'He wasn't found guilty': Internet rallies behind Donald Trump after Illinois judge removes him from state ballot citing 'insurrectionist ban'

A similar ruling from Colorado against Donald Trump is pending before the US Supreme Court
PUBLISHED FEB 29, 2024
Donald Trump was removed from Illinois primary ballot (Getty Images)
Donald Trump was removed from Illinois primary ballot (Getty Images)

SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS: Donald Trump was removed from the Illinois primary ballot by a Cook County judge on Wednesday, February 28. However, the judge's ruling was delayed until Friday to allow for an appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court.

Judge Tracie Porter ruled that the Illinois State Board of Elections erred in its decision to reject a petition signed by five Illinois voters who disapproved of Trump's candidacy.

The objectors argued that Trump was ineligible under the 14th Amendment because of his conduct related to the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, which they described as a "insurrection."

Judge Tracie Porter removes Donald Trump from Illinois state ballot

Caryn Lederer, lead attorney for the objectors, said in a statement on Wednesday, "Judge Porter’s reasoned decision contributes to the growing consensus of courts recognizing and condemning Trump’s decisive role in the January 6 attack on the Capitol. The decision recognizes the importance of the rule of law and upholding the mandate of the US Constitution."

In a statement, Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said that the ruling was "unconstitutional" and that the campaign will fight it.

(Getty Images)
Donald Trump faces another roadblock in his campaign after getting booted from Illinois primary ballot (Getty Images)

Cheung said, "Today, an activist Democrat judge in Illinois summarily overruled the state's board of elections and contradicted earlier decisions from dozens of other state and federal jurisdictions."

The ruling is made concurrently with the US Supreme Court considering a comparable challenge to Trump's Colorado candidacies. On February 8, the top court heard oral arguments in that case; a ruling has not yet been made.

(Getty Images)
Donald Trump was earlier bumped from Colorado primary ballot (Getty Images)

An administrative hearing officer in Illinois initially heard the objection and suggested that the matter be dropped. Retired Republican judge Clark Erickson stated that although Trump's conduct during the attack on the Capitol on January 6 probably amounted to an insurrection, the Board of Elections had no jurisdiction over such matters.

The Board of Elections concurred and decided to reject the objection on January 30 by a unanimous vote. The board further stated that the objectors had not demonstrated that Trump had intentionally misled in his Illinois declaration of candidacy when he claimed to be legally eligible to be president.

Porter overturned that ruling in her order on Wednesday, pointing out that Trump submitted his declaration of candidacy on January 4, 2024, almost a week after the Colorado Supreme Court declared that Trump had participated in an uprising and was, thus, unable to run for office in Colorado.

Internet sides with Donald Trump after Illinois judge removes him from state ballot

Many internet users came out in support of Trumo after an Illinois judge removed the former President from the state ballot. A user on X wrote, "When was Trump ever convicted or found guilty of insurrection?" 



 

One user added, "Should someone tell Illinois that Trump has not been charged and/or convicted of any insurrections?"



 

Another user commented, "This will not go as planned. There is a massive party switch affiliation (D to R) in Illinois. Minorities are tired of illegal felons"



 

while one added, "States can’t modify federal elections. None of these attempts will work, and if they do, they’re manipulating this election incredibly. Don’t these jusdges even consider the consequences of what their decision would entail. Politics aside, if this decision is affirmed, any state could make a claim of a candidate and remove them from the ballot in the future. All for 'saving democracy too'"



 

A person also wrote, "I would be looking at moving out of any state that even tries to do this. They will be the first to fall…"



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

It will give the Trump administration tools to push back on the most 'onerous' state rules, White House AI adviser David Sacks said
10 minutes ago
Kristi Noem said no US citizens or military veterans have been deported under the Trump administration
23 hours ago
Republicans Murkowski, Collins, Sullivan, and Hawley broke ranks to back an ACA subsidy extension by Dems, but the bill still fell short of advancing
1 day ago
Dems lost bid to extend Obamacare tax credits before January deadline as the measure fell short of 60 votes, despite 4 GOP senators siding with them
1 day ago
ESTA applicants may face expanded data collection, with travelers required to provide phone numbers from the past decade as well as family details
2 days ago
Texas Rep Keith Self warned that broken promises on digital currency and abortion language could jeopardize final passage of the NDAA
2 days ago
Stevens cited halted cancer trials and rising measles cases, but the move was expected to remain symbolic as the House was unlikely to advance it
2 days ago
Judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao said that the policy reflected military judgment and constitutional precedent
3 days ago
The measures will restrict ICE actions at schools, hospitals, and courthouses, while expanding privacy safeguards and legal avenues for migrants
3 days ago
Jeff Merkley and Catherine Cortez Masto introduced the 'Change Corruption Act', which sought to ban living presidents from appearing on US currency
3 days ago