Brandon Tatum arranges security for Nick Shirley after daycare fraud expose
🔥🚨BREAKING: Brandon Tatum revealed he arranged security to protect journalist Nick Shirley.
— Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) December 28, 2025
Tatum: ‘because telling the truth in the streets shouldn’t be a death sentence. Protecting voices like Nick matters if we want real journalism to survive, we have to keep… pic.twitter.com/yzEIPvCXVw
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA: Conservative political commentator Brandon Tatum revealed that he arranged private security for independent journalist Nick Shirley after the latter’s videos alleging daycare fraud in Minnesota began drawing widespread attention online. Tatum shared the details during a conversation with Shirley, stressing that no one should feel unsafe for expressing their views or reporting on controversial issues.
The discussion came amid growing online debate around Shirley’s investigative content, which has sparked strong reactions across social media. Tatum said the decision to step in was driven by concern for safety, especially as public discourse continues to grow more hostile toward journalists and commentators.
Brandon Tatum arranged security after raising safety concerns
Tatum explained that his decision to help arrange security stemmed from conversations he had with Shirley about personal safety and the current climate surrounding political discourse. He said people should be able to disagree without fear of violence or intimidation.
“I was telling you the other day about making sure you’re safe. This world is crazy. You shouldn’t have to worry,” Tatum said. “You should be able to give your opinion, and someone can say they don’t like it, and you both walk away.”
He added that disagreement should never escalate into threats or physical harm. According to Tatum, open discussion and debate are essential, but recent trends have made those conversations increasingly dangerous.
“You should be able to talk things out. But now people don’t want to argue. They want to hurt you,” he said, pointing to what he described as a troubling shift in public behavior.
Nick Shirley explains why security became necessary
Shirley responded by acknowledging that personal security is often overlooked until a real threat emerges. He said the attention surrounding his recent reporting made him reassess how exposed he had become.
“Security is something you don’t think about until you need it,” Shirley said. “You don’t want to realize that after the fact. When you reached out and said you had people who could help, especially for this video, that meant a lot.”
He added that the reaction to his reporting made safety a serious concern, particularly given the emotional responses surrounding the topic.
Nick Shirley alleges widespread fraud in Minnesota daycare funding
Shirley recently gained national attention after publishing a video focused on alleged fraud within Minnesota’s daycare system. The video, titled “Example of the Billions $$ of fraud taking place in Minnesota,” circulated widely across social media platforms.
In the footage, Shirley visited a daycare facility and questioned whether it was actively operating as claimed. He spoke with a resident while examining how certain centers may have continued receiving large sums of government funding.
Shirley alleged that one daycare received approximately $1.9 million in tax-exempt funding through the Child Care Assistance Program, despite showing little evidence of active operations. The claims sparked online debate, with supporters calling for investigations and critics urging caution over the conclusions being drawn.
The video has since fueled broader discussions about oversight, accountability, and transparency in publicly funded childcare programs across the state.
Public reaction continues to grow
As the conversation continues online, both supporters and critics have weighed in on Shirley’s claims and Tatum’s decision to step in. While some praised the move as a necessary safety measure, others questioned the broader implications of the allegations.
For now, the incident has placed renewed attention on the risks journalists can face when covering contentious topics and the growing tensions surrounding public accountability debates.