Internet weighs in as CNN's Jeffrey Toobin says SCOTUS is likely to overturn Donald Trump's Colorado ballot ban

CNN's Jeffery Toobin predicted that Donald Trump is likely to have a 'slam dunk' victory based on SCOTUS' oral arguments regarding the Colorado ballot ban
Jeffery Toobin provided his forecast on SCOTUS' possible ruling on Donald Trump's ballot eligibility (Jeffrey Toobin/Facebook, Getty Images)
Jeffery Toobin provided his forecast on SCOTUS' possible ruling on Donald Trump's ballot eligibility (Jeffrey Toobin/Facebook, Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: On Friday, February 9, legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin opined that the US Supreme Court would overturn former President Donald Trump's ban from the Colorado Republican primary ballot.

On 'CNN This Morning', Toobin said, "I don’t usually like to predict the outcome of Supreme Court cases based on oral argument. I’m gonna make an exception and say this was a slam dunk victory in the offing for the Trump campaign."

His comments follow the court's apparent reluctance to prohibit Trump from appearing on the ballot during the hearing of oral arguments on Thursday.

Supreme Court Justices question a state's role in disqualifying Donald Trump from the ballot

During a recent session of the highest court of the nation, certain justices expressed a measure of sympathy for Trump's contention that states lack the authority to disqualify federal candidates.

Additionally, some of them queried whether the Insurrection Clause contained within the 14th Amendment applies to the presidency, according to The Hill.

Justice Elena Kagan asked, "What’s a state doing deciding who other citizens get to vote for president?" Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized the "daunting consequence" of other states possibly getting rid of Democratic candidates from their primary ballots if the court disqualifies Trump.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Team Trump (@teamtrump)


 

Toobin remarked, "I have rarely seen a contested case where the political breakdown did not — was not reflected in the oral argument. This was close to unanimous."

On Thursday, CNN analyst Van Jones claimed that the court's reluctance to remove Trump from the ballot demonstrated a "foregone conclusion" that is undoubtedly "very frustrating for a lot of people."

He explained, "This is a Supreme Court that seems very strong when it’s time to take rights away from women, very strong when it’s time to take diversity programs away from college kids, very, very strong."

"Voting rights away from Americans, very, very strong. But now, it’s time to disenfranchise a disenfranchiser and they’re just looking for the exits," asserted Jones. 

Internet reacts to Jeffrey Toobin's prediction regarding SCOTUS' possible move on Donald Trump's ballot ban

Soon after Toobin's comments regarding SCOTUS' possible ruling over Trump's presence on the Colorado GOP primary ballot came to light, the netizens were quick to offer their thoughts regarding the case. 

One remarked, "It seems this SCOTUS is intent on undermining the Constitution?" and another noted, "That has to be the safest bet of the year."

"Sounds like the Supreme Court does not care about the rule of law or the US turning into a dictatorship," opined a person, while someone else added, "Of course they will. They only say 'it’s up to the states' when it fits their deal."

An individual expressed, "I believe Scotus will agree that it's not ok," and one more said, "That conclusion did not take a legal analyst."



 



 



 



 



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Although Trump has historically favored mail-in or Election Day voting, he is voting in person during Florida’s early voting period
2026-10-23T20:23:04.000Z
Judge Bennett disagreed with the decision, saying the appeals court should not have ruled on the case at this stage. The Trump administration wanted to withdraw its appeal and return to the lower court to discuss how the Supreme Court’s ruling would affect the case
2026-10-23T19:03:58.000Z
The lawsuit stems from the presence of a third Senate candidate, Daniel J. Sullivan, whose name closely resembles that of incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan
2026-10-23T18:08:34.000Z
The charges are part of a probe into whether FBI officials sought to minimise allegations of corruption involving the Biden family and evidence linked to Hunter Biden’s laptop
2026-10-23T17:00:17.000Z
No official truce was declared as the US maintained its naval blockade of Iran and Tehran continued restricting access through the Strait of Hormuz
2026-10-23T15:44:52.000Z
Donald Trump’s 2026 midterm election stakes rise as competitive Senate races in Kansas, Texas, Ohio, Maine and Alaska threaten GOP control
2026-10-23T08:01:20.000Z
A spokesperson said that the allegations were 'completely false' and reaffirmed that Ilhan Omar is her real name
2026-10-23T04:04:58.000Z
Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that the lower court’s order sought to address alleged misinformation about election rules rather than change the state law
2026-10-23T03:09:16.000Z
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine urged Vivek Ramaswamy to pull the Amy Acton ad, calling it 'deeply, deeply troubling' and wrong to run
2026-10-23T02:28:06.000Z
As per Pentagon officials, it gives a similar 'tingling sensation' as the blast of heat when opening an oven, resulting in a 10-15 minute itching and burning sensation
2026-10-22T20:33:58.000Z