Fact Check: Did Pam Bondi win a legal battle against transgender swimmer Lia Thomas?

A rumor claimed Pam Bondi had won her legal battle against Lia Thomas, barring her from the Olympics and delivering sports' harshest penalty
Despite widespread rumors, no court case between Pam Bondi and Lia Thomas ever took place (Getty Images)
Despite widespread rumors, no court case between Pam Bondi and Lia Thomas ever took place (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: A rumor has been going around that US Attorney General Pam Bondi won a legal battle against Lia Thomas, the transgender swimmer who made headlines in 2022 for becoming the first openly trans athlete to win an NCAA Division I championship.

It all started on June 12 when one Facebook page posted, "OH MY GOD! Pam Bondi has won her legal battle against Lia Thomas and will not have a chance to qualify for the Olympics, marking a huge victory for women's sport and facing the heaviest penalty in sports history for cheating."



 

The post, which racked up more than 44,000 reactions, shared a link to a sketchy WordPress blog filled with ads.

The article declared, “In a surprising turn of events, Pam Bondi has achieved a significant legal victory in her fight against Lia Thomas, the transgender swimmer who has been the subject of controversy in the sports world. The court's decision not only means that Thomas will not have the opportunity to qualify for the Olympics, but also marks a milestone in the history of women's sport, sparking intense debate about equity, inclusion, and the rules governing sports competitions.”

The blog painted the alleged Bondi-vs-Thomas courtroom showdown as a bigger battle over fairness in sports.

U.S. President Donald Trump (R) walks with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi (L) during a visit to the Justice Department March 14, 2025 in Washington, DC. As he has used the department to punish enemies, Trump is expected to deliver what the White House calls a law-and-order speech and outline steps he will take to counter “weaponization” of the department. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
US President Donald Trump walks with US Attorney General Pam Bondi during a visit to the Justice Department on March 14, 2025, in Washington, DC (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

“The battle between Bondi and Thomas has been emblematic of the growing tension surrounding the participation of transgender athletes in women's sports. While many advocate for inclusion and the right of all athletes to compete in their appropriate category, others, like Bondi, argue that this may put cisgender women at a disadvantage. The court's recent decision, which has been greeted with jubilation by some and outrage by others, raises fundamental questions about equity in sports," it said.

It didn't take long for the rumor to spread on other social platforms like Threads, X (formerly Twitter), and even more Facebook posts.

Fact Check: False

Despite the claims, no credible news outlets reported anything about a legal fight between Pam Bondi and Lia Thomas.

Searches across Bing, DuckDuckGo, Google, and Yahoo all came up empty. Not even political blogs had anything to say.

In truth, there was no court case, Snopes confirmed.

CAMBRIDGE, MA - FEBRUARY 19: University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas reacts after her team win
Lia Thomas reacts after her team wins the 400-yard freestyle relay during the 2022 Ivy League Women's Swimming and Diving Championships at Blodgett Pool on February 19, 2022, in Cambridge, Massachusetts (Kathryn Riley/Getty Images)

While the Bondi-Thomas rumor was fake, there have been some real developments in Washington with regards to transgender athletes.

Back in February, President Donald Trump signed a controversial executive order called "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports." ESPN reported that it officially bans transgender athletes from participating in girls’ and women’s sports.

“With this executive order, the war on women’s sports is over,” Trump declared during the signing ceremony.

The order gives sweeping powers to federal agencies—including the Justice and Education departments—to make sure schools and organizations receiving federal funding follow the administration’s definition of sex, meaning the gender someone was assigned at birth.

More on Donald Trump's executive order

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said “[the order] upholds the promise of Title IX” and promised it would prompt “immediate action, including enforcement actions, against schools and athletic associations” that don’t comply with single-sex sports and locker room policies.

The timing of the executive order seemed deliberate, as it came on National Girls and Women in Sports Day—aligning with Trump’s broader efforts to placate voters who feel that transgender rights in sports have gone too far.

U.S. President Donald Trump joined by women athletes signs the “No Men in Women’s Sports” executive order in the East Room at the White House on February 5, 2025 in Washington, DC. The executive order, which Trump signed on National Girls and Women in Sports Day, prohibits transgender women from competing in women’s sports and is the third order he has signed that targets transgender people. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
US President Donald Trump, joined by women athletes, signs the “No Men in Women’s Sports” executive order in the East Room at the White House on February 5, 2025, in Washington, DC (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

According to AP VoteCast, more than half of voters believed that support for transgender rights had crossed a line. Trump repeatedly vowed to end what he called the “transgender insanity,” albeit he didn’t get into many specifics during the campaign.

But the executive order did offer some clarity. The Education Department can now penalize schools that allow transgender athletes to compete, claiming they’re out of compliance with Title IX. Schools that violate the order could even lose federal funding.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Members of both parties in the House, including returning and newly elected lawmakers, meet privately to choose their leaders through secret ballot voting
2026-11-10T20:48:49.000Z
A three-judge panel of a federal appeals court ruled against the Trump administration’s plan to investigate the government’s confidential data leak cases, suggesting access to journalists’ LinkedIn records could impart a 'damaging blow' to First Amendment rights
2026-11-10T20:03:35.000Z
As the House prepares to consider a vote on Hegseth’s impeachment resolution, administration officials and Republican allies, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, Attorney General Todd Blanche and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have defended the Pentagon chief’s military actions in Iran
2026-11-10T18:54:10.000Z
Senator Rick Scott, who signed a letter calling for Tuesday’s leadership vote to be postponed, said Republicans should first decide what they want to achieve before choosing their leader
2026-11-10T17:09:57.000Z
Thomas Massie introduced a privileged resolution under House rules, requiring the House to take it up within two legislative days if it is recognized as privileged
2026-11-10T15:38:44.000Z
General Counsel Tim Teter's outreach to federal investigators triggered internal concerns before the Justice Department took over the Megaspeed case
2026-11-10T07:07:01.000Z
Reporter Reese Gorman reported that Haley Stevens stayed in the Republican cloakroom during House votes while reporters found her office locked
2026-11-10T06:20:25.000Z
The former Trump aide pushed back against a New York Post report citing advisers who claimed she was trying to impress the president
2026-11-10T05:26:59.000Z
Jensen Huang opposed China chip curbs in a 2025 meeting with Donald Trump, after which Nvidia pledged $500 billion to US manufacturing and donated $20 million to Trump's ballroom fund
2026-11-10T04:40:28.000Z
Marjorie Taylor Greene blamed Donald Trump's team for misleading him about Republican losses and argued that millions of GOP voters stayed home
2026-11-10T03:49:15.000Z