Trump admin ends federal Medicaid funding for youth gender care: 'Barbaric surgeries'

The Trump admin cited limited evidence for pediatric gender-affirming care and projected $235 million in Medicaid and CHIP savings over 10 years
The Trump administration finalized a rule ending federal Medicaid and CHIP funding for gender-affirming care for minors, effective October 13  (AP Photo, Getty Images)
The Trump administration finalized a rule ending federal Medicaid and CHIP funding for gender-affirming care for minors, effective October 13 (AP Photo, Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: The Trump administration on Tuesday, August 11, finalized a rule barring federal Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program funding for gender-affirming care for minors, including puberty blockers, hormone treatments, and surgeries.

The policy is scheduled to take effect on October 13 and applies to children under 18 enrolled in Medicaid and those under 19 covered by CHIP.

President Donald Trump has said he directed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr Mehmet Oz to implement the change. The rule does not prohibit the treatments themselves but prevents states from claiming federal funding for them through Medicaid and CHIP.

Trump administration defends Medicaid funding ban

Trump said in a post on Truth Social that the administration would not fund what he described as “barbaric surgeries and practices” involving minors and said the treatments could cause “unthinkable and irreversible harm to their young bodies.”



Oz similarly defended the policy, saying, “children deserve our protection, not experimental interventions that can have dangerous lifelong consequences."

"These procedures, including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones.. can carry serious risks, including infertility, diminished bone density, altered brain development, and other irreversible effects.”



The final rule cites what the administration describes as limited evidence supporting pediatric gender-affirming medical interventions and references a 2025 Department of Health and Human Services report, as well as a review from the United Kingdom.

The administration said the rule would affect federal funding under Medicaid and CHIP, programs that together cover about 35.5 million children in the United States.

CMS estimates the policy will reduce combined Medicaid and CHIP spending by about $235 million over 10 years, including approximately $138 million in federal funds and $97 million in state funds. 

The administration has also made the policy part of a broader effort to restrict federal support for gender-affirming care. At least 27 states have already enacted restrictions on such care for minors, while a number of major hospitals have stopped providing some of these treatments.

Donald Trump speaks at the National Republican Congressional Committee's (NRCC) annual fundraising dinner, Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at Union Station in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
Donald Trump speaks at the National Republican Congressional Committee's (NRCC) annual fundraising dinner, Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at Union Station in Washington (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

The rule includes a six-month transition period for minors who were already receiving hormone treatment through Medicaid or CHIP when the policy takes effect. It does not provide the same continuation period for surgeries or puberty blockers.

Trump has also urged voters to remember the policy during the November midterm elections.

Medical groups challenge Trump funding rule

The new rule is expected to face legal challenges from states and advocacy groups.

Democratic state attorneys general previously challenged an earlier version of the policy, arguing that the federal government was exceeding its authority and interfering with states’ ability to regulate medical care.

GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders Legal Director Josh Rovenger said the rule “is putting up barriers between parents and their ability to make the best medical decisions for their children” and said it would face a legal challenge.

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 04: Transgender rights supporters takes part in a rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court as the high court hears arguments in a case on transgender health rights on December 04, 2024 in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in US v. Skrmetti, a case about Tennessee's law banning gender-affirming care for minors and if it violates the Constitution’s equal protection guarantee. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Transgender rights supporters takes part in a rally outside of the US Supreme Court as the high court hears arguments in a case on transgender health rights on December 04, 2024 in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson also criticized the policy, saying the administration is threatening "trans youth and their families with these kinds of actions, and it has to stop.”

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 04: Transgender rights opponents and a supporter rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments in a case on transgender health rights on December 04, 2024 in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in US v. Skrmetti, a case about Tennessee's law banning gender-affirming care for minors and if it violates the Constitution’s equal protection guarantee. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
 Transgender rights opponents and a supporter rally outside of the US Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments in a case on transgender health rights on December 04, 2024 in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

The final rule leaves states with different options depending on their existing laws.

Fourteen states have enacted so-called shield laws protecting access to gender-related care, meaning those jurisdictions could choose to continue coverage using state funds, while federal funding would remain available for mental health treatment related to gender dysphoria.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Vice President JD Vance said further Iran discussions are expected at United Nations General Assembly while Trump prepares to meet Volodymyr Zelenskyy
1 hour ago
The 3 outlets sued in Washington, seeking to restore reporters' access and arguing that the administration violated the First and Fifth Amendment
1 hour ago
JD Vance defended the president's decision while rejecting claims that the outlets were being barred from reporting on the administration
2 hours ago
Xi Jinping's state visit comes after Trump's May visit to China, and, despite tensions between the countries, Trump praised him as a 'great leader'
3 hours ago
Trump's UN trip will proceed without the usual pooled presidential video feed after CNN was barred and the other networks declined to replace it
3 hours ago
Trump's remarks came a day after he urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to halt attacks on Russian refineries over diesel prices
4 hours ago
Trump escalated his media fight as CNN, MS NOW and Politico filed a federal lawsuit after their reporters were barred from presidential access
5 hours ago
Trump has publicly disagreed with the message in Maria Elvira Salazar’s campaign ad, saying she had 'got a little bit soft on the border'
13 hours ago
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the Pentagon’s casualty figures while questioning the newspaper’s reliance on anonymous officials for its report
15 hours ago
The planned talks come after Ukraine launched a large-scale drone attack on Moscow and Russia vowed to intensify strikes on Kyiv
15 hours ago