Jake Tapper shows blacked-out Epstein files on his phone: ‘100 pages of redaction’

White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson defended the redactions in the Epstein files, saying they were done to protect the victims
PUBLISHED DEC 20, 2025
Jake Tapper raised transparency concerns over the heavy redactions in the Epstein files released on Friday, December 19 (CNN)
Jake Tapper raised transparency concerns over the heavy redactions in the Epstein files released on Friday, December 19 (CNN)


WASHINGTON, DC: The Justice Department’s release of Epstein files on Friday, December 19, quickly sparked criticism from CNN's Jake Tapper.

He questioned how much "transparency" the Donald Trump administration was actually providing under the law. The Epstein Transparency Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law, required the government to release all related files by midnight on Friday.

Jake Tapper highlights heavy redactions in Epstein files

(CNN)
Jake Tapper showed a close-up of his phone to highlight the heavy redactions in the released documents (CNN)

CNN Justice Correspondent Evan Perez said Congress will likely debate the heavy redactions.

He explained, “One of the things I think we’re going to see going forward is the question of, why can’t we see that? Why is that being redacted? Because this law is pretty clear that Congress meant for the public to see as much of this as possible.”

Tapper showed his iPhone on air.“Talk about blacking out. I don’t know if I can get a close-up of my phone."

He added, "This is one of the documents that the Justice Department released. It’s 100 pages. This is what it looks like, I don’t know if you can see. It’s all black. It’s just 100 pages of redaction. That’s the transparency we’re getting here."

Perez remarked, “We understand, obviously, that there needs to be a protection of these victims…The question is, what is behind those blacked-out pages? And is it something that DOJ is being overcautious about — to protect what, I don’t know — or is this something that Congress has to maybe go back in and tell them that they need to release?”

White House defends redactions



White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson defended the redactions in the Epstein files, writing on X, “This clearly says that it was redacted to protect victims. Ridiculous to demand the names of victims be shared publicly.” 

She added in another post, “Why do the sickos in the liberal media want a document called ‘masseuse list,’ which was clearly redacted to protect victims, to be public?”

In this handout, the mug shot of Jeffrey Epstein, 2019. (Photo by Kypros/Getty Images)
In this handout, the mug shot of Jeffrey Epstein, 2019. (Kypros/Getty Images)

Frustration is growing inside the Justice Department as lawyers rush to redact thousands of Jeffrey Epstein-related files before Friday’s deadline, multiple sources told CNN.

The files are massive, and teams must go through records from different federal law enforcement offices to decide which ones fall under the transparency law and which need redactions to protect Epstein’s victims or follow confidentiality rules.

Lawyers have received only four pages of internal guidance to help with redactions, one source said. Most of these guidelines focus on exceptions to the transparency law.

The process also faces logistical challenges. Lawyers are working through files that include duplicates, which the sources say haven’t been removed. This increases the risk of inconsistent or incorrect redactions and adds hundreds of extra pages for lawyers to review, far more than they would normally handle.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Donald Trump attacked Pope Leo XIV as 'weak on crime,' fueling a growing public feud
28 minutes ago
O’Reilly cites media clips to challenge narrative, insists both Trump and Pope roles are fundamentally different
1 hour ago
Developments follow Trump saying Hormuz is open again and the crisis has passed
11 hours ago
Omar's team blames filing errors, denies she was ever a millionaire
14 hours ago
Clash began after Kimmel on Michelle Obama podcast defended focus on politics and Trump
15 hours ago
Mark Levin’s remarks came after Donald Trump, on Friday, April 17, said that he trusts Iran to sign the peace deal soon
23 hours ago
Trace Gallagher suggested that Jimmy Kimmel became consumed by opposing Trump, with monologues focusing on legal battles and political outrage
1 day ago
Mark Levin amplifies Trump's message by reposting Hormuz reopening announcement
1 day ago
Harry Enten said that Democrats had a slight edge in senior voter preferences, but the shift was not large enough to signal a major realignment
2 days ago
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin argued that statutory requirements, including legal representation and due process, contribute heavily to overall costs
2 days ago