Jonathan Turley says Trump's civil fraud judgment appeal will test 'integrity' of New York legal system on 'Fox & Friends'

Jonathan Turley asserted Trump's appeal would help the court to finally evaluate the 'obscene' $454 million New York civil fraud case judgment
UPDATED APR 3, 2024
Jonathan Turley discusses the proceedings of Donald Trump's New York civil fraud case on (Fox News/YouTube)
Jonathan Turley discusses the proceedings of Donald Trump's New York civil fraud case on (Fox News/YouTube)

NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK: Fox contributor Jonathan Turley, a conservative attorney and legal scholar, joined 'Fox & Friends' co-hosts to discuss the latest happenings in Donald Trump's New York civil fraud case on Tuesday, April 2.

The former president is set to appeal the $454 million judgment after managing to secure the $175 million bond, successfully preventing the state from seizing his assets.



 

Jonathan Turley slams Judge Arthur Engoron for ordering Donald Trump to pay an astronomical penalty in the New York civil fraud case

Turley ridiculed the February ruling against Trump by New York Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron, stating that securing bond "clears the way for the court to finally look at what many of us view as an obscene judgment. I mean, this number was pulled out of nowhere. When you drill down on the order, there’s really nothing there."

He shared, "The court basically makes a series of assumptions, in my view speculations, on how much he saved. But there were no victims here. There wasn’t a single penny that was lost by anyone. The banks testified that they wanted more business for Trump. So to come up with this astronomical figure really shocks the conscience."

Jonathan Turley questions the integrity of the legal system

Turley went so far as to suggest that the rules of the judicial system were seemingly different for the prosecution of Trump. 

He asserted, "There's no justification, in my view, in the order. So that's going to go up, and these judges are gonna have to look at it. And quite frankly, I think the integrity of the New York legal system is at stake here." 

The legal scholar claimed, "You know, you can't just have a special criminal, or in this case, civil code for Trump. It has to be consistent. And when you're the leading business law jurisdiction in the world, this has really put a shell below the waterline." 

"I mean, a lot of people are looking at this and saying, 'But for the grace of God go I. Am I going to be the next person that gets tagged by someone like James?'" further remarked Turley, mentioning New York Attorney General Letitia James, who initiated the civil fraud case investigations against Trump. 

The Appellate Division of the NY Supreme Court has stated that it would hear Trump's arguments in September, but a specific date is yet to be set. If he manages to overturn the ruling, Trump will get the bond money back in addition to not paying the state any further.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Rising oil prices and falling stocks reflected investor concerns over prolonged conflict and potential disruptions to global energy supply
13 minutes ago
Trump derided Macron’s personal life while claiming France and NATO failed to back US military efforts in the Iran conflict
6 hours ago
The President also argued that states should fund daycare so the federal government can focus on ‘military protection’
7 hours ago
The Bulwark publisher compared Trump's address to the nation speech to a live and spoken version of his Truth Social posts.
8 hours ago
Ilhan Omar emphasized that the lack of funding has had wide-ranging consequences beyond immigration enforcement
8 hours ago
Calls for Pam Bondi’s resignation grew after the Justice Department’s Epstein files release led Republicans to subpoena her over redactions
8 hours ago
Trump plans to restore the Reflecting Pool and defend privately funded White House projects amid legal challenges
8 hours ago
According to Brett McGurk, the tone of Donald Trump's speech also signaled potential escalation rather than de-escalation
9 hours ago
Crow says Trump’s address didn’t explain how or when the Iran conflict will end, fueling criticism that key details and timelines were missing
9 hours ago
Donald Trump stated that the United States could withdraw from Iran 'pretty quickly,' potentially within two to three weeks
9 hours ago