JD Vance hints at rising tension with Trump, says 'I've learned my lesson' on speaking for ex-POTUS

JD Vance skirted around a question about Donald Trump's stance on a federal abortion ban during an NBC News 'Meet the Press' interview
PUBLISHED SEP 16, 2024
JD Vance was questioned about Donald Trump's stance on a federal abortion ban on NBC News' 'Meet the Press' (Getty Images)
JD Vance was questioned about Donald Trump's stance on a federal abortion ban on NBC News' 'Meet the Press' (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: JD Vance appeared to indicate a change in his approach when it comes to speaking on behalf of former President Donald Trump, particularly concerning the contentious issue of a federal abortion ban.

During an interview with NBC News 'Meet the Press' host Kristen Welker on Sunday, September 15, the Ohio senator acknowledged, "I think that I've learned my lesson on speaking for the president before he and I have actually talked about an issue," as per Daily Mail.



 

Donald Trump's ambiguity on national abortion ban during ABC News debate

This admission marks a significant departure from JD Vance's previous stance, where he confidently asserted Donald Trump's opposition to a national abortion ban.

Last month, the GOP VP pick was clear in his belief that the former president would not support a federal ban on abortion, emphasizing that the issue was unlikely to reach the Oval Office due to the challenges it would face in Congress. 

However, during the September 10 ABC News debate, when asked about vetoing a bill that would impose such a ban, Trump's response was notably noncommittal. He simply stated, "I won't have to," implying that the situation wouldn't arise.

(Getty Images)
Donald Trump appeared to distance himself from his running mate JD Vance's remarks regarding a national abortion ban during the ABC News debate (Getty Images)

This ambiguity contrasted sharply with Vance's earlier comments, leading to a rare public moment of discord between the two.

When pressed during the debate about his running mate's remarks, Trump distanced himself, saying, "I didn’t discuss it with JD, in all fairness. And I don’t mind if he has a certain view, but I don’t think he was speaking for me."

JD Vance remains firm that a national abortion ban is 'not on the table'

JD Vance's recent comments have added fuel to the already heated discussion surrounding the Republican ticket's stance on abortion.

While he maintains that a national abortion ban is "not on the table," the discrepancy between his and Trump's messaging has provided ammunition for their political opponents.

Democratic nominee Kamala Harris' campaign quickly seized upon the confusion. Sarafina Chitik, a spokesperson for the Harris campaign, labeled Trump and Vance's ticket as "the most extreme, anti-choice ticket in history."

She went further to say, "Today's admission from Vance is the latest proof of what voters already know: Trump and Vance will implement their Project 2025 playbook to ban abortion nationwide the minute they get the chance."

DELAWARE, OH - APRIL 23: J.D. Vance, a Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Ohio, arrives onstage
JD Vance insists that the GOP 2024 ticket isn't in favor of a national abortion ban (Getty Images)

These developments have put Vance in a position where he has had to clarify his statements while maintaining party unity. He insists that Trump has been "incredibly clear" in his belief that abortion policy should be determined by individual states rather than at the national level.

During Sunday's interview, the Ohio senator elaborated, "He wants abortion policy to be made by the states. Because he thinks, look, Alabama is going to make a different decision from California and that's OK. We're a big country, we can disagree."

However, during an August interview with Welker, Vance had been more assertive in suggesting that Trump would veto any national abortion regulation, saying, "I think he's been clear, he wouldn't support it. I mean he said that explicitly."

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Tulsi Gabbard said the objectives laid out by President Trump were different from those outlined by the Israeli government
3 hours ago
President Trump said that advance warning would have hurt strikes, claiming surprise let forces hit about 50% of targets in two days
4 hours ago
President Trump said oil prices rose and the economic slowdown was less severe than he had anticipated before authorizing military action
5 hours ago
'No, I'm not putting troops anywhere. If I were, I certainly wouldn't tell you, but I'm not putting troops', President Trump said
6 hours ago
Tulsi Gabbard told lawmakers that Israel targeted Iran's leadership, while US priorities focused on military capabilities
6 hours ago
Lawmakers emphasized the need for a detailed spending breakdown before considering approval of the large defense funding request
7 hours ago
Pete Hegseth noted that US forces have already struck more than 7,000 targets across Iran, while adding, 'It takes money to k*ll bad guys'
7 hours ago
Pete Hegseth emphasized that the ultimate decision on the endgame in the Iran war rests with President Donald Trump
9 hours ago
John Fetterman crossed party lines to back Markwayne Mullin in a key vote, citing the need for DHS leadership and drawing criticism from colleagues
9 hours ago
Elizabeth Warren had consistently connected the Iran conflict to rising financial pressure on American households
15 hours ago