Kamala Harris sparks backlash after floating Supreme Court expansion: ‘Fight fire with fire’

Harris argued that conversations about institutional reforms should not automatically be dismissed
Kamala Harris did not formally endorse a specific proposal during the conversation but indicated Democrats should remain willing to discuss sweeping reforms (Getty Images)
Kamala Harris did not formally endorse a specific proposal during the conversation but indicated Democrats should remain willing to discuss sweeping reforms (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Former Vice President Kamala Harris has sparked a new political firestorm after comments about expanding the Supreme Court and reworking the Electoral College quickly went viral online, drawing sharp rebuke from conservatives and reigniting debate over significant changes to America’s political system.

In a discussion about institutional reform and the future of American democracy, Harris said Democrats should be open to structural changes to federal power, including the Supreme Court and the Electoral College.

Harris says Democrats should discuss ‘structural reforms’

During the discussion, Harris argued that conversations about institutional reforms should not automatically be dismissed, especially after years of political polarization and legal battles over federal authority.



Harris went viral this week with her comments during a webinar for the progressive nonprofit Emerge America.

“Look, this is a moment where there are no bad ideas, a ‘no bad idea’ brainstorm is what I’d like to call it. And in that no-bad-ideas brainstorm, we talk about what we need to do and think about doing around the Electoral College.”

“We talk about the idea of Supreme Court reform, which includes expanding the Supreme Court,” Harris said on Wednesday, adding, “We invite a conversation about multi-member districts.”

Among the ideas raised were expanding the number of justices on the Supreme Court, often referred to by critics as court packing, and revisiting the Electoral College system that determines presidential elections.

Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021. Seated from left: Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Standing from left: Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. (Photo by Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images)
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021 (Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images)

“We talk about, look, if we win the Senate, which we should and we will, then the Senate Judiciary Committee should have rules that they put in place so when these people come before as nominees to the Supreme Court and lie, that they are held to account and consequence.”

“We agree that it is right to have ethics rules for Supreme Court justices, and let’s put those in place.”

The remarks quickly exploded across social media, with conservative commentators warning that such proposals could dramatically alter the balance of power in Washington.

“Let’s talk about statehood for Puerto Rico and DC. These are the things I think that we’ve got to do.”

Former Vice President Kamala Harris speaks at the Wiltern Theatre on September 29, 2025, in Los Angeles, California. Harris is in the midst of a 15-city book tour following the release of her new book, '107 Days', recounting her presidential campaign against President Donald Trump (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Former Vice President Kamala Harris speaks at the Wiltern Theatre in Los Angeles, California (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

“We’ve got to neutralize these red states from cheating, including blue states expanding their maps. And all of this, I think, is—look, we gotta fight fire with fire. These folks are playing to win. We gotta play to win too.”

Conservatives seize on comments as 2026 political battles intensify

Republicans have long argued that expanding the Supreme Court would undermine judicial independence and create a dangerous political precedent.

The clip went viral with both supporters and critics sharing her take as pundits from both sides suggested Harris was reading the Democratic Party base correctly by floating a laundry list of their long-held wants.

Rich Lowry, an editor at the conservative National Review, shared the clip and added, “Maybe Harris misunderstands the political moment the way she did when she adopted the Bernie Sanders agenda during her failed 2020 presidential campaign.”



Trump allies and conservative media figures rapidly amplified Harris’ remarks, portraying them as proof that Democrats remain committed to changing political rules to benefit their party.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Senator Thom Tillis made it clear that any nominee who appeared to excuse violence against law enforcement would struggle to earn his support
2 hours ago
The deal would allow the US to share civilian nuclear technology with Saudi Arabia as it advances its nuclear energy program
3 hours ago
The administration prepared a major intelligence overhaul as President Trump argued that years of bureaucratic growth had left the system oversized
4 hours ago
Judge John McConnell finds all challenged Trump immigration actions unlawful
5 hours ago
This marks Harris' first major electoral intervention since Louisiana v Callais, a ruling she condemned as 'backdooring racism through politics'
5 hours ago
Omar opposes Ukraine package, says sanctions would hurt civilians more than governments
5 hours ago
The federal investigations came after President Donald Trump accused Democrats of benefiting from delays in California vote counting
6 hours ago
Van Jones says concerns extend beyond allegations to the credibility of Platner’s explanations
7 hours ago
Hunter Biden wins unexpected conservative praise for discussing addiction and recovery
7 hours ago
Mojtaba Khamenei, reportedly badly injured in the February 28 US-Israeli attack, has become increasingly involved in peace talks
8 hours ago