Scott Jennings backs the need for Trump's name on US landmarks: 'They're 'gonna do you dirty'

Scott Jennings responded to reports that Trump proposed renaming Washington Dulles International Airport and New York City’s Penn Station after himself
PUBLISHED FEB 7, 2026
Conservative political commentator Scott Jennings explained Trump's potential rationale behind naming landmarks after himself (CNN, Getty Images)
Conservative political commentator Scott Jennings explained Trump's potential rationale behind naming landmarks after himself (CNN, Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: CNN conservative contributor Scott Jennings on Thursday, February 6, explained President Donald Trump’s must seek lasting recognition through the naming of major US landmarks. 

Speaking on NewsNight with Abby Phillip, Jennings argued that Trump cannot rely on posterity to preserve his legacy, given how unfairly he has been treated by political opponents so far.

Scott Jennings says Trump can’t trust others with his legacy

Jennings, responding to reports that Trump had floated the idea of releasing $16 billion in withheld infrastructure funding in exchange for renaming Washington Dulles International Airport and New York City’s Penn Station after himself.

Jennings said the proposal reflected a concern about how Trump’s presidency would be remembered once he leaves office.

Washington Dulles International Airport/Facebook
Trump has proposed renaming the Washington Dulles International Airport after himself (Washington Dulles International Airport/Facebook)

“Here’s my argument,” Jennings said. “You could not possibly trust, if you were Donald Trump, knowing everything you’ve been through, you could not possibly trust posterity…somebody doing you right, knowing full well they’re going to do you dirty.”

Jennings maintained that presidents often lose control of their historical narrative once out of power, particularly figures as polarising as Trump.

He argued that securing tangible recognition while in office was a rational response to that reality.

“If left to history and posterity, someone will always do this man dirty,” Jennings said. “He’s got to take care of himself.”

Critics say Trump’s demand is ‘bonkers’

Other panelists challenged the idea, questioning whether naming public infrastructure after a sitting president in exchange for funding was appropriate. 

Mediaite founder Dan Abrams even asked, “You don’t think that that’s kind of bonkers?” 

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - JULY 31: Dan Abrams attends Apple Original Films'
Dan Abrams attends Apple Original Films' "The Instigators" New York Premiere at Jazz at Lincoln Center on July 31, 2024 in New York City (Dia Dipasupil/WireImage)

Host Phillip called Trump’s idea “wild”.

Gen Z democratic activist Deja Foxx also countered Jennings, saying that legacy is shaped by a leader’s actions rather than symbols.

“To the people who come after, generations like mine, if he leaves a poor reflection, if he leaves a poor legacy, that’s his own doing,” Foxx said.

Phillip noted that holding the presidency already carries historic distinction, adding that presidents are not entitled to accolades simply for occupying the office.

Jennings rejected that framing, emphasising Trump’s electoral success. “He’s a two-term president,” he said. “He’s gonna get something.”



Trump says Democrats suggested renaming Dulles, Penn

Trump, meanwhile, denied reports that his administration proposed renaming Penn Station and Washington Dulles International Airport in exchange for federal funding for the Gateway rail tunnel.

He said the idea was suggested by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer— a Democrat.

(Getty Images)
President Donald Trump said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer suggested renaming landmarks after the Republican (Getty Images)

Speaking to reporters on February 6 aboard Air Force One, Trump said that no decision had been made and dismissed the reports as overstating the situation.

Schumer denied making the suggestion to rename said landmarks.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Ben Shapiro argued that Dave Smith blurred the line between groups targeting civilians and nation-states conducting military operations
8 hours ago
During a tense briefing, Karoline Leavitt accused Collins of mischaracterizing Pete Hegseth's remarks about media focus on fallen service members
9 hours ago
Elisabeth Hasselbeck argued that audience screening at the show reflected why national border controls were necessary amid global instability
11 hours ago
Jennings challenged claims of political silencing involving Talarico
13 hours ago
With exaggerated thanks, Newsom called the mock award ‘long overdue’
15 hours ago
Megyn Kelly's comments ignited backlash particularly among conservatives who support Trump's decision to authorize the strikes against Iran
1 day ago
Abby Phillip had challenged Scott Jennings on whether renewed bombing would meaningfully alter Iran’s political trajectory, particularly if previous strikes failed
1 day ago
Megyn Kelly criticized Scott Jennings for 'parroting' the administration’s claim that Iran was planning preemptive missile strikes on the US
2 days ago
Levin accused Carlson of engaging in 'fearmongering' and 'back-stabbing of our president'
2 days ago
Chuck Todd argued that the factor that had made JD Vance unique- his 'America First' credentials- was now 'non-existent' after the strikes
2 days ago