'It'll all go to hell': Trump defends his $5,000 pledge with a swipe at Democrats

Trump pledged $5,000 to US citizens at the RNC convention in Dallas as questions remained over congressional approval
President Donald Trump walks toward reporters before answering questions prior to boarding Air Force One on April 10, 2026, at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump walks toward reporters before answering questions prior to boarding Air Force One on April 10, 2026, at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

DUBLIN, IRELAND: President Donald Trump defended his $5,000 pledge to US adults on Sunday, September 13, saying Republicans could “easily handle” the payments while attacking Democrats’ ability to deliver.

Trump said the proposed dividends would be funded because his administration is taking in “so much money,” despite questions over congressional approval.

The president made the remarks while speaking with reporters during his two-day visit to Ireland, where he was attending the Irish Open.



Trump says Republicans can handle the proposed payments

Asked whether Congress would need to approve the $5,000 payments, Trump said Republicans could make the plan work if they retain control of both chambers in the midterm elections.

“But it's easy enough that the Republicans win, as you said,” Trump said. “It's $5,000 to all adults in the country, and we can easily handle that because we're taking in so much money.”

He then contrasted the proposal with Democrats, saying, “The Democrats can't make that pledge because it'll all go to hell right away.”

Trump announced the so-called “Trump dividends” during the first night of the Republican National Committee’s midterm convention in Dallas, as per a report by The Hill.

Helicopter Marine One carrying President Donald Trump, approaches landing at the Trump International Golf Links course in Doonbeg, Ireland, Saturday, Sept 12, 2026 (AP Photo/Peter Morrison)
Helicopter Marine One carrying President Donald Trump approaches landing at the Trump International Golf Links course in Doonbeg, Ireland, Saturday, September 12, 2026 (AP Photo/Peter Morrison)

He also said that the payments would reflect his administration’s “tremendous economic success.”

He compared the payments to a company distributing cash to shareholders and said the money “must be spent” inside the country.

Legal experts question whether Trump can spend the money

The proposed payments face a question over whether Trump can authorize the spending without Congress. 

Paul Berman, a George Washington University Law School professor, said, “It’s not something that the president can unilaterally do,” as per the outlet.



Congress has appropriating power, meaning the executive branch cannot spend public money unless lawmakers have specifically set aside funds, the report said. 

Sen Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, has said he would introduce legislation to make the dividends a reality, but Trump has said he does not think it is needed.

“The country is doing so well. We’ve taken in trillions of dollars in tariffs and other things,” Trump told CBS News when asked about congressional approval.

Tariffs have generated roughly $341 billion in net revenue since the start of 2025, according to Treasury Department data cited by the Bipartisan Policy Center. 

WASHINGTON - JUNE 5: The U.S. Capitol is shown June 5, 2003 in Washington, DC. Both houses of the U.S. Congress, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives meet in the Capitol. (Photo by Stefan Zaklin/Getty Images)
The Capitol is shown on June 5, 2003, in Washington, DC (Stefan Zaklin/Getty Images)

The Trump administration has also been ordered to refund roughly $166 billion after the Supreme Court struck down its sweeping global tariffs in February.

Berman said the tariff revenue would not solve the congressional spending issue. “First of all, there isn’t enough tariff revenue to cover this,” he said. “Even if there were, that’s money that goes back to the public fisc, and then Congress is the one that has the power of the purse to allocate it.”

Trump's $5,000 plan faces questions over election rules

The condition that Republicans retain control of Congress has prompted criticism over whether the proposed payments could amount to an unlawful quid pro quo, as per the Hill report. 

Federal law makes it illegal to offer or receive money or anything of value in exchange for voting or withholding a vote, it said.

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 22: U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) speaks alongside fellow Freedom Caucus members during a press conference on the government funding bill at the U.S. Capitol on March 22, 2024 in Washington, DC. The Freedom Caucus chastised House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) for working with Democrats and urged their Republican colleagues not to support the funding bill while calling for a government spending reduction, increased border security and scaling back of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Rep Ralph Norman (R-SC) speaks alongside fellow Freedom Caucus members during a press conference at the Capitol on March 22, 2024, in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Rep Jim McGovern, D-Mass, called the proposal an attempt to “bribe people for votes,” while Rep Ralph Norman, R-SC, cited “serious concerns” about how it would be paid for. 

Former Rep Bob Good, R-Va, called it a “socialist-vote buying scheme.”

The Supreme Court held in a 1982 case that broad campaign promises to confer benefits on voters as taxpayers, citizens or members of the general public are constitutionally protected speech.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Rep Randy Fine said that the government should review the citizenship records of everyone who became a naturalized US citizen since 1990
2026-10-28T08:02:30.000Z
Lisa Murkowski endorsed Democrat Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins over Donald Trump-backed Bernadette Wilson, calling him a fresh, commonsense leader for Alaska
2026-10-28T06:36:10.000Z
A report shifted Ohio’s governor race toward Amy Acton, citing Vivek Ramaswamy’s campaign strategy, rising concerns over his ad and Acton’s five-point poll lead
2026-10-28T06:24:27.000Z
The filing sought to add an obstruction charge but had not undergone judicial review to determine whether probable cause existed
2026-10-28T05:53:45.000Z
Trump made the remarks at a rally one week before the midterm elections, where he has been campaigning for Republican candidates
2026-10-28T04:53:00.000Z
Kamala Harris called impeaching Donald Trump 'not a good idea,' urging Democrats to prioritize investigations and accountability instead
2026-10-28T03:53:46.000Z
The investigation focused on Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony before the House committee investigating the January 6 attack in 2022
2026-10-28T03:32:05.000Z
Trump announced a proposed rollback of Biden-era methane regulations, claiming it would save $45 billion and boost Texas energy production as Republicans fight to retain the Senate seat
2026-10-28T02:56:04.000Z
Mike Waltz accused Cuba’s leadership of profiting from forced labour and confiscated assets, telling Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla to 'back up!' during the heated exchange
2026-10-28T02:01:58.000Z
The president ran three different polls asking users to choose a new name for AI: “Super Intelligence,” “Extreme Intelligence” and “Supreme Intelligence”
2026-10-27T20:05:39.000Z