Trump's DOJ hands the president new shield against future House investigations

A new DOJ opinion extended executive privilege to private advisers, raising questions about future congressional investigations into President Trump
The DOJ issued an opinion stating that executive privilege extended to President Donald Trump's confidential communications with private advisers in certain official matters (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
The DOJ issued an opinion stating that executive privilege extended to President Donald Trump's confidential communications with private advisers in certain official matters (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: The Justice Department has issued a legal opinion stating that executive privilege may extend to President Donald Trump's confidential communications with private advisers under certain circumstances.

The opinion, issued by the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel on Monday, August 10, states that executive privilege may apply when communications relate to official presidential decision-making, involve the president or his direct advisers, and remain confidential.

DOJ defines private advisers

The memorandum broadly defines "private advisers" as individuals the president consults outside the executive branch.

DOJ building (Getty Images)
The Office of Legal Counsel said the opinion applies to confidential presidential communications involving advisers outside the executive branch (Getty Images)

According to the opinion, that category includes members of the public, state officials, and employees of other branches of the federal government.

It also states that executive privilege may apply regardless of whether the adviser is employed by the federal government, provided the communication concerns official presidential decision-making, and satisfies the conditions outlined in the memorandum.

The Office of Legal Counsel said its analysis is based on the president's need to receive confidential advice while carrying out official duties, even when that advice comes from individuals outside the executive branch.

The legal opinion was issued by the Office of Legal Counsel and signed by Assistant Attorney General T Elliot Gaiser.

Report draws political attention

Punchbowl News first reported the memorandum.



Journalist Jake Sherman wrote on X that the opinion could become relevant if Democrats regain control of the House and begin investigating the Trump administration.

The memorandum was published as the administration continues to defend broad claims of executive privilege in matters involving presidential records and communications.

Privilege disputes continue

The memorandum follows years of litigation over the scope of executive privilege during Trump's first administration, when courts considered disputes involving congressional requests for White House records and testimony from current and former administration officials.

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 02: The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on September 02, 2021 in Washington, D
Executive privilege has been the subject of multiple legal disputes involving presidential records and congressional requests in recent years (Getty Images)

Those legal battles helped shape ongoing debates over the limits of presidential confidentiality and congressional oversight.

Trump previously asserted executive privilege during battles over White House records and congressional investigations, including disputes related to the January 6 inquiry.

As of Monday, no congressional leaders had publicly responded to the new Office of Legal Counsel opinion, and the Justice Department announced no additional action beyond issuing the memorandum.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Trump's remarks came a day after he urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to halt attacks on Russian refineries over diesel prices
5 minutes ago
Trump escalated his media fight as CNN, MS NOW and Politico filed a federal lawsuit after their reporters were barred from presidential access
16 minutes ago
Trump has publicly disagreed with the message in Maria Elvira Salazar’s campaign ad, saying she had 'got a little bit soft on the border'
9 hours ago
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the Pentagon’s casualty figures while questioning the newspaper’s reliance on anonymous officials for its report
10 hours ago
The planned talks come after Ukraine launched a large-scale drone attack on Moscow and Russia vowed to intensify strikes on Kyiv
10 hours ago
Tehran recently warned the US and Middle East regions that they will be targeted by 'painful strikes' if they make 'any mistake' against Iran
10 hours ago
The proposed sanctions would go beyond existing US penalties against ICC judges and prosecutors and target the court as an institution
11 hours ago
The Wall Street Journal reported that the footage intensified Donald Trump's frustration with coverage of his second-term record before the White House ban
12 hours ago
Donald Trump escalated his media feud by announcing an “immediate” White House ban on CNN, MS NOW and Politico last week
12 hours ago
John Kennedy made the remarks in Nebraska while campaigning for GOP Sen Pete Ricketts ahead of the November 3 general election
17 hours ago