Sharyn Alfonsi accuses CBS of 'political' censorship after deportation report is pulled
NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK: A senior '60 Minutes' correspondent accused CBS News' leadership of making a “political” decision after her report on deportations to El Salvador was abruptly pulled just hours before it was set to air, according to an internal memo first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Sharyn Alfonsi, a longtime correspondent for the flagship news program, circulated the memo to staff after learning that her segment, 'Inside CECOT', had been removed from Sunday night’s broadcast lineup less than a day after it was publicly promoted.
Statement from CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss:
— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) December 22, 2025
"My job is to make sure that all stories we publish are the best they can be. Holding stories that aren’t ready for whatever reason — that they lack sufficient context, say, or that they are missing critical voices — happens… https://t.co/hTqRkM2X04
Memo alleges ‘political’ motive behind decision
In the memo obtained by The Wall Street Journal, Alfonsi directly blamed CBS News' Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss for the decision and said that requests for a discussion were denied.
“Our story was screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices,” Alfonsi wrote. “It is factually correct. In my view, pulling it now … is not an editorial decision, it is a political one.”
The segment focused on men deported to El Salvador’s CECOT maximum-security prison, a facility that has drawn scrutiny from advocacy groups. Alfonsi said that the reporting met all internal requirements before it was pulled.
Dispute over government response
Weiss reportedly raised concerns about the absence of an on-camera response from the Trump administration.
Alfonsi countered that the reporting team had repeatedly sought comment from the White House, the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department.
“Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story,” Alfonsi wrote, arguing that allowing silence to block publication would give officials undue control over coverage.
“If the standard for airing a story becomes ‘the government must agree to be interviewed’, then the government effectively gains control over the broadcast,” she added.
CBS defends editorial judgment
In a public statement, Weiss defended the move as a routine editorial decision, saying her role was to ensure that stories are complete and include “critical voices.” CBS echoed that position, stating that the piece required “additional reporting.”
Still, Alfonsi warned that pulling the segment after extensive promotion would be perceived by viewers as corporate censorship, writing that the network was risking its long-standing reputation.
“We are trading 50 years of ‘Gold Standard’ reputation for a single week of political quiet,” she wrote.
Alleged fallout inside the newsroom
Multiple sources told CNN that staffers have privately questioned whether they can continue working under the current leadership. The controversy follows recent public criticism of '60 Minutes' by President Donald Trump and comes amid broader changes at CBS following Paramount’s takeover and leadership restructuring.
Alfonsi concluded her memo by stressing her commitment to the program, writing that she was unwilling to watch it be “dismantled without a fight.”