Alan Dershowitz lashes out at ‘redeemed’ Epstein survivor in heated rant

While acknowledging there had been real victims in the Epstein case, Alan Dershowitz had said many accusations were exaggerated or false
Alan Dershowitz pushed back against Greta Van Susteren’s characterization of survivor Maria Farmer during an interview (Screengrab/Newsmax)
Alan Dershowitz pushed back against Greta Van Susteren’s characterization of survivor Maria Farmer during an interview (Screengrab/Newsmax)


WASHINGTON, DC: Attorney Alan Dershowitz took a jab at Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer as news reports claimed she had been "redeemed" after documents released by the Justice Department proved she had reported the disgraced financier years ago.

During a Newsmax interview on Tuesday, December 22, Dershowitz began by taking issue with host Greta Van Susteren's description of the Epstein survivor.

Alan Dershowitz calls Epstein survivor a 'total nut job'

Alan Dershowitz said during the interview, "Can I correct something you said? You said that the woman... was vindicated? She wasn't vindicated! This is Maria Farmer. She is a complete and total nut job."

"Of course, the FBI didn't believe her in 1996! She's a complete nutcase except to CNN. CNN has her on every day," he added. Meanwhile, host Greta Van Susteren said, "And apparently to me, because I took the bait too," noting that she had interviewed Farmer.

However, Dershowitz added, "Maria Farmer said she saw me once in Jeffrey Epstein's house before I ever met Jeffrey Epstein! I mean, she sees ghosts! This is a completely non-credible nut case that nobody should believe! Just because it's in the files doesn't make it true!" 

In this handout, the mug shot of Jeffrey Epstein, 2019. (Photo by Kypros/Getty Images)
In this handout, the mug shot of Jeffrey Epstein, 2019 (Kypros/Getty Images)

"The same women, the same, what do they call themselves, survivors who claim that they want transparency. They want transparency for thee, but not for me. They don't want transparency about the women who themselves were procuring young girls for Jeffrey Epstein and getting paid $250. They don't want that kind of transparency," he mentioned.

Additionally, Dershowitz acknowledged that there were "real victims" in the Epstein case but downplayed their stories.

He complained, "Because no congressman, senator, and except for you and a few other people, no member of the media is prepared to get up and say, I doubt the words of these accusers, I doubt the words of these victims, I doubt the words of these survivors!" 

Friend of Presidents, the ultra-rich and the elite of Wall Street's bankers Jeff Epstein remains an enigma to many in the world of finance despite handling portfolio's estimated to be worth over $15 billion. (Photo by Rick Friedman/Corbis via Getty Images)
A picture of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein (Rick Friedman/Corbis via Getty Images)

Meanwhile, an Susteren said, "I mean, you're telling me that I got it wrong about this woman. I mean, how do I know that? Except that I'm lucky enough to have, you know, booked you."

Dershowitz mentioned, "If you dare, dare to suggest that some of these alleged victims and survivors are phonies, and they're making up stories for their own lining their own pocket, you're called a victim-shamer, and you're called an Epstein supporter. Well, I'm prepared to take that on. Where's the ACLU? They're supposed to defend civil liberties!"

Epstein survivor Jess Michaels says DOJ has broken law

Epstein survivor Jess Michaels believes there will be no more context or explanations by the authorities about the redactions in the newly released Epstein files.

During an interview with CNN, host Erika Hill asked Michaels, "Given the fact that it lasted so long, you and your fellow survivors have been fighting for so long not just for the release but to also have your voices heard. We did hear from Todd Blanche that there will be more coming. Do you believe that it will all come out? Do you also belive that there will be more context and explanation for these redactions?" 

Michael Jackson and Jeffrey Epstein seen together in this photo released by the Justice Department on Friday, December 19. (Department of Justice)
Michael Jackson and Jeffrey Epstein seen together in this photo released by the Justice Department on Friday, December 19, 2025 (Department of Justice)

"No. I think the law was clear that the deadline was 11:59 PM on December 19, and once that time frame was crossed, we have broken the law. The Department of Justice has broken the law," Jess Michaels said.

She added, "I see no dancing around that, no giving levy, because this has been going on, in recent years, for months, since the administration decided to seal everything and close the investigation."

Michaels also mentioned, "For many of us it has been going on for more than 30 years. I have been living with PTSD since 1991."

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

'I call them stupid borders, not open. I call them stupid borders by stupid people that put them there,' Trump said, highlighting the Angel Moms
6 hours ago
Ocasio-Cortez fueled speculation after framing her political goals around reshaping the country, not chasing titles
7 hours ago
Marco Rubio met with Pope Leo XIV on Thursday, May 7, in the first meeting between the Catholic leader and a Trump Cabinet official in nearly a year
8 hours ago
Speculation intensified after Marco Rubio’s response about a 'hopeful vision of America' during an interview with a Christian TV network went viral
8 hours ago
Despite continuing military operations, Trump has repeatedly signaled that he would prefer a negotiated settlement over a prolonged war
9 hours ago
'You were mistreated by the Biden Pentagon and we are fixing that injustice,' Pete Hegseth said
9 hours ago
Gavin Newsom blasted MAGA Republicans after Virginia’s Supreme Court blocked a map that favored Democrats
9 hours ago
Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said Donald Trump signaled openness to dialogue as US pressure on Cuba rises
9 hours ago
'The intelligence community properly assessed that targeting Iranian leadership would strengthen the regime and embolden hardliners', Kent wrote.
17 hours ago
Marco Rubio said NATO allies were expected to help during 'contingencies', but failed to back recent US strikes on Iran
18 hours ago