Democratic states file new lawsuit to block Trump’s mail voting restrictions ahead of midterms

About two dozen Democratic states filed a new USPS lawsuit after the Supreme Court rejected their earlier challenge without ruling Trump’s order legal
A coalition of 24 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia filed a new federal lawsuit on August 26, 2026, seeking to block USPS from enforcing President Donald Trump’s mail-in voting restrictions ahead of the November midterm elections (Getty I
A coalition of 24 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia filed a new federal lawsuit on August 26, 2026, seeking to block USPS from enforcing President Donald Trump’s mail-in voting restrictions ahead of the November midterm elections (Getty I

WASHINGTON, DC: Democratic-controlled states have filed a new lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s restrictions on mail-in voting, after the Supreme Court cleared the way for the US Postal Service to implement the policy.

The lawsuit argues that the Postal Service lacks authority to impose federal election requirements on states. The legal fight comes with the 2026 midterm elections approaching and the first wave of mail ballots expected to be sent next week.

Democratic states challenge Postal Service rule

The new lawsuit, led by California, Massachusetts, Nevada and Washington, was filed after the Postal Service formally published its final rule governing the delivery of mail-in ballots. About two dozen Democratic-controlled states are involved in the challenge.



The states argue that the Postal Service cannot establish rules governing federal elections or determine which voters are eligible to receive mail ballots. “Congress has not afforded USPS any authority whatsoever to set rules for federal elections or mail voting, even though Americans have cast ballots by mail for generations,” the lawsuit states.

FILE - Employees sort vote-by-mail ballots from municipal elections on Election Day at the Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Elections Office, Nov. 4, 2025, in Doral, Fla. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky, File)
Employees sort vote-by-mail ballots from municipal elections on Election Day at the Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Elections Office, Nov 4, 2025, in Doral, Fla (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky, File)

The Postal Service rule requires states to meet specific design requirements for mail-in ballots, including unique barcodes and an official logo. States must also provide the agency with lists of voters who are eligible to vote by mail. Under the rule, ballots that do not meet the requirements or are associated with voters who are not included on the submitted lists could be refused delivery.

Democratic lawmakers voice their opposition to the ruling 

New York Attorney General Letitia James, one of 24 Democratic attorneys general involved in the lawsuit, said states were already preparing for the upcoming elections when the administration moved to implement the new requirements.

“The federal government is attempting to meddle and potentially threaten countless Americans’ right to vote,” James said. “USPS has no authority to decide who can and cannot vote by mail.”



Democratic Governor Josh Shapiro said he was suing to prevent what he described as an "unconstitutional attempt" to change voting rules.



“I’m suing the Trump Administration to stop their unconstitutional attempt to change the rules and restrict mail-in voting,” Shapiro said in a post on X. “I’ll remind the President of my track record going up against him in court, and winning, to protect Pennsylvania’s free, fair, safe, and secure elections.”



House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries also echoed Shapiro's statement in a post on X, writing, "his unconstitutional anti-mail voting order threatens your constitutional rights, and we are moving to strike it down immediately.” 

Court ruling removes earlier block

The lawsuit follows US District Judge Indira Talwani’s decision to lift an earlier injunction blocking the policy, saying she was “compelled” to do so after the Supreme Court deemed the states’ initial challenge premature. 



The Supreme Court justices found that the states had not established their right to challenge the order at that stage, while leaving open the possibility of a legal challenge once the Postal Service adopted rules implementing it. With the Postal Service now having issued its final rule, the states argue that the legal dispute is ripe for review.

President Donald Trump speaks during a back to school event in the Rose Garden of the White House, Monday, Aug. 24, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
President Donald Trump speaks during a back to school event in the Rose Garden of the White House, Monday, Aug. 24, 2026, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Talwani also previously described Trump’s executive order as “likely unconstitutional” and warned that it could create “chaos.”

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

The NRSC claimed Obama was shifting focus to the Senate after Democrats were projected to win the House, warning they could flip four Senate seats
5 hours ago
The Trump administration has canceled 63 awards worth a combined $186 million as part of its efforts to reduce government spending
6 hours ago
A Continental Strategy spokesperson said Katie Wiles visited Republika Srpska for business, while Susie Wiles does not discuss work with her daughters
7 hours ago
Donald Trump accused Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz of failing residents as Attorney General Keith Ellison pushed back against his rhetoric
7 hours ago
Jon Ossoff challenged Mike Collins over alleged ties between his associates and extremist groups while clashing over tariffs, Iran and Medicaid cuts
8 hours ago
Troy Jackson’s campaign alleged Susan Collins and her husband hold up to $100,000 in oil and gas stocks, profiting from rising prices
8 hours ago
The lawsuit sought to halt arch construction at Memorial Circle until the National Park Service completed the required environmental assessments
8 hours ago
Abdul El-Sayed dismissed the question as a 'ridiculous hypothetical,' arguing that both countries had demonstrated dangerous behavior
8 hours ago
Donald Trump defended his comments by contrasting temporary fuel price hikes with the potential consequences of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, drawing criticism from California leaders
10 hours ago
Ken Paxton accused media outlets of taking his comments out of context, insisting he never said he would cut benefits for eligible recipients
10 hours ago