Appeals court rejects Biden bid to block release of biographer tapes

The case centers on releasing audio recordings and transcripts of Biden's 2016–17 interviews with his memoir ghostwriter
In a 2-1 ruling on Monday, the court rejected former President Joe Biden's bid to block the Justice Department from releasing redacted transcripts and audio of his 2016 interviews with his biographer. (Getty Images)
In a 2-1 ruling on Monday, the court rejected former President Joe Biden's bid to block the Justice Department from releasing redacted transcripts and audio of his 2016 interviews with his biographer. (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: In a major setback to former President Joe Biden in the biographer tapes case, the appeals court on Monday, July 20, rejected Biden's bid to block the release of conversations he had with his biographer roughly a decade ago.

The Biden tape recording case involves a legal battle over the release of audio recordings and transcripts from 2016 and 2017 interviews between Joe Biden and his memoir ghostwriter.

Court denies request to keep DoJ from releasing tape

In a 2-1 verdict on Monday night, the court denied a bid from former President Joe Biden to keep the Justice Department from giving a conservative think tank redacted transcripts and audio recordings of conversations he had with his biographer around 2016-17.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MARCH 23: Former U.S. President Joe Biden poses at the opening night of
 Former U.S. President Joe Biden poses at the opening night of "Othello" on Broadway at The Barrymore Theatre on March 23, 2025 in New York City. (Bruce Glikas/WireImage)

However, the court stayed the written decision until August 3 to allow further appeals.

A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected Biden's attempt to stop the Heritage Foundation from getting the material.

Conservative groups and House Republicans have sought the audio under the Freedom of Information Act to examine Biden's memory and mental acuity.

Court says disclosure would advance public interest at stake

Judges Sri Srinivasan and Gregory Katsas said in an unsigned opinion, "We conclude that Biden has not shown a likelihood that the requested materials must be withheld from disclosure." Judge Florence Pan dissented.

Law Justice Gavel Court (Pexels)
Conservative groups and House Republicans have sought the audio under the Freedom of Information Act to examine Biden's memory and mental acuity. (Law Justice Gavel Court -Pexels)

"We conclude that any remaining incursion on personal privacy from disclosure of the now-redacted materials likely does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure," Srinivasan and Katsas found.

"In that regard, although there is generally a substantial privacy interest in not being identified as the target of an investigation that results in no charges,  ... DOJ announced the Special Counsel's appointment and the purpose of his investigation, and the Special Counsel Report describes at length that Biden was investigated for allegedly retaining and disclosing classified materials."

They wrote that "because the requested materials would bear on understanding and assessing the Special Counsel's investigation and his ultimate decision, disclosure of the materials 'is likely to advance' the public interest at stake."

Biden spokesperson argues conversation is private

In response to the DC Circuit's decision, TJ Ducklo, a spokesperson for Biden, said, "President Biden's conversations for a book a decade ago that discussed his late son are private, and were provided to the Department of Justice on the express condition they stay that way.”

President Joe Biden speaks onstage at the Grand Opening Ceremony for the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center hosted by Pride Live at the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center on June 28, 2024 in New York City. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center, a Program of Pride Live)
President Joe Biden speaks onstage at the Grand Opening Ceremony for the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center hosted by Pride Live at the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center on June 28, 2024 in New York City. (Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center, a Program of Pride Live)

“Reversing course and making them public is just the latest example of this Administration weaponizing the DOJ for political retribution,” Ducklo added.

On July 10, the three-judge panel agreed to issue an administrative injunction stopping the release of the material to the organization for 10 days.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Bill Clinton's 2000 Pakistan decoy flight resurfaced after Donald Trump secretly boarded an unmarked military aircraft amid reported Iran threats
55 minutes ago
'As my mother taught me years ago, you stand up to bullies,' Frank Kendall said, emphasizing his determination to fight the decision
57 minutes ago
Ilhan Omar asked the Department of Homeland Security to explain why an ICE agent was outside her town hall, raising surveillance concerns
2 hours ago
Trump signed the order in March, seeking to create a federal voter list and give the Postal Service a direct role in election operations
2 hours ago
Trump addressed why reporters aboard the flight from Turkey to the UK were instructed to keep their window shades down as questions mounted over his secret aircraft switch
3 hours ago
The remarks extend a pattern of Trump seeking greater federal authority over elections
3 hours ago
Darline Graham said she is not being handed Lindsey Graham’s Senate seat and must earn voters’ support ahead of the Republican runoff
4 hours ago
The Trump admin cited limited evidence for pediatric gender-affirming care and projected $235 million in Medicaid and CHIP savings over 10 years
5 hours ago
Abdul El-Sayed's November race against Mike Rogers is expected to be among the nation's most competitive and could decide Senate control
8 hours ago
The ACLU asked a federal court to block Trump's revised birthright citizenship order, arguing it creates new exceptions beyond Supreme Court limits
9 hours ago