FBI seeks interviews with six Democrats after their video urging troops to defy ‘illegal orders’

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ FBI's demand to question six Democratic representatives has resulted in an rare bi-partisan support of protection of Congressional authority
PUBLISHED 1 HOUR AGO
The Federal Bureau of Investigation aspires to seek interviews with six Democrats (Getty Images).
The Federal Bureau of Investigation aspires to seek interviews with six Democrats (Getty Images).

WASHINGTON, DC: Agents​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have sought six Democratic members of the Congress for interviews after a video in which they called US military personnel to disobey orders considered illegal.



This action escalates a political and legal standoff that has been going on due to the response of the president, Donald Trump, who said that the lawmakers’ behavior was ‘seditious’ and that it deserved a severe ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌reaction.

Who are the six Democrats being investigated?

The FBI​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ agents have asked House and Senate sergeants-at-arms to organize interviews with six members of Congress, according to a Justice Department official. This is said to be a move to figure out whether there is a legal basis for opening a probe.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and Director of the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Tim Boring host a listening session with Michigan farmers and agriculture industry leaders on tariffs, immigration, H5N1, and rural economic development on March 20, 2025 in Sparta, Michigan. The session comes two days after Michigan farmers held a
Sen Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) is the senator who posted the video on her X account and is among the six being interviewed (Chris duMond/Getty Images)

The senators are Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich) and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz), and the representatives are Jason Crow (D-Colo), Maggie Goodlander (D-NH), Chris Deluzio (D-Pa), and Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa).

As per the report, the video asked the military and the intelligence community to follow their oath to the Constitution rather than any order they might consider unlawful.

The administration's response to this message was very strong, including a public accusation of sedition by Trump and a related investigation at the Pentagon for Senator ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌Kelly.

Democrats respond with affirmation

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ four House Democrats in a joint statement called the FBI’s demand a politically motivated effort to ‘intimidate and harass Members of Congress,’ and denied such behavior. They pledged their loyalty to the constitution and promised that they would not be silenced.



Senator Slotkin also shared that view and said the FBI operation through its counterterrorism division was ‘a scare tactic’ to frighten people and prevent them from speaking their opinion and protesting.

On the other hand, Senator Kelly a former Navy officer - referred to the Pentagon's investigation alongside the FBI as "an intimidation move" and assured that he would not be ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌silenced.

What led to this?

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ situation unfolded earlier this week when the Defense Department announced that it was formally initiating a separate investigation into Senator Mark Kelly. The department stated that as a former Navy captain, the senator is still under the jurisdiction of the ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌UCMJ.

(Screengrab/CNN, Getty Images)
Mark Kelly has been under heat from the Trump led administration (Getty Images)

On​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ the other hand, Trump kept escalating the language by charging the representatives with “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” and then he was “not threatening death.”



The fight has additionally brought back questions of the constitution: experts in law have observed that apart from issues related to the First Amendment, the Speech or Debate Clause of Article I shields the members of the Congress from any legal actions for the operations of the legislative branch - a protection system, which is intended to stop the president from having too much power and to secure the separation of powers; thus, the executive branch cannot ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌intervene.

MORE STORIES

Laura Ingraham pointed to a series of off-year election results as evidence that Democrats are gaining momentum nationwide
25 minutes ago
Zohran Mamdani pledged to make NYC a safe haven for transgender residents, promising major funding for gender-affirming care and LGBTQIA+ protections
44 minutes ago
Michelle Obama described feeling a deep sense of loss, explaining that her reaction was not personal but tied to the nation’s traditions and values
53 minutes ago
Trump maintains James Comey and Letitia James are guilty after indictments against them are voided
1 hour ago
Bruna Ferreira, mother of Karoline Leavitt’s 11-year-old nephew, is in custody at a Louisiana ICE facility and faces deportation to Brazil
2 hours ago
Donald Trump dismissed a report claiming he fired Kash Patel, instead praising the FBI Director and posing for a photo to show support
2 hours ago
Eric Swalwell says service members told him privately they could act as a 'check' on Trump by refusing illegal orders
2 hours ago
Donald Trump joked that turkeys Gobble and Waddle wouldn’t be pardoned if named Chuck or Nancy during the annual White House Thanksgiving ritual
3 hours ago
The leak triggered backlash from Republican Congressman Don Bacon, who accused Steve Witkoff of bias toward Russia and argued he should be removed
3 hours ago
A leaked transcript shows Steve Witkoff coaching Yuri Ushakov on flattering President Donald Trump during talks on Vladimir Putin’s Ukraine peace plan
4 hours ago