‘She’s a lying sac’: Jen Psaki trolled after agreeing to testify before House panel over Afghanistan withdrawal

The House Foreign Affairs Committee is investigating President Biden’s controversial withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan in 2021
Jen Psaki, former White House press secretary and current MSNBC host, agreed to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee (Getty Images)
Jen Psaki, former White House press secretary and current MSNBC host, agreed to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Jen Psaki, the former White House press secretary and current MSNBC host, has agreed to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

The announcement was made by Committee Chair Michael McCaul (R-Texas) earlier this week, signaling a notable step in the committee's ongoing investigation into President Biden’s controversial withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan in 2021.

Jen Psaki's commitment to testify before committee

Psaki has agreed to a transcribed interview scheduled for July 26, following months of the committee seeking her testimony. This agreement was detailed in a letter from McCaul to Psaki, dated Monday, June 17. McCaul emphasized the importance of her appearance, though he noted a condition attached to Psaki’s agreement.

“However, I understand you have conditioned your appearance on approval by the White House,” McCaul wrote. “As my staff informed your counsel, it is incumbent on a witness appearing before the Committee to make any third-party arrangements.”

McCaul expects Psaki to resolve this condition by June 26, 2024. “If not, I must treat your June 12 response as a refusal to appear and you will be compelled to sit for a deposition on July 26, 2024,” he stated.

In a letter dated June 12, Psaki’s attorney highlighted the need for deference to the White House Counsel’s Office, citing constitutional accommodations.

The attorney stated that the committee “must defer to the White House Counsel’s Office and allow them to engage in the constitutionally mandated accommodations process,” because “the Committee [is] seeking information about Ms Psaki’s service as White House Press Secretary and Assistant to the President.” 

Psaki is “a private citizen who has no authority to make decisions on behalf of the Executive Branch or to weigh the confidentiality interests at issue,” her attorney wrote in the letter obtained by The Hill on Monday.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 27: White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki calls on reporters during the dai
Former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki agreed to appear before the the House Foreign Affairs Committee (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) 

McCaul had previously threatened to issue a subpoena if Psaki did not voluntarily agree to testify. In his letter, McCaul referenced Psaki’s recent book 'Say More' which discusses her tenure under Biden, to underscore her obligation to appear before Congress.

“Ms Psaki is a private citizen, who has published her insight into the US withdrawal from Afghanistan for public consumption and personal profit,” McCaul wrote. “Ms Psaki’s duty to appear before Congress is manifest, and her former employer’s desire to avoid congressional oversight is not relevant,” he asserted.

Psaki’s attorney, Emily Loeb, affirmed Psaki’s respect for the committee’s oversight role and willingness to assist.

“We have communicated to the Committee on several occasions that Ms Psaki respects the important oversight function of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and wishes to be as helpful as possible in responding to the Committee’s legitimate oversight requests,” Loeb stated.

“In good faith, over a week ago, we asked for clarification on the scope of information the Committee is seeking from Ms Psaki about the US withdrawal from Afghanistan,” Loeb said. “We have not heard back on those questions.  We will again respond by the deadline in the Chairman’s most recent letter.”

In response, a representative for McCaul expressed frustration with the delay, stating, “Ms Psaki has been dragging this out for almost nine months, and we have given her multiple opportunities to confirm dates.”

The spokesperson reiterated at the time the ultimatum that Psaki must schedule her testimony by June 12 at 5 pm or face a subpoena. 

Jen Psaki sparks backlash on social media

Social media was inundated with reactions after it emerged that she had finally agreed to be interviewed by the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

"What a waste of time. She's a lying sac," one posted on X.

"She will just lie more about it," another wrote.

"She works for liberal media now, she will just lie lol," someone else added.

"Q: blah, blah, blah A: 5th Q: blah, blah, blah A: 5th Q: blah, blah, blah A: 5th Q: blah, blah, blah A: 5th Q: blah, blah, blah A: 5th," another chimed in.



 



 



 



 

Psaki, who previously served as the chief spokesperson for Biden’s administration and was a Democratic political operative, left her White House role in 2022. Shortly after, she joined MSNBC as a host, becoming a key figure in the network’s political news and analysis programming.

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online. 

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Democrats plan to investigate Donald Trump's use of presidential powers on immigration and the Iran war, citing executive overreach
2026-11-12T02:32:30.000Z
Joe Biden reflected on the pressure that forced him out of the 2024 presidential race and explained how his cancer diagnosis could have changed his re-election decision
2026-11-12T01:51:53.000Z
Ron Johnson and six other Republicans urged a delay, demanding a review of election losses and changes in party leadership
2026-11-11T05:21:52.000Z
Trump accused the BBC of deliberately editing his speech to make it appear he had directly encouraged violent action
2026-11-11T04:47:49.000Z
In his memoir, Joe Biden described the apparent contradiction as 'as if there were two Donald Trumps'
2026-11-11T03:52:24.000Z
Nine Kennedy family members opposed Donald Trump's arch, arguing it would obstruct views of President John F Kennedy’s grave and Eternal Flame
2026-11-11T03:40:32.000Z
US officials have reportedly assessed that Iran's ability to launch attacks within the country and other overseas territories remains limited
2026-11-11T03:18:55.000Z
Mike Johnson called Democrats taking control of the House a 'great tragedy,' saying Republicans could have continued delivering on their agenda
2026-11-11T02:12:06.000Z
Members of both parties in the House, including returning and newly elected lawmakers, meet privately to choose their leaders through secret ballot voting
2026-11-10T20:48:49.000Z
A three-judge panel of a federal appeals court ruled against the Trump administration’s plan to investigate the government’s confidential data leak cases, suggesting access to journalists’ LinkedIn records could impart a 'damaging blow' to First Amendment rights
2026-11-10T20:03:35.000Z