‘She’s a lying sac’: Jen Psaki trolled after agreeing to testify before House panel over Afghanistan withdrawal

The House Foreign Affairs Committee is investigating President Biden’s controversial withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan in 2021
PUBLISHED JUN 18, 2024
Jen Psaki, former White House press secretary and current MSNBC host, agreed to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee (Getty Images)
Jen Psaki, former White House press secretary and current MSNBC host, agreed to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Jen Psaki, the former White House press secretary and current MSNBC host, has agreed to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

The announcement was made by Committee Chair Michael McCaul (R-Texas) earlier this week, signaling a notable step in the committee's ongoing investigation into President Biden’s controversial withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan in 2021.

Jen Psaki's commitment to testify before committee

Psaki has agreed to a transcribed interview scheduled for July 26, following months of the committee seeking her testimony. This agreement was detailed in a letter from McCaul to Psaki, dated Monday, June 17. McCaul emphasized the importance of her appearance, though he noted a condition attached to Psaki’s agreement.

“However, I understand you have conditioned your appearance on approval by the White House,” McCaul wrote. “As my staff informed your counsel, it is incumbent on a witness appearing before the Committee to make any third-party arrangements.”

McCaul expects Psaki to resolve this condition by June 26, 2024. “If not, I must treat your June 12 response as a refusal to appear and you will be compelled to sit for a deposition on July 26, 2024,” he stated.

In a letter dated June 12, Psaki’s attorney highlighted the need for deference to the White House Counsel’s Office, citing constitutional accommodations.

The attorney stated that the committee “must defer to the White House Counsel’s Office and allow them to engage in the constitutionally mandated accommodations process,” because “the Committee [is] seeking information about Ms Psaki’s service as White House Press Secretary and Assistant to the President.” 

Psaki is “a private citizen who has no authority to make decisions on behalf of the Executive Branch or to weigh the confidentiality interests at issue,” her attorney wrote in the letter obtained by The Hill on Monday.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 27: White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki calls on reporters during the dai
Former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki agreed to appear before the the House Foreign Affairs Committee (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) 

McCaul had previously threatened to issue a subpoena if Psaki did not voluntarily agree to testify. In his letter, McCaul referenced Psaki’s recent book 'Say More' which discusses her tenure under Biden, to underscore her obligation to appear before Congress.

“Ms Psaki is a private citizen, who has published her insight into the US withdrawal from Afghanistan for public consumption and personal profit,” McCaul wrote. “Ms Psaki’s duty to appear before Congress is manifest, and her former employer’s desire to avoid congressional oversight is not relevant,” he asserted.

Psaki’s attorney, Emily Loeb, affirmed Psaki’s respect for the committee’s oversight role and willingness to assist.

“We have communicated to the Committee on several occasions that Ms Psaki respects the important oversight function of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and wishes to be as helpful as possible in responding to the Committee’s legitimate oversight requests,” Loeb stated.

“In good faith, over a week ago, we asked for clarification on the scope of information the Committee is seeking from Ms Psaki about the US withdrawal from Afghanistan,” Loeb said. “We have not heard back on those questions.  We will again respond by the deadline in the Chairman’s most recent letter.”

In response, a representative for McCaul expressed frustration with the delay, stating, “Ms Psaki has been dragging this out for almost nine months, and we have given her multiple opportunities to confirm dates.”

The spokesperson reiterated at the time the ultimatum that Psaki must schedule her testimony by June 12 at 5 pm or face a subpoena

Jen Psaki sparks backlash on social media

Social media was inundated with reactions after it emerged that she had finally agreed to be interviewed by the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

"What a waste of time. She's a lying sac," one posted on X.

"She will just lie more about it," another wrote.

"She works for liberal media now, she will just lie lol," someone else added.

"Q: blah, blah, blah A: 5th Q: blah, blah, blah A: 5th Q: blah, blah, blah A: 5th Q: blah, blah, blah A: 5th Q: blah, blah, blah A: 5th," another chimed in.



 



 



 



 

Psaki, who previously served as the chief spokesperson for Biden’s administration and was a Democratic political operative, left her White House role in 2022. Shortly after, she joined MSNBC as a host, becoming a key figure in the network’s political news and analysis programming.

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online. 

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

'We made a lot more money than anybody thought because of tariffs, and the bill helped us along,' Trump said, pointing to the Republican tax cuts
1 hour ago
The legislation will have a tough path in the Senate, largely needing Democratic support to get over procedural hurdles
2 hours ago
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers his investigation uncovered evidence of Donald Trump obstructing justice and retaining classified documents
4 hours ago
The poll shows her leading Vance 51% to 49% in a hypothetical 2028 presidential match.
4 hours ago
Cruz advanced the 'ROTOR Act' amid NDAA dispute, negotiating to separate safety provisions from defense legislation over weakened standards concerns
7 hours ago
Brendan Carr agreed on First Amendment protections but also cited Democrats’ efforts to allegedly pressure cable firms to drop conservative networks
8 hours ago
Dan Newhouse’s departure underscored the political fallout faced by Republicans who opposed Donald Trump in 2021
11 hours ago
Jim Jordan’s subpoena compelled Jack Smith to testify after months of resistance, as Republicans argued the closed format allowed deeper questioning
11 hours ago
In a blow to Speaker Mike Johnson, four GOP lawmakers backed a Democratic push to extend ACA subsidies, giving Democrats 218 signatures
13 hours ago
At the White House Hanukkah reception, Miriam Adelson standing next to Trump asked him to run with the crowd chanting, ‘four more years’
22 hours ago