DOJ says Epstein file redactions continue as survivor protections drive review

Blanche says document review is ongoing to comply with victim safeguards in disclosure law
PUBLISHED DEC 22, 2025
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche addresses document review standards in a televised interview (Getty Images)
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche addresses document review standards in a televised interview (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said the Justice Department is continuing to redact portions of the Jeffrey Epstein files to protect survivors, pushing back against criticism from lawmakers and commentators who argue the department failed to meet a statutory disclosure deadline.

Speaking on NBC’s Meet the Press, Blanche emphasized that redactions are being made strictly to comply with victim-protection requirements written into the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche appears on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ as Epstein file releases continue (Screengrab/MeetThePress)
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche appears on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ as Epstein file releases continue (Screengrab/MeetThePress)

DOJ defends partial release amid deadline criticism

The Epstein Files Transparency Act directed the Justice Department to make all unclassified Epstein-related records public within 30 days, with limited exceptions. On Friday, DOJ released an initial tranche of thousands of documents, prompting backlash from both Democrats and Republicans who said the disclosure fell short of the law’s requirements.

Blanche rejected that characterization, saying the statute explicitly requires the department to safeguard survivors’ identities and sensitive information.



“The reason why we are still reviewing documents and still continuing our process is simply that - to protect victims,” Blanche told Meet the Press. “We’re going through a very methodical process with hundreds of lawyers looking at every single document.”

He said DOJ has identified more than 1,200 names of survivors and family members during the review process, including some uncovered only days before the initial release, complicating the timeline.

No political redactions, Todd Blanche says

Blanche also denied claims that names of public figures are being withheld for political reasons, including President Donald Trump.

“There’s no effort to hold anything back because there’s the name Donald J. Trump or anybody else’s name,” Blanche told NBC News. “We’re not redacting the names of famous men and women associated with Epstein.”

DOJ said some images were temporarily removed after concerns raised by survivor advocacy groups (x/@GavrielEToviel)
DOJ said some images were temporarily removed after concerns raised by survivor advocacy groups (x/@GavrielEToviel)

He added that any redaction unrelated to survivor protection would be limited to legally recognized privileges, such as attorney-client material.

Blanche said confidence in DOJ’s handling of the files should be based on what is ultimately released, noting that the review process involves career lawyers from the department’s National Security Division rather than political appointees.

Photos temporarily removed after survivor concerns

Controversy escalated over the weekend after DOJ removed more than a dozen photographs from its Epstein document portal, including one image showing a desk drawer containing photos of President Trump.

Blanche said the removal had 'nothing to do with President Trump' and was prompted by concerns raised by survivor advocacy groups regarding images of women appearing in the photos.

WASHINGTON - JUNE 5: The U.S. Capitol is shown June 5, 2003 in Washington, DC. Both houses of the U.S. Congress, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives meet in the Capitol. (Photo by Stefan Zaklin/Getty Images)
Todd Blanche said federal law requires safeguarding survivor information during disclosures (Stefan Zaklin/Getty Images)

“We don’t have perfect information,” Blanche told NBC News. “When we hear from victims-rights groups about this type of photograph, we pull it down and investigate.”

He said the images would be reposted after DOJ determines whether further redactions are necessary, including obscuring faces or other identifying details.

Lawmakers press DOJ over transparency

Several lawmakers have accused DOJ of violating the law by failing to release all documents by the statutory deadline. Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the department had failed to comply and pledged oversight action.

Rep. Ro Khanna, who co-sponsored the transparency legislation, called the initial release 'disappointing' and urged DOJ leadership to publicly outline a clear timeline for completion.



Republicans including Rep. Thomas Massie and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene also criticized the staggered release, questioning whether information was being withheld.

Blanche dismissed those accusations, saying criticism has come from 'the same individuals who apparently don’t want us to protect victims.'

DOJ says process will continue in coming weeks

Blanche said the department expects to release additional batches of documents in the coming weeks as the review continues, stressing that compliance with victim-protection laws takes precedence over speed.

“We will continue to comply with the statute,” Blanche said. “If by complying with the law we don’t produce everything on one day, but do so next week or the week after, that’s still compliance.”

The Justice Department has said the Epstein files being released represent an unprecedented level of transparency for a closed federal investigation, with redactions limited to survivor information and legally protected material.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

The 22-foot statue, nicknamed 'Don Colossus,' was funded by a group of cryptocurrency enthusiasts seeking to promote their memecoin, $PATRIOT
2 hours ago
The President’s daughter-in-law aimed the rock legend after he dropped a new track protesting federal immigration enforcement, branding the 76-year-old icon as an 'idiot'
2 hours ago
Gavin Newsom says he drifted into marriage with Kimberly Guilfoyle without clarity, adding she accepted the emotional distance he maintained
2 hours ago
Backlash grew after Bad Bunny’s Grammys ICE remarks, in which he said immigrants ‘are not savage, we’re not animals, we’re not aliens'
2 hours ago
Renee Good’s brother described the federal response as disappointing, noting that the family had hoped her death would spark meaningful change
2 hours ago
Jasmine Crockett explained that she could no longer support Minaj’s music because she viewed her political choices as a betrayal of core values
3 hours ago
Nancy Mace told Todd Starnes she never sent staffers for alcohol or cleaning, citing an early bedtime and denying any late-night activity
3 hours ago
An anonymous NFC offensive player criticized the NFL’s Bad Bunny choice, saying halftime shows should feature American artists
4 hours ago
The trail appeared on the front steps, alongside remnants of a Ring camera that had been removed from the front door area
4 hours ago
Ava's public criticism of ICE and the administration stood out sharply within WWE's broader political landscape
4 hours ago