'It'll all go to hell': Trump defends his $5,000 pledge with a swipe at Democrats

Trump pledged $5,000 to US citizens at the RNC convention in Dallas as questions remained over congressional approval
President Donald Trump walks toward reporters before answering questions prior to boarding Air Force One on April 10, 2026, at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump walks toward reporters before answering questions prior to boarding Air Force One on April 10, 2026, at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

DUBLIN, IRELAND: President Donald Trump defended his $5,000 pledge to US adults on Sunday, September 13, saying Republicans could “easily handle” the payments while attacking Democrats’ ability to deliver.

Trump said the proposed dividends would be funded because his administration is taking in “so much money,” despite questions over congressional approval.

The president made the remarks while speaking with reporters during his two-day visit to Ireland, where he was attending the Irish Open.



Trump says Republicans can handle the proposed payments

Asked whether Congress would need to approve the $5,000 payments, Trump said Republicans could make the plan work if they retain control of both chambers in the midterm elections.

“But it's easy enough that the Republicans win, as you said,” Trump said. “It's $5,000 to all adults in the country, and we can easily handle that because we're taking in so much money.”

He then contrasted the proposal with Democrats, saying, “The Democrats can't make that pledge because it'll all go to hell right away.”

Trump announced the so-called “Trump dividends” during the first night of the Republican National Committee’s midterm convention in Dallas, as per a report by The Hill.

Helicopter Marine One carrying President Donald Trump, approaches landing at the Trump International Golf Links course in Doonbeg, Ireland, Saturday, Sept 12, 2026 (AP Photo/Peter Morrison)
Helicopter Marine One carrying President Donald Trump approaches landing at the Trump International Golf Links course in Doonbeg, Ireland, Saturday, September 12, 2026 (AP Photo/Peter Morrison)

He also said that the payments would reflect his administration’s “tremendous economic success.”

He compared the payments to a company distributing cash to shareholders and said the money “must be spent” inside the country.

Legal experts question whether Trump can spend the money

The proposed payments face a question over whether Trump can authorize the spending without Congress. 

Paul Berman, a George Washington University Law School professor, said, “It’s not something that the president can unilaterally do,” as per the outlet.



Congress has appropriating power, meaning the executive branch cannot spend public money unless lawmakers have specifically set aside funds, the report said. 

Sen Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, has said he would introduce legislation to make the dividends a reality, but Trump has said he does not think it is needed.

“The country is doing so well. We’ve taken in trillions of dollars in tariffs and other things,” Trump told CBS News when asked about congressional approval.

Tariffs have generated roughly $341 billion in net revenue since the start of 2025, according to Treasury Department data cited by the Bipartisan Policy Center. 

WASHINGTON - JUNE 5: The U.S. Capitol is shown June 5, 2003 in Washington, DC. Both houses of the U.S. Congress, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives meet in the Capitol. (Photo by Stefan Zaklin/Getty Images)
The Capitol is shown on June 5, 2003, in Washington, DC (Stefan Zaklin/Getty Images)

The Trump administration has also been ordered to refund roughly $166 billion after the Supreme Court struck down its sweeping global tariffs in February.

Berman said the tariff revenue would not solve the congressional spending issue. “First of all, there isn’t enough tariff revenue to cover this,” he said. “Even if there were, that’s money that goes back to the public fisc, and then Congress is the one that has the power of the purse to allocate it.”

Trump's $5,000 plan faces questions over election rules

The condition that Republicans retain control of Congress has prompted criticism over whether the proposed payments could amount to an unlawful quid pro quo, as per the Hill report. 

Federal law makes it illegal to offer or receive money or anything of value in exchange for voting or withholding a vote, it said.

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 22: U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) speaks alongside fellow Freedom Caucus members during a press conference on the government funding bill at the U.S. Capitol on March 22, 2024 in Washington, DC. The Freedom Caucus chastised House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) for working with Democrats and urged their Republican colleagues not to support the funding bill while calling for a government spending reduction, increased border security and scaling back of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Rep Ralph Norman (R-SC) speaks alongside fellow Freedom Caucus members during a press conference at the Capitol on March 22, 2024, in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Rep Jim McGovern, D-Mass, called the proposal an attempt to “bribe people for votes,” while Rep Ralph Norman, R-SC, cited “serious concerns” about how it would be paid for. 

Former Rep Bob Good, R-Va, called it a “socialist-vote buying scheme.”

The Supreme Court held in a 1982 case that broad campaign promises to confer benefits on voters as taxpayers, citizens or members of the general public are constitutionally protected speech.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

'We've got to combat the unprecedented corruption that's been unleashed on the American people, and beginning on day one', Hakeem Jeffries said
9 minutes ago
Abdul El-Sayed rejected Mike Johnson's claim that socialists like him and Zohran Mamdani were barbarians let 'inside the gate'
27 minutes ago
Trump said Iran was calling for a deal but also raised the possibility of staying and keeping its oil, drawing a comparison to Venezuela
1 hour ago
Texas Republican Ted Cruz appeared on ESPN’s 'College GameDay' to discuss the Protect College Sports Act
2 hours ago
Trump responded after UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham said a border poll would require clear public support
2 hours ago
The viral debate moment added another unusual chapter to Alaska's Senate race, where two candidates named Dan Sullivan are on the ballot
2 hours ago
Trump also claimed NBC wanted to give him a five-year extension and 'would have paid me anything' to stay with 'The Apprentice'
11 hours ago
Despite dismissing the press secretary speculation, JD Vance praised Maria Bartiromo as 'an amazing person' and 'an amazing talent'
12 hours ago
Brendan Carr defended the FCC’s interpretation of the equal-time rule, while James Talarico and Jimmy Kimmel pushed back
13 hours ago
Ted Cruz faced repeated booing from the crowd when he appeared on ESPN's 'College GameDay' to promote the Protect College Sports Act
13 hours ago