Kamala Harris sparks backlash after floating Supreme Court expansion: ‘Fight fire with fire’
WASHINGTON, DC: Former Vice President Kamala Harris has sparked a new political firestorm after comments about expanding the Supreme Court and reworking the Electoral College quickly went viral online, drawing sharp rebuke from conservatives and reigniting debate over significant changes to America’s political system.
In a discussion about institutional reform and the future of American democracy, Harris said Democrats should be open to structural changes to federal power, including the Supreme Court and the Electoral College.
Harris says Democrats should discuss ‘structural reforms’
During the discussion, Harris argued that conversations about institutional reforms should not automatically be dismissed, especially after years of political polarization and legal battles over federal authority.
Kamala Harris is now calling for Democrats to hold a “No Bad Idea Brainstorm” where they discuss:
— Pat Adams (@PatAdams96) May 14, 2026
- Abolishing the Electoral College
- Packing the Supreme Court
- Making Puerto Rico and D.C. states
“We’ve got to neutralize these red states from cheating!” pic.twitter.com/23MPJxn7fN
Harris went viral this week with her comments during a webinar for the progressive nonprofit Emerge America.
“Look, this is a moment where there are no bad ideas, a ‘no bad idea’ brainstorm is what I’d like to call it. And in that no-bad-ideas brainstorm, we talk about what we need to do and think about doing around the Electoral College.”
“We talk about the idea of Supreme Court reform, which includes expanding the Supreme Court,” Harris said on Wednesday, adding, “We invite a conversation about multi-member districts.”
Among the ideas raised were expanding the number of justices on the Supreme Court, often referred to by critics as court packing, and revisiting the Electoral College system that determines presidential elections.
“We talk about, look, if we win the Senate, which we should and we will, then the Senate Judiciary Committee should have rules that they put in place so when these people come before as nominees to the Supreme Court and lie, that they are held to account and consequence.”
“We agree that it is right to have ethics rules for Supreme Court justices, and let’s put those in place.”
The remarks quickly exploded across social media, with conservative commentators warning that such proposals could dramatically alter the balance of power in Washington.
“Let’s talk about statehood for Puerto Rico and DC. These are the things I think that we’ve got to do.”
“We’ve got to neutralize these red states from cheating, including blue states expanding their maps. And all of this, I think, is—look, we gotta fight fire with fire. These folks are playing to win. We gotta play to win too.”
Conservatives seize on comments as 2026 political battles intensify
Republicans have long argued that expanding the Supreme Court would undermine judicial independence and create a dangerous political precedent.
The clip went viral with both supporters and critics sharing her take as pundits from both sides suggested Harris was reading the Democratic Party base correctly by floating a laundry list of their long-held wants.
Rich Lowry, an editor at the conservative National Review, shared the clip and added, “Maybe Harris misunderstands the political moment the way she did when she adopted the Bernie Sanders agenda during her failed 2020 presidential campaign.”
Maybe Harris misunderstands the political moment the way she did when she adopted the Bernie Sanders agenda during her failed 2020 presidential campaign, but she’s probably reading the Democratic room correctly and the mainstream Democratic position in 2028 will be that the… https://t.co/oU4A7WewuO
— Rich Lowry (@RichLowry) May 14, 2026
Trump allies and conservative media figures rapidly amplified Harris’ remarks, portraying them as proof that Democrats remain committed to changing political rules to benefit their party.