‘We’ll see you in court’: Federal workers sue Trump admin over gender-affirming care coverage ban

The lawsuit challenges a policy that bars federal workers' health insurance plans from covering medical and surgical care related to gender transition
The arm of the Human Rights Campaign that filed the lawsuit argues that the ban violates the federal prohibition on gender discrimination in the workplace.  (Getty Images)
The arm of the Human Rights Campaign that filed the lawsuit argues that the ban violates the federal prohibition on gender discrimination in the workplace.  (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: A human rights organization has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging its gender-affirming care coverage ban in federal workers’ health insurance plans.

The gender-affirming care coverage ban is a US policy prohibiting federal health insurance programs from covering expenses of medical and surgical procedures associated with gender transition.

Case filed for banning gender transition expenses

The arm of the Human Rights Campaign that filed the lawsuit argues that the ban violates the federal prohibition on gender discrimination in the workplace.  “Our message to the Trump administration is simple: We’ll see you in court,” Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson said in a statement.

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 17: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters after signing a proclamation in the Oval Office at the White House on April 17, 2025 in Washington, DC. The proclamation expands fishing rights in the Pacific Islands to an area he described as three times the size of California. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
US President Donald Trump speaks to reporters after signing a proclamation in the Oval Office at the White House on April 17, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

“Healthcare access should never be weaponized to advance discrimination — and the denial of coverage for critical healthcare based simply on who you are blatantly violates the rights of all of us,” Robinson continued.

At the beginning of this year, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) announced that it was suspending the insurance coverage for chemical and surgical procedures that aim to intervene with gender.

OPM manages health plans for federal workers and acts as a human resource department of the executive branch.

Five federal workers who are seeking such treatment for themselves or family members have brought this lawsuit against the administration.

“They are unable to pay out of pocket for the medically necessary gender-affirming procedures they need, are contemplating draining their savings, or are undertaking significant financial hardship to meet their medical needs,” the lawsuit states.

SC says no one can be fired because of gender

Federal workers, who have filed the case, argued that the ban violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employers from discriminating against someone “because of” gender.

The Supreme Court in 2020 ruled companies cannot fire someone merely because they’re transgender. Last year, the court upheld restrictions on gender-affirming care for minors.

The ban is part of  President Trump’s Day 1 executive order that seeks to suppress “gender ideology.”

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 05: The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on October 05, 2021 in Washington, DC. T
The Trump administration has also looked to restrict interventions for transgender inmates, cut off federal grants, and ban transgender troops from serving in the military. (Getty Images)

The Trump administration has also looked to restrict interventions for transgender inmates, cut off federal grants, and ban transgender troops from serving in the military.

Besides, the Human Rights Campaign, the workers are also represented by the law firms Correia & Puth and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll.

The legal team includes Cathy Harris, whom Trump fired from a board established to protect civil service employees.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called Jared Kushner’s influence 'very bizarre' and urged transparency over his dealings and potential conflicts of interest
47 minutes ago
Abdul El-Sayed questioned why JD Vance would invoke his late grandfather to make an argument about him
1 hour ago
Daniel Driscoll moved up his resignation amid growing tensions with Pete Hegseth and Ricky Buria, who reportedly made his position untenable
1 hour ago
The Vice President fired back after the Michigan Democrat invoked his wife Usha Vance in a political exchange involving Vance's late grandfather
3 hours ago
The latest emergency appeal by the Republicans has the potential to influence the outcome of this year’s midterm elections.
8 hours ago
DHS has asked states to share voter rolls for audits and warned that it could withhold grant money from states that refuse
8 hours ago
CENTCOM developed the plan, which Pete Hegseth backed and sent to the White House several days ago
9 hours ago
Abdul El-Sayed said COVID had killed more Americans than 9/11 and hoped the next decade focused on public health and fighting poverty
10 hours ago
Sean Parnell did not dispute the objections but said they were consistent with the Pentagon’s process for receiving military advice
10 hours ago
'Very unfortunate that PM Carney has turned this into a political shouting match. I mean, we're not at war with Canada', Bessent said
11 hours ago