Internet weighs in as CNN's Jeffrey Toobin says SCOTUS is likely to overturn Donald Trump's Colorado ballot ban

CNN's Jeffery Toobin predicted that Donald Trump is likely to have a 'slam dunk' victory based on SCOTUS' oral arguments regarding the Colorado ballot ban
Jeffery Toobin provided his forecast on SCOTUS' possible ruling on Donald Trump's ballot eligibility (Jeffrey Toobin/Facebook, Getty Images)
Jeffery Toobin provided his forecast on SCOTUS' possible ruling on Donald Trump's ballot eligibility (Jeffrey Toobin/Facebook, Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: On Friday, February 9, legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin opined that the US Supreme Court would overturn former President Donald Trump's ban from the Colorado Republican primary ballot.

On 'CNN This Morning', Toobin said, "I don’t usually like to predict the outcome of Supreme Court cases based on oral argument. I’m gonna make an exception and say this was a slam dunk victory in the offing for the Trump campaign."

His comments follow the court's apparent reluctance to prohibit Trump from appearing on the ballot during the hearing of oral arguments on Thursday.

Supreme Court Justices question a state's role in disqualifying Donald Trump from the ballot

During a recent session of the highest court of the nation, certain justices expressed a measure of sympathy for Trump's contention that states lack the authority to disqualify federal candidates.

Additionally, some of them queried whether the Insurrection Clause contained within the 14th Amendment applies to the presidency, according to The Hill.

Justice Elena Kagan asked, "What’s a state doing deciding who other citizens get to vote for president?" Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized the "daunting consequence" of other states possibly getting rid of Democratic candidates from their primary ballots if the court disqualifies Trump.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Team Trump (@teamtrump)


 

Toobin remarked, "I have rarely seen a contested case where the political breakdown did not — was not reflected in the oral argument. This was close to unanimous."

On Thursday, CNN analyst Van Jones claimed that the court's reluctance to remove Trump from the ballot demonstrated a "foregone conclusion" that is undoubtedly "very frustrating for a lot of people."

He explained, "This is a Supreme Court that seems very strong when it’s time to take rights away from women, very strong when it’s time to take diversity programs away from college kids, very, very strong."

"Voting rights away from Americans, very, very strong. But now, it’s time to disenfranchise a disenfranchiser and they’re just looking for the exits," asserted Jones. 

Internet reacts to Jeffrey Toobin's prediction regarding SCOTUS' possible move on Donald Trump's ballot ban

Soon after Toobin's comments regarding SCOTUS' possible ruling over Trump's presence on the Colorado GOP primary ballot came to light, the netizens were quick to offer their thoughts regarding the case. 

One remarked, "It seems this SCOTUS is intent on undermining the Constitution?" and another noted, "That has to be the safest bet of the year."

"Sounds like the Supreme Court does not care about the rule of law or the US turning into a dictatorship," opined a person, while someone else added, "Of course they will. They only say 'it’s up to the states' when it fits their deal."

An individual expressed, "I believe Scotus will agree that it's not ok," and one more said, "That conclusion did not take a legal analyst."



 



 



 



 



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Hunter Biden urges voters to look past scandals while defending Maine Democrat
3 hours ago
Federal judge delivers major setback to Trump’s Kennedy Center rebranding push
3 hours ago
Judge Amit Mehta ruled that plaintiffs showed no direct injury from the event, leaving them unable to pursue the case in federal court
6 hours ago
Vice President JD Vance disputed the reported terms of the US-Iran agreement and criticized those who judged negotiations based on unverified reports
6 hours ago
Tulsi Gabbard accused officials of misleading Americans about taxpayer-funded biolabs and said legitimate questions were ignored for years
7 hours ago
The dispute centered on a proposed $1.776B fund that sparked controversy, with supporters saying it addressed claims of unfair government targeting
8 hours ago
Wall Street rallies, crude tumbles on optimism over potential Iran agreement
8 hours ago
Iranian state-linked outlets reported purported elements of a future agreement, sparking a dispute over the claims' accuracy and implications
9 hours ago
Donald Trump made the remark as his administration pursued a potential Iran agreement while regional tensions remained high
16 hours ago
In the Washington mayoral race, City Council member Janeese Lewis-George, a Democratic socialist, is leading former City Council Member at-Large Kenyan McDuffie (D) by double digits
16 hours ago