House votes 231-195 to overturn Trump executive order on federal bargaining rights

Twenty Republicans joined Democrats in passing the bill, which aims to reinstate collective bargaining rights for nearly a million federal employees
PUBLISHED DEC 13, 2025
The rare bipartisan measure marks the first time the House has voted to nullify an executive order from President Donald Trump this term (Getty Images)
The rare bipartisan measure marks the first time the House has voted to nullify an executive order from President Donald Trump this term (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: The Republican-led House of Representatives delivered a significant rebuke to President Donald Trump on Thursday, December 11, voting 231-195 to overturn his executive order regarding federal worker bargaining rights.

The rare bipartisan measure marks the first time the House has voted to nullify an executive order from the president this term, signaling a fracture in GOP unity regarding labor protections.

Twenty Republicans crossed the aisle to join Democrats in passing the bill, which aims to reinstate collective bargaining rights for nearly one million federal employees.

Jared Golden hails vote as 'solidarity in action'

The legislation was introduced by Representatives Jared Golden (D-Maine) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pennsylvania), highlighting the cross-party effort to protect civil servants.

"This is solidarity in action. I’m proud of the bipartisan coalition who passed this bill," Golden wrote on X (formerly Twitter) following the vote.

Fitzpatrick echoed the sentiment, stating that the measure "restores something fundamental: the right of public servants to be heard, respected, and represented in their workplace."

(Getty Images)
 Rep Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican co-sponsor, urged the Senate to 'finish the job' and restore worker rights (Getty Images)

He urged the Senate to "finish the job," though it remains unclear if Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) will bring the bill to a floor vote.

White House cited 'national security' for crackdown

The controversy stems from an executive order Trump signed earlier this year, which terminated collective bargaining with federal agencies tied to national security.

Citing authority under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, the administration argued that certain unions had "declared war" on the POTUS' agenda.

U.S. President Donald Trump, accompanied by Tulsi Gabbard and her husband Abraham Williams, signs Gabbard's commission for her new role as director of national inteligence after she was sworn in, in the Oval Office at the White House on February 12, 2025 in Washington, DC. Gabbard, who will oversee the 18 intelligence agencies and serve as Trump’s advisory on intelligence, was confirmed by the Senate 52-48. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump's order cited national security concerns to strip bargaining rights from employees at the Departments of State, Defense, Veterans Affairs, and other agencies (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

The White House defended the posture in March, stating that Trump "refuses to let union obstruction interfere with his efforts to protect Americans and our national interests."

The order affected a wide swath of the government, including the Departments of State, Defense, Veterans Affairs, Energy, Treasury, Justice, and Homeland Security.

In August, Trump expanded these restrictions to include the National Weather Service, NASA, and the US Agency for Global Media.

Unions praise House's move

Labor leaders celebrated the House vote as a major victory against what they termed an assault on workers' rights.

Liz Shuler, president of the AFL-CIO, commended the lawmakers who "stood with workers and voted to reverse the single largest act of union-busting in American history."

(x/@LizShuler)
AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler praised the bipartisan vote as a victory against the 'union-busting boss in the White House' (@LizShuler/X)

"As we turn to the Senate - where the bill already has bipartisan support - working people are calling on the politicians we elected to stand with us, even if it means standing up to the union-busting boss in the White House," Shuler said in a statement.

The bill now heads to the upper chamber, where its fate rests with Republican leadership.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Donald Trump highlighted what he described as major setbacks for Iran, claiming its navy has been 'completely wiped out'
2 hours ago
Speaking Monday at the Capitol with MeidasTouch reporter Pablo Manríquez, Ocasio-Cortez reacted to Trump’s golfing amid tensions tied to the Iran conflict
2 hours ago
President lashes out at bipartisan calls, says he 'will not be rushed' in Congress clash
11 hours ago
'Why does the pope think it is fine for Iran to have a nuclear weapon and to kill 42,000 unarmed protesters?' Trump asked Pope Leo XIV
11 hours ago
Patel files defamation suit over 'drunken' claims; experts warn 'discovery trap' may expose private videos
13 hours ago
Kash Patel's lawyers accused The Atlantic and writer Sarah Fitzpatrick of publishing a 'sweeping, malicious and defamatory hit piece' against him
13 hours ago
President breaks silence, slams 'rigged' polls, 'fake news,' vows new Iranian leadership
14 hours ago
President Trump emphasized that preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear capability remains the central and non-negotiable objective of US efforts
14 hours ago
Journalists cite lawsuits and regulatory pressure in call for resistance at high-profile event
14 hours ago
Catholic parishes say participation forces compliance with policies they argue contradict doctrine, raising concerns about access to public programs
15 hours ago