Jonathan Turley says Trump's civil fraud judgment appeal will test 'integrity' of New York legal system on 'Fox & Friends'

Jonathan Turley asserted Trump's appeal would help the court to finally evaluate the 'obscene' $454 million New York civil fraud case judgment
Jonathan Turley discusses the proceedings of Donald Trump's New York civil fraud case on (Fox News/YouTube)
Jonathan Turley discusses the proceedings of Donald Trump's New York civil fraud case on (Fox News/YouTube)

NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK: Fox contributor Jonathan Turley, a conservative attorney and legal scholar, joined 'Fox & Friends' co-hosts to discuss the latest happenings in Donald Trump's New York civil fraud case on Tuesday, April 2.

The former president is set to appeal the $454 million judgment after managing to secure the $175 million bond, successfully preventing the state from seizing his assets.



 

Jonathan Turley slams Judge Arthur Engoron for ordering Donald Trump to pay an astronomical penalty in the New York civil fraud case

Turley ridiculed the February ruling against Trump by New York Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron, stating that securing bond "clears the way for the court to finally look at what many of us view as an obscene judgment. I mean, this number was pulled out of nowhere. When you drill down on the order, there’s really nothing there."

He shared, "The court basically makes a series of assumptions, in my view speculations, on how much he saved. But there were no victims here. There wasn’t a single penny that was lost by anyone. The banks testified that they wanted more business for Trump. So to come up with this astronomical figure really shocks the conscience."

Jonathan Turley questions the integrity of the legal system

Turley went so far as to suggest that the rules of the judicial system were seemingly different for the prosecution of Trump. 

He asserted, "There's no justification, in my view, in the order. So that's going to go up, and these judges are gonna have to look at it. And quite frankly, I think the integrity of the New York legal system is at stake here." 

The legal scholar claimed, "You know, you can't just have a special criminal, or in this case, civil code for Trump. It has to be consistent. And when you're the leading business law jurisdiction in the world, this has really put a shell below the waterline." 

"I mean, a lot of people are looking at this and saying, 'But for the grace of God go I. Am I going to be the next person that gets tagged by someone like James?'" further remarked Turley, mentioning New York Attorney General Letitia James, who initiated the civil fraud case investigations against Trump. 

The Appellate Division of the NY Supreme Court has stated that it would hear Trump's arguments in September, but a specific date is yet to be set. If he manages to overturn the ruling, Trump will get the bond money back in addition to not paying the state any further.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Gretchen Whitmer, former VP Kamala Harris and other women are widely speculated to be potential candidates in the 2028 Democratic presidential primary
2026-10-25T21:55:26.000Z
Attorney General Todd Blanche refused to identify whom Trump meant when he claimed he ordered a DOJ lawsuit over Alaska's Senate race
2026-10-25T20:46:10.000Z
President Donald Trump has repeatedly targeted Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed with inflammatory language during the 2026 campaign trail, labeling him a 'radical extremist' and other.
2026-10-25T19:24:12.000Z
Democratic Senator Adam Schiff called out the conflicting claims by President Donald Trump, Starlink’s operator SpaceX’s owner Elon Musk, and Ukrainian President Zelensky, saying 'somebody is lying'
2026-10-25T17:35:46.000Z
Donald Trump accused Murkowski of opposing the lawsuit, which he argued could help prevent votes from being diverted from the Republican incumbent to the other candidate with a similar name
2026-10-25T16:10:22.000Z
Susan Collins, Abdul El-Sayed, James Talarico and Jon Ossoff face voter concerns over affordability, health care, Iran and Donald Trump's influence
2026-10-25T08:08:10.000Z
Barack Obama questioned Pete Hegseth’s priorities, suggesting his focus on troops’ appearances distracted from more pressing military responsibilities
2026-10-25T06:41:45.000Z
Vivek Ramaswamy defended his controversial ad featuring Amy Acton’s estranged mother, accusing Acton of attacking his mother
2026-10-25T05:15:22.000Z
Elon Musk defended SpaceX’s decision, arguing that Starlink is a civilian commercial service and was never intended to support offensive drone strikes
2026-10-25T04:29:36.000Z
Ilhan Omar hired former Joe Biden attorney Amy Jeffress and Trump impeachment lawyer Joshua Matz amid a federal probe into her immigration history
2026-10-25T03:39:35.000Z