Ro Khanna warns DOJ against tampering ahead of Epstein records release deadline

Ro Khanna highlighted to the DOJ that compliance with court mandates was mandatory, regardless of political rank or institutional hierarchy
Ro Khanna warned the DOJ against Epstein file tampering as he insisted that any concealment or excessive redaction of the records could trigger obstruction charges (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Ro Khanna warned the DOJ against Epstein file tampering as he insisted that any concealment or excessive redaction of the records could trigger obstruction charges (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)


WASHINGTON, DC: Rep Ro Khanna (D-Calif), a Democratic co-sponsor of the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act', issued a blunt warning to the Justice Department, cautioning that any “tampering” or excessive redaction of the court-ordered Epstein records could result in criminal consequences.

In a video posted on social media, Khanna said that the documents are scheduled for release by 11.59 pm on Friday, December 19, under multiple federal court orders and stressed that the disclosure must be complete.

He said that thousands of records are expected to become public following decades of litigation and sealed proceedings.

“Let me be very clear. We need a full release,” Khanna said. “Anyone who tampers with these documents or conceals documents or engages in excessive redaction will be prosecuted because of obstruction of justice.”

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 18: Subcommittee ranking member Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) arrives for a House Armed Services Subcommittee on Cyber, Information Technologies and Innovation hearing about artificial intelligence on Capitol Hill July 18, 2023 in Washington, DC. The hearing focused on barriers that prevent the Department of Defense from adopting and deploying A.I. effectively and the risks from adversarial A.I. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Subcommittee ranking member Rep Ro Khanna (D-CA) arrives for a House Armed Services Subcommittee on Cyber, Information Technologies and Innovation hearing about artificial intelligence on Capitol Hill, July 18, 2023, in Washington, DC (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Lawmaker cites court orders and warns of consequences

Khanna said that teams within the Justice Department were actively preparing the records for release and emphasized that compliance with judicial orders was mandatory, regardless of political considerations or institutional rank.

“We will prosecute individuals regardless of whether they’re the attorney general or a career or political appointee,” he said, adding that transparency was essential to restoring public trust.

Khanna said three federal judges have separately ordered the release of the materials and argued that the legislation was designed specifically to prevent discretionary delays or selective disclosures.

DOJ building (Getty Images)
The Justice Department is preparing records for release under multiple federal court orders (Getty Images)

“As I’m speaking, dozens of lawyers on the national security team at the Department of Justice are preparing the documents for release,” he said, warning that any deviation from court directives could constitute obstruction of justice.

He framed the moment as a legal obligation rather than a political event, saying Congress intended the disclosure to be comprehensive and resistant to behind-the-scenes interference.

Focus on transparency and accountability

Khanna said that the release is intended to deliver transparency for Epstein survivors and ensure accountability through lawful processes, while remaining grounded in court rulings and due process.

“Tomorrow, finally, rich and powerful men who committed crimes or covered them up will be held accountable,” he said, without naming any individuals.

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 28: The Guardian or Authority of Law, created by sculptor James Earle Fra
Three federal judges previously ordered the Epstein-related documents unsealed (Getty Images)

The congressman added that the release would serve as a test of institutional credibility, noting that the public would closely scrutinize how the Justice Department handles the process.

The Justice Department has not publicly responded to Khanna’s remarks or detailed how the records will be structured once released.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Abdul El-Sayed questioned the Fox News anchor's approach as Republican rival Mike Rogers defended his criticism of the Michigan Democrat's political beliefs
2026-10-24T03:17:11.000Z
The White House said that the changes were intended to refine earlier tariff measures and 'better serve the public interest'
2026-10-24T02:59:40.000Z
Although Trump has historically favored mail-in or Election Day voting, he is voting in person during Florida’s early voting period
2026-10-23T20:23:04.000Z
Judge Bennett disagreed with the decision, saying the appeals court should not have ruled on the case at this stage. The Trump administration wanted to withdraw its appeal and return to the lower court to discuss how the Supreme Court’s ruling would affect the case
2026-10-23T19:03:58.000Z
The lawsuit stems from the presence of a third Senate candidate, Daniel J. Sullivan, whose name closely resembles that of incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan
2026-10-23T18:08:34.000Z
The charges are part of a probe into whether FBI officials sought to minimise allegations of corruption involving the Biden family and evidence linked to Hunter Biden’s laptop
2026-10-23T17:00:17.000Z
No official truce was declared as the US maintained its naval blockade of Iran and Tehran continued restricting access through the Strait of Hormuz
2026-10-23T15:44:52.000Z
Donald Trump’s 2026 midterm election stakes rise as competitive Senate races in Kansas, Texas, Ohio, Maine and Alaska threaten GOP control
2026-10-23T08:01:20.000Z
A spokesperson said that the allegations were 'completely false' and reaffirmed that Ilhan Omar is her real name
2026-10-23T04:04:58.000Z
Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that the lower court’s order sought to address alleged misinformation about election rules rather than change the state law
2026-10-23T03:09:16.000Z