Trump was 'mad' and 'suspicious' as to why NSA Mike Waltz had Atlantic reporter stored in his contacts

Though Trump stood by Mike Waltz publicly, but behind the scenes, it was a different story
A new report claims President Donald Trump wasn’t just upset with National Security Adviser Mike Waltz over the Signal chat leak, he was downright 'suspicious' (Getty Images)
A new report claims President Donald Trump wasn’t just upset with National Security Adviser Mike Waltz over the Signal chat leak, he was downright 'suspicious' (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: A bombshell new report has revealed that President Donald Trump wasn’t just upset with National Security Adviser Mike Waltz over the Signal chat leak, he was downright "suspicious."

Trump stood by Waltz publicly, telling NBC’s Garrett Haake, "Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he's a good man." But behind the scenes, it was a different story.  

U.S. President Donald Trump addresses Gov. Janet Mills (D-ME) after she said
President Donald Trump addressed a meeting of governors at the White House on February 21, 2025, in Washington, DC (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Donald Trump’s growing distrust in wake of Signal group chat leak

The president reportedly questioned why Waltz even had Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg’s phone number saved in the first place.

"Trump was mad — and suspicious — that Waltz had Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg’s number saved in his phone in the first place," Politico reported, citing three sources familiar with the situation.

A fourth source added that Trump was particularly enraged by how embarrassing the situation had become.

"The president was pissed that Waltz could be so stupid," one insider revealed.

U.S. President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on March 3, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump announced that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, one of the largest manufacturers of semiconductor chips, plans to invest $100 billion in new manufacturing facilities in the United States. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on March 3, 2025, in Washington, DC (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

But "despite spending Monday questioning whether Waltz needed to resign, the White House and its allies on Tuesday sought to downplay the sensitivity of the information shared in the group chat," the report stated.

"Officials suggested the national security community, in collaboration with the media, was making a bigger deal out of the issue than it was, arguing the material was not classified and suggesting Goldberg had sensationalized the content."

Damage control begins after Signal group chat leak

By Tuesday afternoon, the White House had gone into full damage-control mode. Trump made sure to be seen publicly backing Waltz, giving quick interviews to NBC News and Fox News where he pledged his support.

Meanwhile, his top spokespeople suggested on X that national security hawks and the media were blowing the situation out of proportion. 

Waltz tried to regain his footing by attending a meeting of Trump’s ambassadors, where he doubled down on his innocence.

“There’s a lot of journalists in this city who have made big names for themselves making up lies … This one in particular I’ve never met, don’t know, never communicated with, and we are looking into and reviewing how the heck he got into this room,” Waltz insisted.



 

Despite this, Trump made it clear he wasn’t letting the issue slide completely. While he called Waltz “a very good man," he also announced he would be investigating the use of Signal among government officials to prevent further security breaches.

Lingering tensions in Donald Trump’s inner circle

Even though Trump publicly played the role of a forgiving leader, sources close to him say Waltz’s relationship with the administration’s inner circle has been seriously strained. One Trump ally warned to Politico that this may not be the end of Waltz’s troubles.

Trump and his team have long been wary of leaks, closely monitoring who speaks to which reporters. Unlike his first term, Trump’s second White House has been relatively leak-free - largely due to the tight grip of Chief of Staff Susie Wiles

 U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a Cabinet Meeting at the White House on February 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump is holding the first Cabinet meeting of his second term, joined by Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Trump was joined by Secretary of State Marco Rubio (L) and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a Cabinet Meeting at the White House on February 26, 2025, in Washington, DC (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Every staffer was pre-vetted for loyalty, and any whiff of unauthorized communication with the press is taken as a serious red flag.

In fact, one Trump ally even admitted to going through the phone of a suspected leaker, trying to determine which journalists they had been in contact with. Another adviser said they have intentionally spread false information just to see where leaks might originate from.

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on February 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump is holding the first Cabinet meeting of his second term, joined by Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on February 26, 2025, in Washington, DC (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

"That made the Monday episode a particularly embarrassing blunder for an administration that has spent two months arguing it will not tolerate leaks," Politico reported, adding that "not only was the leak of sensitive military details by top officials a clumsy accident, it also involved a reporter and an outlet the administration sees as diametrically opposed to its agenda."

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

In the message, Katie Porter urged supporters with a forceful anti-Trump tone, encouraging political opposition ahead of the upcoming election cycle
47 minutes ago
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Democrats backed nonpartisan redistricting but now need a different approach
2 hours ago
Rubio told reporters he was there to carry out a joke, even striking a pose behind the lectern and drawing a few laughs from the room before heading back to his day job
3 hours ago
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker condemned the US Supreme Court ruling on voting maps, warning it weakens democratic protections nationwide
3 hours ago
Bernie Sanders cited $2.1 trillion for Iraq, $2.3 trillion for Afghanistan, and $1 trillion for Iran, highlighting the massive scale of US war spending
5 hours ago
Hakeem Jeffries said Donald Trump scrapped Obama-era policies, calling the Iran deal exit a destabilizing move driven by 'Obama derangement syndrome'
5 hours ago
Kamala Harris warned the ruling strips key voting protections and enables states to rush redistricting, risking diluted power for minority voters
5 hours ago
Writing for the majority, Alito agreed that the map was an “unconstitutional gerrymander,” noting that the legal standard for using race in redistricting had not been met
5 hours ago
JD Vance questioned whether Tim Walz had been directly involved or had simply ignored warning signs
7 hours ago
In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s congressional map, ruling that race was used as the predominant factor in violation of the 14th Amendment.
7 hours ago