Fact Check: Does viral photo show unmasked ICE agent who shot Renee Nicole Good?
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA: Following the fatal shooting of a woman during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation in Minneapolis, a photo began circulating online that allegedly showed the unmasked face of the ICE agent who fired the shots. The image spread rapidly across social media platforms, prompting speculation and outrage. Let us fact-check the claims.
Claim: Viral image shows ICE agent’s face
“This is Renee’s killer… still on the loose being protected by Trump!!” read one widely shared post on X, accompanied by a photo that appeared to show the face of the ICE agent involved in the shooting.
This is Renee’s killer….still on the loose being protected by Trump!! pic.twitter.com/GhmyX99LFs
— bry (@cartierbry) January 7, 2026
The image began circulating on Wednesday, January 7, shortly after Renee Nicole Good was fatally shot during an ICE encounter in Minneapolis. In verified footage from the incident, the ICE agent who fired the weapon was wearing a face covering. Despite this, several social media users claimed they had identified the agent by sharing an image of a man with no mask.
As the shooting drew national attention, the photo spread quickly, with users asserting it revealed the identity of the agent involved. The image was shared thousands of times as people searched for answers and accountability.
Fact Check: Viral image was AI-altered
Hey @grok remove his mask!
— just jamie (@buttz_and_guttz) January 7, 2026
That is how this works right? pic.twitter.com/6BNG7McbWS
The circulating image did not genuinely show the ICE agent involved in the fatal shooting.
A review of the posts shows the photo was manipulated using X’s artificial intelligence assistant, Grok. Users took a still frame from video footage of the incident and used AI prompts to digitally remove the agent’s mask and generate a face that did not exist in the original footage.
Several posts explicitly showed users prompting Grok with commands such as “remove his mask,” resulting in multiple altered versions of the same image. These AI-generated faces varied across posts, a key indicator that the images were fabricated.
Minnesota reporter Max Nesterak shared video footage of the shooting on X on the day it occurred. The manipulated image originated from a frame at approximately the 58-second mark of that video. Comparisons between the original footage and the viral images show clear discrepancies in facial features, lighting, and proportions.
As of this writing, no verified public image or official identification of the ICE agent has been released. Some news outlets identified the agent as Jonathan Ross, who was previously linked to a separate vehicular incident in June 2025. However, no official photograph confirming his identity in this case has been made public.
The altered images circulating online do not match the appearance of the agent visible in the video, further confirming that the photos were digitally generated rather than authentic.
ICE operation escalates into deadly encounter
Video of the Minneapolis ICE shooting completely contradicting ICE's account that the driver was trying to ram anyone. Looks like they were turning around to leave, and immediately lit up pic.twitter.com/PwUZkPkIVt
— Abject Zero (@AbjectZero) January 7, 2026
The shooting occurred amid a federal immigration enforcement surge targeting the Twin Cities area. The operation involved a significant deployment of federal agents across Minneapolis and St Paul, marking one of the most aggressive crackdowns in the region in recent years.
Video footage of the incident quickly spread online, drawing scrutiny of the Department of Homeland Security account. DHS later described Renee Nicole Good as a “domestic terrorist,” alleging that she attempted to weaponize her vehicle against law enforcement officers.
However, the available video evidence did not appear to support that characterization. In the footage, the vehicle appeared to be turning away from agents moments before shots were fired, contradicting official claims.
As investigations and public debate continue, officials have urged the public to avoid spreading unverified or manipulated images, noting that AI-altered content can inflame tensions and distort understanding of ongoing cases.