Fact check: Would SAVE Act requiring birth certificate to vote prevent married women from voting?

Trump urged Republican lawmakers in January to pass the legislation known as the SAVE Act
PUBLISHED JAN 27, 2026
President Donald Trump gives a speech at the World Economic Forum (WEF) on January 21, 2026, in Davos, Switzerland (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump gives a speech at the World Economic Forum (WEF) on January 21, 2026, in Davos, Switzerland (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: In early January, President Donald Trump urged Republican lawmakers to pass the legislation known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, a bill that would require proof of citizenship to register to vote.

Following this, a rumor circulated across social media claiming that the SAVE Act would make the majority of married women, who took their husband's last name, ineligible to vote. But is there any truth to this? Let us find out below.

Claim: The SAVE Act would prevent married women from voting

In January 2026, several social media users claimed that the SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, would prevent the majority of married women from voting.

An X user wrote, "The SAVE Act is a direct attack on the 19th Amendment! By requiring certified birth certificates, it disenfranchises MILLIONS of married women who've changed their names. It’s a blatant attempt to roll back progress & silence women's voices! #StopTheSaveAct." 

(@bannerite/X)
(@bannerite/X)

Similarly, another post on X read, "ALARM: Trump is pushing Republicans to ram the SAVE ACT through, a Project 2025 voter-ID bill that requires voters’ current names to MATCH their birth certificates. About 79% of married women take their spouse’s name. This could disenfranchise MILLIONS." 

(@CalltoActivism/X)
(@CalltoActivism/X)

Meanwhile, a post on Facebook mentioned, "Republicans are now pushing the SAVE Act, which would require voter ID to match your BIRTH CERTIFICATE, making about 79% of women (who took their husband's last name) INELLIGIBLE TO VOTE." 

(Care2/Facebook)
(Care2/Facebook)

"Don't let them erase YOUR RIGHT to self-determination. What's next...no ability to have your own bank account or credit card, it's only been 50 years...," the post added.

Interestingly, since 2024, social media users have spread claims about the SAVE Act and its possible effects on women's voting rights. 

Fact Check: False, The Act would not prevent married women from voting

Rep Chip Roy, who introduced the bill in January 2025, in an emailed statement to Snopes last year, dismissed allegations about the SAVE Act disenfranchising women and other voters as "absurd armchair speculation being spun up by media outlets who care more about clicks than reality."

The GOP Rep pointed to language in the legislation directing states to "establish a process for individuals to register to vote if there are discrepancies in their proof of citizenship documents due to something like a name change." 

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 19: Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) speaks after a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on September 19, 2023 in Washington, DC. A deal between factions of House Republicans to pass a stopgap spending bill and avoid a government shutdown will be tested Tuesday with a procedural vote. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Rep Chip Roy (R-TX) speaks after a House Republican caucus meeting at the US Capitol on September 19, 2023, in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

The bill requires documentary proof of American citizenship to register to vote, which is, for many Americans, a birth certificate. However, if an applicant uses a birth certificate to prove citizenship, they must present it alongside a government-issued photo ID.

The SAVE Act was passed by the House in 2024 and in 2025. However, it is not a law at the time of filing this story. The POTUS can sign the SAVE Act into law only if both chambers of Congress pass it. 

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

The US Supreme Court appeared skeptical of Trump’s effort to limit birthright citizenship
46 minutes ago
The video appears to show people with US flags and banners chaotically pushing security personnels
1 hour ago
Mojtaba Khamenei has extended his gratitude to the Iranians and their religious leadership
2 hours ago
The Chicago Bulls have waived guard Jaden Ivey following a series of controversial Instagram Live comments
20 hours ago
Searches of reliable news reports show no evidence that John Fetterman ever said Oprah Winfrey offered him $20 million to buy his vote
23 hours ago
A circulating report claims that Kim Kardashian wants to date a lawyer or scientist who earns $1 million per week
1 day ago
The claim that Chelsea Clinton is sick went viral on social media, but it is false
1 day ago
ATF bullet analysis in Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk case is inconclusive
1 day ago
Trump was gifted a luxury Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet straight from the royal family of Qatar
1 day ago
The rumor originated from an Instagram post that claimed that the alleged incident happened between 1989 and 1990
1 day ago