'Traitors should be afraid': FBI probe on threats to Colorado SC judges following Trump ballot ban leaves Internet divided

The judges have been the targets of vicious online threats since December 19 when the court ruled that Trump is ineligible for the ballot
PUBLISHED DEC 26, 2023
FBI and Colorado law enforcement have launched an investigation into threats made against state Supreme Court justices who ruled against Donald Trump (Getty Image and KTLA/YouTube)
FBI and Colorado law enforcement have launched an investigation into threats made against state Supreme Court justices who ruled against Donald Trump (Getty Image and KTLA/YouTube)

DENVER, COLORADO: The FBI and Colorado law enforcement have launched an investigation into the threats made against the state Supreme Court justices who ruled to remove Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 presidential ballot.

The judges have been the targets of vicious online threats since December 19 when the court ruled that Trump is ineligible for the ballot under 14th Amendment concerns due to his alleged role in facilitating the Jan 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

The names of judges have appeared frequently in “incendiary” posts on such forums with calls to expose the judges’ personal data, according to an analysis of the online chatter prepared by one non-partisan research organization for US law enforcement agencies that was obtained by CNN.

In the wake of the furious threats, Vikki Migoya, a spokesperson for the FBI’s Denver field office, released a statement saying, “The FBI is aware of the situation and working with local law enforcement.”

“We will vigorously pursue investigations of any threat or use of violence committed by someone who uses extremist views to justify their actions regardless of motivation,” the statement read.

In a statement, the Colorado State Patrol, which guards the justices in the courtroom and other state buildings, acknowledged the FBI's efforts and promised to "assist with those investigations as necessary."

However, the patrol declined to comment on any further security steps that may be implemented in response to the threats, according to NBC News.

What did the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling say?

The Colorado Supreme Court rendered a landmark decision last week, ruling 4–3 that Trump isn’t an eligible presidential candidate because of the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” and therefore can’t appear on the state’s ballot when voters gather for the GOP primary scheduled there for March 5.

The decision will be put on hold until January 4 while Trump files an appeal with the US Supreme Court, which has the authority to rule on the matter nationwide.

Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for the Trump Campaign, attempted to characterize the 4-3 ruling by the state's highest court as political meddling meant to keep President Joe Biden from running against Trump in November.

Cheung also called the decision “flawed” and said they “will swiftly file an appeal to the United States Supreme Court and a concurrent request for a stay of this deeply undemocratic decision."

“We have full confidence that the US Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these unamerican lawsuits,” he continued.

Internet reacts to FBI’s investigation

The news of the FBI investigating threats against Colorado SC judges has garnered immense social media attention, with one user saying, “The traitors should be afraid.”

“I guess since they caught the Jan 5 pipe bomber and the SCOTUS leak they have some free time on their hands,” another user mocked. “Same ones that ignored the threats to the SCJ's,” a third trolled.

“FBI didn't seem to care when Scotus was being targeted and threatened. Only cares about the judges who push their narrative,” a fourth user attacked while a fifth wrote, “Sounds like a 2-year investigation incoming lol.”

“Imagine going to jail because you’re upset you can’t vote for a twice-impeached ex-President who tried to overthrow an election, and is now under 91 indictments (and counting),” another user said.



 



 



 



 



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online

MORE STORIES

Clay Higgins added he would support the bill only if the Senate amended it to better protect victims and uninvolved Americans
5 hours ago
A three-judge panel ordered Texas to use the 2021 map for 2026, dealing a major setback to President Donald Trump and Republican redistricting plans
6 hours ago
Near-unanimous vote followed pressure campaign from Democrats and dissident Republicans as Mike Johnson urged the Senate to fix 'serious deficiencies'
13 hours ago
Mike Johnson backed the Epstein bill but warned of 'deficiencies' that he said the Senate must fix, as these flaws could expose sensitive materials
16 hours ago
The DOJ sued California over new mask and ID laws for federal agents, arguing they violate the Supremacy Clause and endanger officers
1 day ago
Rae Huang slammed Mayor Karen Bass for her handling of homelessness and recent political violence, calling her own campaign a 'moment for change'
1 day ago
Donald Trump said holiday shoppers were seeing better deals, claiming Walmart’s Thanksgiving meal costs were about 25% lower than under Joe Biden
1 day ago
JD Vance says '30 million illegal immigrants' flooded the country under Joe Biden and drove up housing costs
4 days ago
Federal workers are finally relieved and national parks can reopen, but the Trump administration went a step further than taking a humble victory lap
5 days ago
Katherine Clark, in an interview with MSNBC’s Simone Sanders-Townsend, alleged Trump is trying to bury the truth about Epstein’s network
6 days ago