Federal judge blocks Trump admin's bid to obtain names of Fulton County's 2020 election workers
ATLANTA, GEORGIA: A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from obtaining the names and identifying information of election workers in Georgia's Fulton County, delivering a significant legal setback to the Justice Department's investigation tied to the 2020 election.
In a ruling issued this week, US District Judge William Ray concluded that the subpoena lacked a legitimate legal purpose and should not move forward.
The ruling also included unusually strong language criticizing the Justice Department's request, with the judge questioning whether the investigation could realistically lead to any criminal charges given the passage of time.
🚨 LEGAL FLASHPOINT: A judge has blocked the DOJ from obtaining the names and contact info of 2020 Fulton County election workers. The court sided with Georgia officials, who argued the federal grand jury subpoena would lead to harassment of staff. @aishahhasnie reports. pic.twitter.com/vXydmGUscT
— Special Report (@SpecialReport) July 7, 2026
Judge William Ray says Justice Department's subpoena lacks legitimate purpose
In his ruling, Judge William Ray acknowledged that the Justice Department argued it had a valid reason for seeking the records.
"The DOJ argues that it has a legitimate interest in investigating potential criminal actions in the years that followed the 2020 Election, including an alleged failure on the part of Fulton County to preserve its ballot images from 2020 for the time required by law," Ray wrote.
NEWS: Federal judge in Georgia blocks DOJ grand jury subpoena seeking information about election workers who volunteered or worked during the 2020 election in Fulton County. https://t.co/RME7KsKFlQ pic.twitter.com/p267zFMsyL
— Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) July 7, 2026
However, the judge rejected that argument, saying the department's request crossed legal boundaries.
Ray concluded that the Justice Department "is engaged in an 'arbitrary fishing expedition'" and ruled that the subpoena "is unreasonable and must be quashed."
The decision prevents the administration from obtaining the names and personal identifying information of election workers who participated in administering the 2020 election in Fulton County.
Judge says investigation cannot lead to viable criminal charges
Ray also questioned the legal basis for continuing an investigation related to the certification of Georgia's 2020 election.
According to the judge, even if investigators uncovered information supporting claims that the election was unfair, it would not result in prosecutable criminal charges because the relevant statutes of limitations have already expired.
"An investigation of alleged criminal conduct of anyone that may have led to the certification of the 2020 Election in Georgia would not be a legitimate use of the Grand Jury and its subpoena power, in that no valid indictment could issue from said Grand Jury due to the expiration of the applicable statutes of limitations," Ray wrote.
He further explained why he believed the subpoena served little legal purpose.
"These records, even if they lead to the DOJ finding individuals who worked for Fulton County in the 2020 Election who support the theory that the 2020 Election was not fair, would not lead to information that could be used to charge anyone with anything, at least not any viable charge," he added.
William Ray raises concerns over privacy and grand jury authority
Beyond rejecting the subpoena itself, Ray also expressed concern about how grand jury powers should be used.
He warned that the issue extended beyond politics and should matter regardless of a person's views on the 2020 election or President Donald Trump.
"Everyone, whether you support the President or you do not, or whether you believe the 2020 Election was fair or believe that it was not, should be concerned about the DOJ's ability to utilize the power of the Grand Jury to appropriate your private information without a legitimate purpose."
The judge's comments emphasized his belief that subpoena powers should not be used to obtain private information unless investigators can demonstrate a clear legal justification.
Fulton County says it will continue defending Georgia's election process
Following the ruling, Fulton County officials welcomed the decision and reiterated their defense of the county's handling of the 2020 election.
Robb Pitts, chairman of the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, said county leaders have consistently rejected allegations questioning the election's integrity.
Absolute genius. Fulton County's Robb Pitts just took on a federal subpoena targeting poll workers by using Trump’s own unhinged Truth Social posts as legal evidence against him. Read about this brilliant legal move:https://t.co/XZz8FXJc2Q pic.twitter.com/m9eXUMAv7d
— Scott Dworkin (@funder) May 17, 2026
"For months the county has challenged the baseless allegations of fraud in Georgia's handling of the 2020 election," Pitts said in a statement.
He added that county officials intend to continue defending the election process.
"Fulton County will continue to do all that is needed to assure Georgia citizens that our election process is fair and proper and to show that the attacks against it are baseless."
The ruling marks another legal hurdle for the Justice Department's effort to obtain information related to Fulton County's administration of the 2020 election.