Appeals court rejects Biden bid to block release of biographer tapes

The case centers on releasing audio recordings and transcripts of Biden's 2016–17 interviews with his memoir ghostwriter
In a 2-1 ruling on Monday, the court rejected former President Joe Biden's bid to block the Justice Department from releasing redacted transcripts and audio of his 2016 interviews with his biographer. (Getty Images)
In a 2-1 ruling on Monday, the court rejected former President Joe Biden's bid to block the Justice Department from releasing redacted transcripts and audio of his 2016 interviews with his biographer. (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: In a major setback to former President Joe Biden in the biographer tapes case, the appeals court on Monday, July 20, rejected Biden's bid to block the release of conversations he had with his biographer roughly a decade ago.

The Biden tape recording case involves a legal battle over the release of audio recordings and transcripts from 2016 and 2017 interviews between Joe Biden and his memoir ghostwriter.

Court denies request to keep DoJ from releasing tape

In a 2-1 verdict on Monday night, the court denied a bid from former President Joe Biden to keep the Justice Department from giving a conservative think tank redacted transcripts and audio recordings of conversations he had with his biographer around 2016-17.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MARCH 23: Former U.S. President Joe Biden poses at the opening night of
 Former U.S. President Joe Biden poses at the opening night of "Othello" on Broadway at The Barrymore Theatre on March 23, 2025 in New York City. (Bruce Glikas/WireImage)

However, the court stayed the written decision until August 3 to allow further appeals.

A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected Biden's attempt to stop the Heritage Foundation from getting the material.

Conservative groups and House Republicans have sought the audio under the Freedom of Information Act to examine Biden's memory and mental acuity.

Court says disclosure would advance public interest at stake

Judges Sri Srinivasan and Gregory Katsas said in an unsigned opinion, "We conclude that Biden has not shown a likelihood that the requested materials must be withheld from disclosure." Judge Florence Pan dissented.

Law Justice Gavel Court (Pexels)
Conservative groups and House Republicans have sought the audio under the Freedom of Information Act to examine Biden's memory and mental acuity. (Law Justice Gavel Court -Pexels)

"We conclude that any remaining incursion on personal privacy from disclosure of the now-redacted materials likely does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure," Srinivasan and Katsas found.

"In that regard, although there is generally a substantial privacy interest in not being identified as the target of an investigation that results in no charges,  ... DOJ announced the Special Counsel's appointment and the purpose of his investigation, and the Special Counsel Report describes at length that Biden was investigated for allegedly retaining and disclosing classified materials."

They wrote that "because the requested materials would bear on understanding and assessing the Special Counsel's investigation and his ultimate decision, disclosure of the materials 'is likely to advance' the public interest at stake."

Biden spokesperson argues conversation is private

In response to the DC Circuit's decision, TJ Ducklo, a spokesperson for Biden, said, "President Biden's conversations for a book a decade ago that discussed his late son are private, and were provided to the Department of Justice on the express condition they stay that way.”

President Joe Biden speaks onstage at the Grand Opening Ceremony for the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center hosted by Pride Live at the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center on June 28, 2024 in New York City. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center, a Program of Pride Live)
President Joe Biden speaks onstage at the Grand Opening Ceremony for the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center hosted by Pride Live at the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center on June 28, 2024 in New York City. (Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center, a Program of Pride Live)

“Reversing course and making them public is just the latest example of this Administration weaponizing the DOJ for political retribution,” Ducklo added.

On July 10, the three-judge panel agreed to issue an administrative injunction stopping the release of the material to the organization for 10 days.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Trump said he was not trying to force Tehran to the bargaining table and did not care whether Iran signed an agreement
8 minutes ago
Fetterman's remarks add to a broader pattern of tension within the Democratic Party
1 hour ago
Earlier, Trump criticized Kathy Hochul’s leadership and endorsed Bruce Blakeman while continuing his attacks on New York’s congestion pricing program
1 hour ago
Vice President JD Vance discussed the end times, demons and AI while rejecting the idea that Trump intended religious offense with his viral image
9 hours ago
Moving past their 2016 bitter feud, Trump and Ted Cruz now maintain a close political alliance and friendly relationship
10 hours ago
Congress cleared a short-term funding bill through December 11, sending it to Trump and removing the immediate shutdown threat
10 hours ago
Trump’s premium Truth Social feed faces a fresh court challenge as Natalie Harp is named among officials targeted over paid access
11 hours ago
Mullin’s tense exchange with a reporter put Trump's expanding deportation crackdown — and who it is targeting — back in the spotlight
11 hours ago
Fresh US strikes follow Iranian attacks on shipping and American troops, while oil prices climb and fears grow over Strait of Hormuz
11 hours ago
An insider claims a key part of the new mail-in ballot portal was never properly documented
12 hours ago