FBI seeks interviews with six Democrats after their video urging troops to defy ‘illegal orders’

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ FBI's demand to question six Democratic representatives has resulted in an rare bi-partisan support of protection of Congressional authority
PUBLISHED NOV 26, 2025
The Federal Bureau of Investigation aspires to seek interviews with six Democrats (Getty Images).
The Federal Bureau of Investigation aspires to seek interviews with six Democrats (Getty Images).

WASHINGTON, DC: Agents​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have sought six Democratic members of the Congress for interviews after a video in which they called US military personnel to disobey orders considered illegal.



This action escalates a political and legal standoff that has been going on due to the response of the president, Donald Trump, who said that the lawmakers’ behavior was ‘seditious’ and that it deserved a severe ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌reaction.

Who are the six Democrats being investigated?

The FBI​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ agents have asked House and Senate sergeants-at-arms to organize interviews with six members of Congress, according to a Justice Department official. This is said to be a move to figure out whether there is a legal basis for opening a probe.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and Director of the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Tim Boring host a listening session with Michigan farmers and agriculture industry leaders on tariffs, immigration, H5N1, and rural economic development on March 20, 2025 in Sparta, Michigan. The session comes two days after Michigan farmers held a
Sen Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) is the senator who posted the video on her X account and is among the six being interviewed (Chris duMond/Getty Images)

The senators are Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich) and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz), and the representatives are Jason Crow (D-Colo), Maggie Goodlander (D-NH), Chris Deluzio (D-Pa), and Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa).

As per the report, the video asked the military and the intelligence community to follow their oath to the Constitution rather than any order they might consider unlawful.

The administration's response to this message was very strong, including a public accusation of sedition by Trump and a related investigation at the Pentagon for Senator ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌Kelly.

Democrats respond with affirmation

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ four House Democrats in a joint statement called the FBI’s demand a politically motivated effort to ‘intimidate and harass Members of Congress,’ and denied such behavior. They pledged their loyalty to the constitution and promised that they would not be silenced.



Senator Slotkin also shared that view and said the FBI operation through its counterterrorism division was ‘a scare tactic’ to frighten people and prevent them from speaking their opinion and protesting.

On the other hand, Senator Kelly a former Navy officer - referred to the Pentagon's investigation alongside the FBI as "an intimidation move" and assured that he would not be ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌silenced.

What led to this?

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ situation unfolded earlier this week when the Defense Department announced that it was formally initiating a separate investigation into Senator Mark Kelly. The department stated that as a former Navy captain, the senator is still under the jurisdiction of the ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌UCMJ.

(Screengrab/CNN, Getty Images)
Mark Kelly has been under heat from the Trump led administration (Getty Images)

On​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ the other hand, Trump kept escalating the language by charging the representatives with “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” and then he was “not threatening death.”



The fight has additionally brought back questions of the constitution: experts in law have observed that apart from issues related to the First Amendment, the Speech or Debate Clause of Article I shields the members of the Congress from any legal actions for the operations of the legislative branch - a protection system, which is intended to stop the president from having too much power and to secure the separation of powers; thus, the executive branch cannot ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌intervene.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Attorney Crystal Marie Hauser urged public to give Brian Hooker the benefit of the doubt and treat him fairly
4 hours ago
Donald Trump appears in two episodes of the new Netflix docuseries, ‘Hulk Hogan: Real American’
4 hours ago
US court dismissed Loomer’s defamation case against Maher, ruling comedy segment didn’t meet legal defamation standards
4 hours ago
O’Reilly said he will attend the White House Correspondents’ Dinner and promised to directly call out any disruptive behavior inside the venue
5 hours ago
David Wilcock reportedly died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound on Monday, April 20, after experiencing a 'mental health crisis'
6 hours ago
Elon Musk and Charlie Kirk’s past criticism of the SPLC resurfaces after DOJ indicts the nonprofit on fraud charges.
7 hours ago
Phelan’s sudden exit follows reported tensions over shipbuilding delays as retired Navy Captain Hung Cao steps in amid ongoing Middle East operations
8 hours ago
Christina Snow has a bullet lodged in her face and suffers PTSD and memory loss, often believing her children are still alive
10 hours ago
Clinton joked that if his old Arkansas friend played today, he’d be the 'late' Jerry Jones
10 hours ago
Two workers died and over 30 sought medical care after a chemical release at a West Virginia facility.
11 hours ago