Chris Van Hollen shares alcohol test results, challenges Kash Patel to take same test

FBI hearing turns tense as Van Hollen questions Patel over media report allegations
Van Hollen posted his drinking test results online and challenged FBI Director Kash Patel to undergo the same test after a heated Senate exchange (Getty Images, AP Photos)
Van Hollen posted his drinking test results online and challenged FBI Director Kash Patel to undergo the same test after a heated Senate exchange (Getty Images, AP Photos)

WASHINGTON, DC: A heated Capitol Hill exchange from Tuesday spilled onto social media on Wednesday, May 13 after Senator Chris Van Hollen publicly released the results of his alcohol screening test and challenged FBI Director Kash Patel to keep a promise he made during a tense Senate hearing. 

The post quickly turned a combative oversight session into a very public test of credibility between the two men.



Chris Van Hollen's test results go public

Hours after their fiery exchange, Van Hollen posted the results of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, better known as the AUDIT, a screening tool used to assess alcohol-related behavioral risks.

“Kash Patel told me he’d take the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test if I did. Well, here’s mine,” the Maryland Democrat wrote online while sharing his completed assessment.

He then directly challenged Patel to do the same. “Given all the lies he told yesterday, I imagine he’ll fudge the numbers here, but let’s see yours, Director Patel.”

The challenge came after Patel had agreed, on the record, to take the same test during a contentious Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing.

“I’ll take any test you’re willing to take,” Patel had told Van Hollen. When the senator accepted, Patel fired back saying “Let’s go. Side by side.”

Van Hollen’s posted results showed he reported drinking alcohol two to three times per week, while answering “never” to the remaining behavioral-risk questions on the survey.



Fiery senate showdown draws focus

The clash erupted during a budget hearing focused on the FBI, where Van Hollen questioned Patel over allegations raised in a recent media report about his conduct and work habits.

The senator argued that concerns about a public official’s private conduct become relevant when they affect professional responsibilities.

“When your private actions make it impossible for you to perform your public duties, we have a big problem,” Van Hollen told Patel during the hearing.

Patel strongly denied the accusations, calling them “unequivocally and categorically false.”

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 26: Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) speaks at a news conference on the Trump Administration's planned cuts to the Social Security Administration at the Capitol on March 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. The news conference comes a day after Frank Bisignano, U.S. President Donald Trump's nominee to be Commissioner of Social Security Administration, testified before the Senate Finance Committee and faced questions over proposed DOGE cuts and the agency's ability to process and distribute benefit checks. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Sen Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) speaks at a news conference on the Trump Administration's planned cuts to the Social Security Administration at the Capitol on March 26, 2025 in Washington, DC (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

The hearing then quickly deteriorated into a personal exchange, with Patel accusing Van Hollen of hypocrisy and bringing up the senator’s controversial trip to El Salvador earlier.

Patel also referenced campaign expenses tied to a Washington event, intensifying what had already become one of the most combative moments of the hearing.

The confrontation followed reporting that questioned Patel’s alleged drinking habits and claimed there were occasions when staff struggled to reach him while he was off duty.

Patel has flatly denied those claims and has accused the media of pushing what he described as false and politically motivated allegations.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

The filing sought to add an obstruction charge but had not undergone judicial review to determine whether probable cause existed
2026-10-28T05:53:45.000Z
Trump made the remarks at a rally one week before the midterm elections, where he has been campaigning for Republican candidates
2026-10-28T04:53:00.000Z
Kamala Harris called impeaching Donald Trump 'not a good idea,' urging Democrats to prioritize investigations and accountability instead
2026-10-28T03:53:46.000Z
The investigation focused on Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony before the House committee investigating the January 6 attack in 2022
2026-10-28T03:32:05.000Z
Trump announced a proposed rollback of Biden-era methane regulations, claiming it would save $45 billion and boost Texas energy production as Republicans fight to retain the Senate seat
2026-10-28T02:56:04.000Z
Mike Waltz accused Cuba’s leadership of profiting from forced labour and confiscated assets, telling Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla to 'back up!' during the heated exchange
2026-10-28T02:01:58.000Z
The president ran three different polls asking users to choose a new name for AI: “Super Intelligence,” “Extreme Intelligence” and “Supreme Intelligence”
2026-10-27T20:05:39.000Z
Trump’s remarks about Minnesota’s election drew criticism from Democratic leaders, including Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.), who accused the president of “laying the groundwork” to “steal” the election
2026-10-27T19:02:52.000Z
In a letter written to Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said it has identified 1,500 votes cast by more than 400 people in previous elections
2026-10-27T17:21:36.000Z
The contentious battle between conservationists and Trump came to limelight earlier this month when judge Reyes rebuked government attorney for claiming they were unaware that trees had been removed from the park
2026-10-27T15:20:48.000Z