Tim Walz attacks GOP for 'cutting hairs on IVF or IUI' after misrepresenting family's fertility treatment
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: During a joint interview with CNN's Dana Bash on Thursday evening, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, who is the running mate of Vice President Kamala Harris, addressed several Republican criticisms regarding his personal background.
Walz was confronted with accusations that he had misrepresented details about his family's fertility treatments and his past arrest record.
CNN's Dana Bash confronts Tim Walz on past statements
Dana Bash highlighted the controversy, stating, "You had to clarify that you had said that you and your wife used IVF, but it turned out you used a different kind of fertility in order to have children. And then when you ran for Congress in 2006, your campaign repeatedly made false statements about a 1995 arrest for drunk and reckless driving. What do you say to voters who aren't sure whether they can take you at your word?"
In response, Walz acknowledged his mistakes but emphasized the importance of focusing on the broader issues at hand.
"Well, I've been very public," Walz said. "I think they can see my students come out, former folks I've served with, and they do vouch for me. I certainly own my mistakes when I make them."
Tim Walz expresses frustration over political climate and reproductive rights
Walz further articulated his position on the matter, expressing frustration with the current political climate.
"The one thing I'll tell you is, I wish this country wouldn't have to do this," Walz remarked.
"I spoke about our infertility issues because it's health, and families know this, and I spoke about the treatments that were available to us that had those beautiful children there. That's quite a contrast. And folks that are trying to take those rights away from us. And so I think people know who I am. They know that record. They've seen that I've taught thousands of students. I've been out there and I won't apologize for speaking passionately, whether it's guns in schools or protecting reproductive rights."
Walz emphasized the clear distinction between his stance and that of his opponents.
"The contrast could not be clearer between what we're running against, the vice president's position on this ... and I think most Americans get it if you've been through that, I don't think they're cutting hairs on IVF or IUI," Walz said.
"I think they're cutting hairs on an abortion ban and the ability to be able to deny families the chance to have a beautiful child."
Tim Walz's fertility treatment controversy
In March, after an Alabama court halted in vitro fertilization procedures, Tim Walz publicly discussed his and his wife Gwen’s struggles with infertility, framing IVF as a central part of their journey. His campaign even sent out fundraising emails titled “our IVF journey,” reinforcing the narrative.
Walz also criticized Ohio Senator and Trump's VP pick JD Vance, saying, “If it was up to him, I wouldn’t have a family because of IVF,” implying that IVF was crucial in his family having children.
However, in a recent statement, hsi wife Gwen contradicted this narrative by revealing that they had actually undergone intrauterine insemination (IUI), not IVF.
She stated, “We kept it largely to ourselves at the time – not even sharing the details with our wonderful and close family.” Gwen explained that they had relied on a neighbor, saying, “She was a nurse and helped me with the shots I needed as part of the IUI process.”
IUI, a less invasive procedure, involves inserting sperm directly into the uterus, unlike IVF, which involves creating embryos in a lab.
Despite the contradiction, a campaign spokesperson defended Walz, stating, “Governor Walz talks how normal people talk. He was using commonly understood shorthand for fertility treatments.”
This discrepancy has drawn criticism, with some, including Vance, accusing Walz of misleading the public.
Vance wrote, “Today it came out that Tim Walz had lied about having a family via IVF. Who lies about something like that?”
The incident has added to the scrutiny of Walz’s personal and political narrative.