'Shameful': Internet skeptical as George Conway believes Donald Trump will 'lose big' in presidential immunity case

Donald Trump is seeking absolute legal immunity preventing him from being prosecuted for a federal 2020 election subversion case in Georgia
UPDATED JUN 15, 2024
George Conway expressed trust and said that the Supreme Court will rule in the immunity case by June (Getty Images)
George Conway expressed trust and said that the Supreme Court will rule in the immunity case by June (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Conservative lawyer George Conway believes former President Donald Trump will 'lose big' in Supreme Court's presidential immunity case.

Trump is seeking absolute legal immunity preventing him from being prosecuted for a federal 2020 election subversion case in Georgia. 

Donald Trump's legal immunity bid could 'backfire,' says George Conway

The attorney and anti-Trump conservatives George Conway said the bid could  "backfire" as the Supreme Court will rule before the end of June.

It would potentially lead to the trial going ahead after 81 days, Conway said, according to CNN.



 

"I do trust the court on this. I think … Donald Trump is going to lose. I think he’s going to lose big," Conway said.

“I think there may be a few wrinkles in the opinion that may add a few steps to the process but at the end of the day, I don’t think his argument is going to fly," he added, The Hill reported. 

'I don’t think there is some grand conspiracy,' George Conway says

Conway added that Trump's legal bid could result in the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential candidate facing trial shortly before the November election.

"I don't think his argument is going to fly. In terms of the delay, I wish they had not taken the case... but the fact of the matter is, I don't think there is a grand conspiracy or even an effort by some of the justices to put this off to help Trump," Conway said. 

(Getty Images)
George Conway added that Donald Trump's legal bid could result in the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential candidate facing trial shortly before November's election (Getty Images)

He reasoned about the case being heard in the fall saying, "It was 81 days before trial, and the court has said it's going to keep that 81-day schedule."

"And if you add 81 days to the end of June, you basically get the middle of the fall campaign, so it could actually backfire on Trump," he added.

Internet reacts to George Conway's claim that Donald Trump will lose big in Supreme Court immunity case

"Watch for further delays, but even if not the damage is already done by this corrupt SCOTUS - they should have never taken up this nonsense about Presidential immunity," wrote one user on X.

"If they wanted it, back in December when J Smith asked them to take it up was the time," the user added.

"Whoever wins the battle —the immunity decision— the Supreme Court is ensuring Trump wins the war: no trial before the election. Shameful," wrote one more. 

"Well, if George says it. Must be true. This cheers me up!" one user wrote expressing hope. 

Well, either DT is gonna lose, or every single future president can do whatever the hell he/she wants, including breaking as many laws as they like. Because immunity for DT, means immunity for Joe! And the SC knows that," wrote one. 

"He just needs to lose big in the election in November," wrote one more. Yet one said, "I hope George is right but I’m skeptical." "I don't. Unfortunately," wrote one.



 



 



 



 



 



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Subpoena marks escalation in probe examining how top officials handled intelligence tied to 2016 election claims
8 minutes ago
Tulsi Gabbard said the objectives laid out by President Trump were different from those outlined by the Israeli government
5 hours ago
President Trump said that advance warning would have hurt strikes, claiming surprise let forces hit about 50% of targets in two days
6 hours ago
President Trump said oil prices rose and the economic slowdown was less severe than he had anticipated before authorizing military action
7 hours ago
'No, I'm not putting troops anywhere. If I were, I certainly wouldn't tell you, but I'm not putting troops', President Trump said
7 hours ago
Tulsi Gabbard told lawmakers that Israel targeted Iran's leadership, while US priorities focused on military capabilities
8 hours ago
Lawmakers emphasized the need for a detailed spending breakdown before considering approval of the large defense funding request
9 hours ago
Pete Hegseth noted that US forces have already struck more than 7,000 targets across Iran, while adding, 'It takes money to k*ll bad guys'
9 hours ago
Pete Hegseth emphasized that the ultimate decision on the endgame in the Iran war rests with President Donald Trump
11 hours ago
John Fetterman crossed party lines to back Markwayne Mullin in a key vote, citing the need for DHS leadership and drawing criticism from colleagues
11 hours ago