Trump disputes adviser’s assessment of an alleged Israeli nuclear threat

Trump pushes back on Sacks’s nuclear warning, insists Israel ‘would never’ use nuclear weapons
Trump dismissed 'frightening scenarios' of nuclear escalation, saying Israel would not resort to such measures in the current conflict (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Trump dismissed 'frightening scenarios' of nuclear escalation, saying Israel would not resort to such measures in the current conflict (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

WASHINGTON, DC: President Donald Trump on Monday, March 16, rejected a claim made by his AI and crypto advisor, David Sacks, about the possibility of Israel using nuclear weapons in the conflict with Iran.

During a White House question-and-answer session with reporters, Trump responded directly when asked about Sacks’s comments suggesting a prolonged war could push Israel toward considering a nuclear strike.

“No, he hasn’t [shared that assessment]. Israel wouldn’t do that. Israel would never do that,” Trump told RealClearPolitics reporter Philip Wegmann. The response followed remarks made by Sacks on the All-In podcast, where he warned that extended conflict could escalate dramatically if large areas of Israel came under threat.



Rejection of the exit strategy theory

Trump also addressed Sacks’s suggestion that the United States should consider ending its military involvement after weakening Iran’s capabilities.

On the podcast, Sacks argued that Washington could “declare victory and get out” once Iran’s military infrastructure had been significantly damaged.

The President acknowledged that some advisers view an early exit as a strategic option.

However, Trump said leaving the conflict before a definitive outcome could allow Iran to rebuild its military capabilities in the future.



He said previous administrations had faced similar strategic decisions and suggested that some former leaders had later expressed regret for not acting more aggressively at earlier stages.

Warning against regional escalation spiral

Sacks had also raised concerns about the broader regional consequences of a prolonged war.

In his comments, he warned that escalation could damage critical infrastructure across the Gulf region, including desalination facilities that supply water to several countries.

According to Sacks, attacks on such infrastructure could create severe humanitarian and economic consequences across the Middle East. Trump, however, focused his remarks on the current state of military operations.

He said the administration believes sustained pressure is necessary to address what he described as a long-standing security challenge involving Iran.

As the conflict continues into its third week, Trump’s comments signal that the administration is not currently considering the withdrawal approach suggested by some advisers and instead plans to maintain its current strategy.

RELATED TOPICS US STRIKES IRAN

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Greene argued that video clips of Trump’s past promises are widely available and should have been reviewed by staff
1 hour ago
The Democrat claims that Trump has ‘fallen asleep in public’ and questioned his fitness for office
2 hours ago
Pulte fight complicates Trump’s push to extend key surveillance authority
2 hours ago
Court rejected request to kill $1.776B fund, but warns DOJ against deceptive tactics
3 hours ago
Donald Trump said his public criticism sped up California vote counting and helped Steve Hilton move ahead in the race
3 hours ago
Trump's proposal faced resistance from Senate GOP much like the SAVE America Act
3 hours ago
The Georgia Republican, one of Trump's most loyal allies for years, stunned many conservatives by using unusually harsh language
4 hours ago
Donald Trump accused Iran of delaying negotiations and warned of consequences before US airstrikes targeted Iranian military infrastructure
4 hours ago
Trump argued energy costs temporarily pushed prices higher and said inflation would decline once the Iran conflict ends
5 hours ago
The dispute is expected to intensify as courts weigh the policy, which the Trump administration has defended as a lawful measure to protect elections
11 hours ago