Supreme Court closes door on Trump's birthright citizenship case after missed rehearing deadline

The court's ruling wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Samuel Alito dissented
President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting about military families in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, Aug. 3, 2026, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting about military families in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, Aug. 3, 2026, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

WASHINGTON, DC: The Supreme Court put a final stamp on its June decision, rejecting President Trump’s push to end birthright citizenship. The Trump administration missed its 25-day window to ask for a rehearing, so the case is officially over.

Back in June, the justices voted 6-3 to strike down Trump’s executive order. That ruling kept a lower court decision in place, one that blocked Trump’s attempt to deny automatic citizenship to kids born in the US, even if their parents are here illegally or just temporarily.

A long-shot rehearing that never came

"I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY," the 80-year-old president declared on Truth Social last month.



"This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don't change their absolutely insane decision."

But that deadline came and went without the Trump administration submitting such a filing.

Now, the Supreme Court has put the final nail in the coffin, issuing a certified judgment and affirming a lower court ruling that had blocked the president's executive order seeking to ban automatic citizenship to children born on US soil to parents in the country temporarily or illegally.

A rehearing was a long shot from the start.

For that to happen, at least one justice who ruled against Trump would have to flip, plus a majority of the court would need to agree to take another look.

President Donald Trump leaves the U.S. Supreme Court, Wednesday, April 1, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
President Donald Trump leaves the US Supreme Court, Wednesday, April 1, 2026, in Washington (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

The Supreme Court hasn't reopened an argued case like this in over half a century. Still, Trump made this case a cornerstone of his second-term agenda.

He even broke tradition by showing up in person at the Supreme Court oral arguments in April, the first sitting president to do so, where he listened as justices, some of whom he appointed, grilled his solicitor general about the administration’s arguments.

The court was divided

The court didn’t agree across the board.

Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Samuel Alito dissented; they actually favored the administration’s take on the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause.

(Getty Images)
Supreme Court was not united in its opposition to Trump’s efforts to gut the citizenship protections guaranteed under the 14th Amendment (Getty Images)

Brett Kavanaugh went along with the majority, but he threw in a partial dissent. He said that Trump’s order didn’t break the Constitution directly, but it did clash with federal law.

After the court issued its ruling in June, Trump suggested that Congress “can easily make it up” with legislation to end birthright citizenship, saying, “No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary!”

That claim just doesn’t stand up given the way the ruling came down.

The majority based their decision on the Constitution, not on how they read the law, so the only way to overturn it now is with a constitutional amendment, not just a law from Congress.

After the June ruling, Trump suggested Congress could sidestep the court by passing legislation to end birthright citizenship (Getty Images)
After the June ruling, Trump suggested Congress could sidestep the court by passing legislation to end birthright citizenship (Getty Images)

With the court’s judgment officially logged and no chance for rehearing left, this case really is over. This was one of the administration’s most high-profile legal battles, but now the 14th Amendment’s citizenship protections stay exactly as they are.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Donald Trump renewed his dispute with Jeanine Pirro after her office blamed faulty construction for damage to the newly renovated landmark
12 minutes ago
Greene also accused the administration of sidelining US intelligence assessments that found Iran was not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon
2 hours ago
'The deep problem here is that this administration did not plan for this war, did not plan how to get out of this war', Ruben Gallego said
6 hours ago
Jared Kushner was joined by Nickolay Mladenov and Tony Blair, while Hamas leader Khalil al-Hayya attended with Egyptian, Qatari, and Turkish officials
7 hours ago
Kristen Welker asked Todd Blanche if he would follow Trump if asked to cross 'an ethical or legal line', but Blanche said the president never would
7 hours ago
The attorney general addressed concerns over his transition from Trump's personal lawyer to the Justice Department
8 hours ago
James Carville said Democrats should not just celebrate reclaiming seats but pressure Republicans on popular issues and seek broader voter support
10 hours ago
Beshear says the longtime senator still has a responsibility to assure Kentuckians he can carry out his role
10 hours ago
Bill Cassidy said more doses would force parents to take six leaves instead of two and insurers to cover six visits, exhausting premiums
11 hours ago
The attorney general defended the DC prosecutor while acknowledging the president’s frustration over her handling of the case
12 hours ago