Thomas Massie demands full release of Epstein files as DOJ signals possible delay

Todd Blanche claimed that only partial Epstein files disclosure might be possible as the Justice Department was still reviewing materials
UPDATED DEC 19, 2025
Thomas Massie posted the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act' on social media to pressure the DOJ, highlighting the '30 days' and 'all records' part in the law (Getty Images)
Thomas Massie posted the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act' on social media to pressure the DOJ, highlighting the '30 days' and 'all records' part in the law (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Rep Thomas Massie (R-Ky) pushed back on Friday, December 19, after Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche warned that the Justice Department might not release the full set of Epstein files by the end of the day, despite a statutory deadline set by Congress.

Blanche’s remarks raised immediate concerns among lawmakers who sponsored the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act', which mandates the public release of unclassified records within a fixed timeline.



DOJ warns deadline may not be met

Speaking earlier on Friday, Blanche said that the department was still reviewing materials and suggested that it might not be able to complete the full release before the deadline expired. 

The warning came as pressure mounted on the Justice Department to comply with the law’s requirements without delay.

These comments marked the first public acknowledgment from senior DOJ leadership that the department could fall short of the deadline outlined in the bipartisan legislation.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - APRIL 19: Former U.S. President Donald Trump (R) sits with his attorney Todd Blanche (L) during his criminal trial as jury selection continues at Manhattan Criminal Court on April 19, 2024 in New York City. Trump was charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records last year, which prosecutors say was an effort to hide a potential sex scandal, both before and after the 2016 presidential election. Trump is the first former U.S. president to face trial on criminal charges. (Photo by Mark Peterson - Pool/Getty Images)
Donald Trump sits with his attorney, Todd Blanche, during his criminal trial as jury selection continues at Manhattan Criminal Court on April 19, 2024, in New York City (Mark Peterson - Pool/Getty Images)

Thomas Massie responds with the statute

Thomas Massie responded publicly by posting a copy of the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act', and highlighting two key phrases in yellow: ‘30 days’ and ‘all’ records.

The statute requires the attorney general to make all unclassified Epstein-related records publicly available within 30 days of enactment.

Rep Ro Khanna (D-Calif), a Democratic co-sponsor of the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act', also issued a warning to the Justice Department, cautioning that any “tampering” or excessive redaction of the court-ordered Epstein records could result in criminal consequences.

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 04: U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) leaves a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on June 04, 2025 in Washington, DC. The Republicans met following the passage of the budget reconciliation bill. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Thomas Massie (R-KY) leaves a House Republican caucus meeting at the US Capitol on June 04, 2025, in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

In a post on X, he said, “Let me be very clear. We need a full release. Anyone who tampers with these documents or conceals documents or engages in excessive redaction will be prosecuted because of obstruction of justice.”

“We will prosecute individuals regardless of whether they’re the attorney general or a career or political appointee,” he continued, adding that transparency was essential to restoring public trust.

Bipartisan pressure behind the release

Thomas Massie co-sponsored the legislation alongside Ro Khanna, bypassing House leadership last month to force a floor vote that ultimately led to the bill’s passage.

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 11:  Rep Ro Khanna (D-CA) speaks at a rally with MoveOn members and allies ga
Lawmakers say that Congress expects the law to be followed as written (Getty Images)

Supporters of the law argue that any failure to meet the deadline would undermine congressional authority and raise questions about executive compliance with binding statutes.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Trump lashes out at Supreme Court justices after they strike down his emergency tariffs, sparking Maher’s satirical take
3 hours ago
The Capitol Rotunda honor is reserved for presidents, top officials, and select civilians; Jackson’s family plans local memorials instead
3 hours ago
Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie said they will bring Epstein survivors, with up to 12 victims expected to attend
4 hours ago
Pritzker says Trump’s tariff policy harmed Illinois families and farms, calling for $8.6B in direct compensation after Supreme Court ruling
5 hours ago
Nancy Pelosi said the Supreme Court rightly struck down the tariffs, upholding the Constitution while 'rejecting an abuse of executive power'
5 hours ago
Justice Brett Kavanaugh argued tariffs regulate imports and said lawmakers, not courts, should settle the trade dispute
5 hours ago
Newsom accused Trump of self-dealing and cronyism, saying his tariff push reflects desperation and weak leadership
6 hours ago
At the WH, Trump said the ruling is contradictory as he can take harsh trade action against countries but cannot impose even a small tariff fee
7 hours ago
Omar argues only Congress can authorize military action, warning unilateral moves could drag the US into another conflict
8 hours ago
Vance says the 6-3 decision limits presidential trade powers and makes it harder to shield US jobs and supply chains
9 hours ago