experts say the order could bring up constitutional concerns, as it touches on powers usually handled by states
9 hours ago
Donald Trump said 'I’m going' to court, though he has reversed before, and argued the 14th Amendment applies to former slaves’ children
9 hours ago