‘We’ll see you in court’: Federal workers sue Trump admin over gender-affirming care coverage ban

The lawsuit challenges a policy that bars federal workers' health insurance plans from covering medical and surgical care related to gender transition
The arm of the Human Rights Campaign that filed the lawsuit argues that the ban violates the federal prohibition on gender discrimination in the workplace.  (Getty Images)
The arm of the Human Rights Campaign that filed the lawsuit argues that the ban violates the federal prohibition on gender discrimination in the workplace.  (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: A human rights organization has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging its gender-affirming care coverage ban in federal workers’ health insurance plans.

The gender-affirming care coverage ban is a US policy prohibiting federal health insurance programs from covering expenses of medical and surgical procedures associated with gender transition.

Case filed for banning gender transition expenses

The arm of the Human Rights Campaign that filed the lawsuit argues that the ban violates the federal prohibition on gender discrimination in the workplace.  “Our message to the Trump administration is simple: We’ll see you in court,” Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson said in a statement.

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 17: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters after signing a proclamation in the Oval Office at the White House on April 17, 2025 in Washington, DC. The proclamation expands fishing rights in the Pacific Islands to an area he described as three times the size of California. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
US President Donald Trump speaks to reporters after signing a proclamation in the Oval Office at the White House on April 17, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

“Healthcare access should never be weaponized to advance discrimination — and the denial of coverage for critical healthcare based simply on who you are blatantly violates the rights of all of us,” Robinson continued.

At the beginning of this year, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) announced that it was suspending the insurance coverage for chemical and surgical procedures that aim to intervene with gender.

OPM manages health plans for federal workers and acts as a human resource department of the executive branch.

Five federal workers who are seeking such treatment for themselves or family members have brought this lawsuit against the administration.

“They are unable to pay out of pocket for the medically necessary gender-affirming procedures they need, are contemplating draining their savings, or are undertaking significant financial hardship to meet their medical needs,” the lawsuit states.

SC says no one can be fired because of gender

Federal workers, who have filed the case, argued that the ban violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employers from discriminating against someone “because of” gender.

The Supreme Court in 2020 ruled companies cannot fire someone merely because they’re transgender. Last year, the court upheld restrictions on gender-affirming care for minors.

The ban is part of  President Trump’s Day 1 executive order that seeks to suppress “gender ideology.”

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 05: The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on October 05, 2021 in Washington, DC. T
The Trump administration has also looked to restrict interventions for transgender inmates, cut off federal grants, and ban transgender troops from serving in the military. (Getty Images)

The Trump administration has also looked to restrict interventions for transgender inmates, cut off federal grants, and ban transgender troops from serving in the military.

Besides, the Human Rights Campaign, the workers are also represented by the law firms Correia & Puth and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll.

The legal team includes Cathy Harris, whom Trump fired from a board established to protect civil service employees.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Trump blasted Mike Wirth for not crediting his administration and renewed pressure on oil companies to cut gasoline prices
1 hour ago
The memo would permanently bar the federal government from investigating, reviewing or prosecuting Trump or the business empire he runs with his children
3 hours ago
Trump dismissed major pollsters as ‘crooked’ after multiple national surveys independently placed his approval rating in the low 30s
3 hours ago
Lawmakers want stronger powers over Epstein file releases, but political and legal hurdles could decide whether anything changes
4 hours ago
Mullin’s appearance at the National Governors Association summer meeting in Oklahoma City on Saturday, August 1, sparked rage on several levels
4 hours ago
Todd Blanche scrapped Trump's anti-weaponization fund to win GOP support, but the legal agreement behind it still remains unresolved
4 hours ago
House Speaker Mike Johnson praised Kay Granger's public service, saying she broke barriers for women and 'will be greatly missed'
13 hours ago
Acting AG Todd Blanche has issued a formal order rescinding plans to create a $1.8 billion fund as part of the settlement of Trump's IRS lawsuit
14 hours ago
President Donald Trump argued the joint US-Japan currency intervention would strengthen the alliance while delivering financial gains to America
15 hours ago
President Donald Trump proposed cutting Smithsonian funding below $1 billion for the first time since 2020 as part of his museum overhaul
15 hours ago