Kamala Harris sparks backlash after floating Supreme Court expansion: ‘Fight fire with fire’

Harris argued that conversations about institutional reforms should not automatically be dismissed
Kamala Harris did not formally endorse a specific proposal during the conversation but indicated Democrats should remain willing to discuss sweeping reforms (Getty Images)
Kamala Harris did not formally endorse a specific proposal during the conversation but indicated Democrats should remain willing to discuss sweeping reforms (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Former Vice President Kamala Harris has sparked a new political firestorm after comments about expanding the Supreme Court and reworking the Electoral College quickly went viral online, drawing sharp rebuke from conservatives and reigniting debate over significant changes to America’s political system.

In a discussion about institutional reform and the future of American democracy, Harris said Democrats should be open to structural changes to federal power, including the Supreme Court and the Electoral College.

Harris says Democrats should discuss ‘structural reforms’

During the discussion, Harris argued that conversations about institutional reforms should not automatically be dismissed, especially after years of political polarization and legal battles over federal authority.



Harris went viral this week with her comments during a webinar for the progressive nonprofit Emerge America.

“Look, this is a moment where there are no bad ideas, a ‘no bad idea’ brainstorm is what I’d like to call it. And in that no-bad-ideas brainstorm, we talk about what we need to do and think about doing around the Electoral College.”

“We talk about the idea of Supreme Court reform, which includes expanding the Supreme Court,” Harris said on Wednesday, adding, “We invite a conversation about multi-member districts.”

Among the ideas raised were expanding the number of justices on the Supreme Court, often referred to by critics as court packing, and revisiting the Electoral College system that determines presidential elections.

Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021. Seated from left: Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Standing from left: Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. (Photo by Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images)
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021 (Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images)

“We talk about, look, if we win the Senate, which we should and we will, then the Senate Judiciary Committee should have rules that they put in place so when these people come before as nominees to the Supreme Court and lie, that they are held to account and consequence.”

“We agree that it is right to have ethics rules for Supreme Court justices, and let’s put those in place.”

The remarks quickly exploded across social media, with conservative commentators warning that such proposals could dramatically alter the balance of power in Washington.

“Let’s talk about statehood for Puerto Rico and DC. These are the things I think that we’ve got to do.”

Former Vice President Kamala Harris speaks at the Wiltern Theatre on September 29, 2025, in Los Angeles, California. Harris is in the midst of a 15-city book tour following the release of her new book, '107 Days', recounting her presidential campaign against President Donald Trump (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Former Vice President Kamala Harris speaks at the Wiltern Theatre in Los Angeles, California (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

“We’ve got to neutralize these red states from cheating, including blue states expanding their maps. And all of this, I think, is—look, we gotta fight fire with fire. These folks are playing to win. We gotta play to win too.”

Conservatives seize on comments as 2026 political battles intensify

Republicans have long argued that expanding the Supreme Court would undermine judicial independence and create a dangerous political precedent.

The clip went viral with both supporters and critics sharing her take as pundits from both sides suggested Harris was reading the Democratic Party base correctly by floating a laundry list of their long-held wants.

Rich Lowry, an editor at the conservative National Review, shared the clip and added, “Maybe Harris misunderstands the political moment the way she did when she adopted the Bernie Sanders agenda during her failed 2020 presidential campaign.”



Trump allies and conservative media figures rapidly amplified Harris’ remarks, portraying them as proof that Democrats remain committed to changing political rules to benefit their party.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

The court backed four Democrats challenging FCC rules that let parties access candidates’ discounted 'lowest unit charge' TV ad rates
5 hours ago
The watchdog said the incident undermined public trust in FEMA’s ability to provide impartial disaster assistance
6 hours ago
The watchdog cited Zohran Mamdani’s endorsement of Lindsey Boylan, whom he praised for her 'bravery' in speaking out against Andrew Cuomo
7 hours ago
Ralph Alvarado’s campaign manager Andy Westberry downplayed the website changes, saying it still highlights Donald Trump’s endorsement and photo
8 hours ago
The Kennedy Center cut costs by one-third, but its deficit remained $23 million as ticket sales plunged after Donald Trump’s name was added
8 hours ago
Sources described the damage as greater than any previously suffered by US intelligence agencies
8 hours ago
Donald Trump’s renaming threat came after trade talks collapsed and the US imposed 50% tariffs on $20 billion in Canadian goods
9 hours ago
Sen Joni Ernst said Pete Hegseth had assured her Randy George would finish his term before Trump addressed the controversial removal
9 hours ago
Despite entering the race as a political newcomer, Graham benefited from the campaign of her late brother
9 hours ago
House Democrats are demanding details on the Board of Peace’s funding and oversight, with a possible investigation looming after the midterms
10 hours ago