Trump admin ends federal Medicaid funding for youth gender care: 'Barbaric surgeries'

The Trump admin cited limited evidence for pediatric gender-affirming care and projected $235 million in Medicaid and CHIP savings over 10 years
The Trump administration finalized a rule ending federal Medicaid and CHIP funding for gender-affirming care for minors, effective October 13  (AP Photo, Getty Images)
The Trump administration finalized a rule ending federal Medicaid and CHIP funding for gender-affirming care for minors, effective October 13 (AP Photo, Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: The Trump administration on Tuesday, August 11, finalized a rule barring federal Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program funding for gender-affirming care for minors, including puberty blockers, hormone treatments, and surgeries.

The policy is scheduled to take effect on October 13 and applies to children under 18 enrolled in Medicaid and those under 19 covered by CHIP.

President Donald Trump has said he directed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr Mehmet Oz to implement the change. The rule does not prohibit the treatments themselves but prevents states from claiming federal funding for them through Medicaid and CHIP.

Trump administration defends Medicaid funding ban

Trump said in a post on Truth Social that the administration would not fund what he described as “barbaric surgeries and practices” involving minors and said the treatments could cause “unthinkable and irreversible harm to their young bodies.”



Oz similarly defended the policy, saying, “children deserve our protection, not experimental interventions that can have dangerous lifelong consequences."

"These procedures, including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones.. can carry serious risks, including infertility, diminished bone density, altered brain development, and other irreversible effects.”



The final rule cites what the administration describes as limited evidence supporting pediatric gender-affirming medical interventions and references a 2025 Department of Health and Human Services report, as well as a review from the United Kingdom.

The administration said the rule would affect federal funding under Medicaid and CHIP, programs that together cover about 35.5 million children in the United States.

CMS estimates the policy will reduce combined Medicaid and CHIP spending by about $235 million over 10 years, including approximately $138 million in federal funds and $97 million in state funds. 

The administration has also made the policy part of a broader effort to restrict federal support for gender-affirming care. At least 27 states have already enacted restrictions on such care for minors, while a number of major hospitals have stopped providing some of these treatments.

Donald Trump speaks at the National Republican Congressional Committee's (NRCC) annual fundraising dinner, Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at Union Station in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
Donald Trump speaks at the National Republican Congressional Committee's (NRCC) annual fundraising dinner, Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at Union Station in Washington (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

The rule includes a six-month transition period for minors who were already receiving hormone treatment through Medicaid or CHIP when the policy takes effect. It does not provide the same continuation period for surgeries or puberty blockers.

Trump has also urged voters to remember the policy during the November midterm elections.

Medical groups challenge Trump funding rule

The new rule is expected to face legal challenges from states and advocacy groups.

Democratic state attorneys general previously challenged an earlier version of the policy, arguing that the federal government was exceeding its authority and interfering with states’ ability to regulate medical care.

GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders Legal Director Josh Rovenger said the rule “is putting up barriers between parents and their ability to make the best medical decisions for their children” and said it would face a legal challenge.

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 04: Transgender rights supporters takes part in a rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court as the high court hears arguments in a case on transgender health rights on December 04, 2024 in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in US v. Skrmetti, a case about Tennessee's law banning gender-affirming care for minors and if it violates the Constitution’s equal protection guarantee. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Transgender rights supporters takes part in a rally outside of the US Supreme Court as the high court hears arguments in a case on transgender health rights on December 04, 2024 in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson also criticized the policy, saying the administration is threatening "trans youth and their families with these kinds of actions, and it has to stop.”

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 04: Transgender rights opponents and a supporter rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments in a case on transgender health rights on December 04, 2024 in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in US v. Skrmetti, a case about Tennessee's law banning gender-affirming care for minors and if it violates the Constitution’s equal protection guarantee. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
 Transgender rights opponents and a supporter rally outside of the US Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments in a case on transgender health rights on December 04, 2024 in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

The final rule leaves states with different options depending on their existing laws.

Fourteen states have enacted so-called shield laws protecting access to gender-related care, meaning those jurisdictions could choose to continue coverage using state funds, while federal funding would remain available for mental health treatment related to gender dysphoria.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called Jared Kushner’s influence 'very bizarre' and urged transparency over his dealings and potential conflicts of interest
34 minutes ago
Abdul El-Sayed questioned why JD Vance would invoke his late grandfather to make an argument about him
1 hour ago
Daniel Driscoll moved up his resignation amid growing tensions with Pete Hegseth and Ricky Buria, who reportedly made his position untenable
1 hour ago
The Vice President fired back after the Michigan Democrat invoked his wife Usha Vance in a political exchange involving Vance's late grandfather
3 hours ago
The latest emergency appeal by the Republicans has the potential to influence the outcome of this year’s midterm elections.
8 hours ago
DHS has asked states to share voter rolls for audits and warned that it could withhold grant money from states that refuse
8 hours ago
CENTCOM developed the plan, which Pete Hegseth backed and sent to the White House several days ago
9 hours ago
Abdul El-Sayed said COVID had killed more Americans than 9/11 and hoped the next decade focused on public health and fighting poverty
10 hours ago
Sean Parnell did not dispute the objections but said they were consistent with the Pentagon’s process for receiving military advice
10 hours ago
'Very unfortunate that PM Carney has turned this into a political shouting match. I mean, we're not at war with Canada', Bessent said
11 hours ago