AOC says House resolution honoring Charlie Kirk pushes 'legacy of bigotry' despite 'horrific' killing

The House passed a resolution by 310-58 votes, but Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said it honored Kirk’s rhetoric that harmed millions
PUBLISHED SEP 20, 2025
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rejected a House resolution that praised Charlie Kirk’s legacy after his death (Getty Images)
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rejected a House resolution that praised Charlie Kirk’s legacy after his death (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Rep Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), voiced strong opposition on Friday to a resolution honoring the “life and legacy” of Charlie Kirk, who was shot and killed at Utah Valley University last week.

The House measure, introduced by Speaker Mike Johnson, passed with bipartisan support in a 310-58 vote. While Republicans largely backed it, Democrats were split, with 95 in favor, 58 against, and 22 not voting.



 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says resolution deepens national divide

Ocasio-Cortez was among the Democrats who voted against the resolution. On the House floor, she said condemning Kirk’s killing was essential, but honoring his “legacy” went too far.

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 20: U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) speaks at a press conference urg
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez spoke at a press conference outside the US Capitol on July 20, 2021 in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

“Charlie Kirk's killing was a horrific and vile attack, an incident of political violence," she said.

"And condemning the depravity of Kirk's brutal murder is a straightforward matter, one that is especially important to help stabilize an increasingly unsafe and volatile political environment where everyday people feel more at risk,” Ocasio-Cortez added.

She further said, “We can disagree with Charlie and come together as a country to denounce the horror of killing. That is a bedrock American value.”

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticizes resolution for honoring Charlie Kirk’s beliefs

Ocasio-Cortez accused House Republicans of using the resolution to “divide” Americans rather than unite them.

She said, “The majority proceeded with a resolution that brings great pain to the millions of Americans who endured segregation, Jim Crow, and the legacy of bigotry today.”

Charlie Kirk speaks at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025 in Orem, Utah. Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was speaking at his
Charlie Kirk addressed students during his 'American Comeback Tour' at Utah Valley University before he was killed (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

She argued that Kirk’s public positions should not be glossed over, saying, “Kirk’s rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant, uneducated and sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans, far from the ‘working tirelessly to promote unity’ asserted by the majority in this resolution.”

The New York congresswoman also extended condolences, stating, “We continue to pray for Mr Kirk's family and loved ones in the wake of this terrible act. I am thinking, especially of his children and his wife, whose grief cannot be measured,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

Internet erupts against Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Ocasio-Cortez’s words drew sharp criticism online, with some users accusing her of being insensitive so soon after Kirk’s death.

“You’re blinded by hatred. You need to work on yourself,” one user wrote on X.



 

Another posted, “I hope the Kirk family sues you for defamation. You are classless, uneducated and immoral. I won’t even call you a human.”



 

“This is disgusting. Beneath the dignity of your office. Haven't even had the funeral yet,” another wrote.



 

“I am pretty sure his killing brought a lot of pain to Americans. She is not reading the room and catering to the worst of her party,” another added.



 

Another comment read, “This is such an easy issue for bipartisan support and they just can’t make themselves be decent people for even this.”



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Poll shows low public support for Trump’s Iran strikes, with many Americans saying he’s too quick to use force and uneasy about troop risks
23 minutes ago
Trump defended the Iran attack by citing a nuclear threat, despite claiming in June 2025 that the country’s nuclear facilities had been obliterated
39 minutes ago
In 2024, US officials uncovered Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps plots, and the DOJ linked them to revenge for Qassem Soleimani’s death
57 minutes ago
Tim Kaine argues Trump’s past policy weakened limits on Iran’s nuclear program and says congressional action is needed on war authority
1 hour ago
Mace defended US strike timing and hit back at Omar’s criticism, saying her comments crossed a line and hinting at stripping citizenship
2 hours ago
While talking to The Atlantic’s Michael Scherer, Donald Trump argued that Tehran could have avoided the strike if it had agreed to a deal earlier
3 hours ago
'As one nation, we grieve for the true American patriots who have made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation,' Donald Trump said
3 hours ago
US and Israeli forces hit Tehran after CIA pinpointed a leadership meeting, leveraging months of tracking to time the strike
4 hours ago
Mark Kelly said he needs more details from the White House and is unlikely to support the administration’s recent actions
4 hours ago
John Fetterman told CNN that he supports Donald Trump's decision to strike Iran and stressed that the action didn't violate the War Powers Resolution
4 hours ago