Jim Acosta slammed as he says Supreme Court's delayed ruling on Donald Trump's immunity can create 'mess'

WASHINGTON, DC: CNN anchor Jim Acosta questioned the justices of the Supreme Court on Friday, June 21, inquiring as to whether they were aware that the longer they adjudicate former President Donald Trump's immunity case, the greater is the chance of creating a political "mess" in the nation.

The Supreme Court has not yet rendered a decision regarding Trump's immunity from prosecution in Special Counsel Jack Smith's case alleging election meddling.

What did CNN anchor Jim Acosta say about SCOTUS justices?

"Do [the justices] recognize that the longer they wait, the more of a mess potentially they could make politically for the country if we don't see a January 6 case go to trial before the November election, for example?" Acosta said on his show, per Fox News.

"Do these kinds of practical, real-world aspects of all of this, do they dawn on the justices of the court?" he added. "Maybe [it] dawns on some but not others."

The Supreme Court released a number of opinions on Friday, June 21

The Supreme Court did not rule on Trump's claim of immunity, but it did release a number of opinions on Friday, one of which upheld the federal gun ban for people subject to restraining orders stemming from domestic violence. Legal experts are divided on the case.

Barack Obama's ex-Attorney General Eric Holder worries SCOTUS is issuing a 'dangerous' ruling

On Thursday, former Obama Attorney General Eric Holder expressed concern over a "dangerous" decision from the Supreme Court.

"Anything less than a decision by the Supreme Court that says, ‘A president should be held to the laws, just like any other American citizen should be,’ anything other than that is absurd," Holder told MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace.

Donald Trump's lawyers' take a stand on his immunity issue

Trump's lawyers have argued that ruling against presidential immunity would cause similar prosecutions to "recur and become increasingly common, ushering in destructive cycles of recrimination."

"Criminal prosecution, with its greater stigma and more severe penalties, imposes a far greater ‘personal vulnerability’ on the President than any civil penalty," Trump’s lawyers wrote.

"The threat of future criminal prosecution by a politically opposed Administration will overshadow every future President’s official acts – especially the most politically controversial decisions," they added.

Internet says 'The left created the mess with fake charges!'

Netizens slammed Acosta for asking the Supreme Court justices regarding the former president's immunity case.

One X (formerly Twitter) user penned, "Then the opposite is true. They shouldn’t rule quickly."

Another added, "The left created the mess with fake charges!"

One user mocked, "I'm sure that the Justices are taking heed to Jim Acosra's warning, said no one!" while a second commented, "There is no warning, even, 'Your house is on fire!' that I would heed coming from Jim Acosta."

"I think the left is worried!! Prove me wrong!!" opined one and another remarked, "Nobody and I mean nobody is more bias and irrelevant than CNN and Jim Acosta!"

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.